Jump to content

$2 BILLION just doesn't go as far as it used to!


Tigermike

Recommended Posts

Is the $2 billion renovation of the United Nations building worthwhile?

Without first overhauling its membership, its leadership, its bureaucracies, and most of all the HRC? Why is it easier for everyone to want to renovate the building without considering the cancers within it?

It is an old building and after decades, I am sure it does require some type of refurbishing and modernization. But $2 billion seems like an expensive project even for the United Nations.

On the bright side, we should be happy that only 22% of the $2 billion will be funded by the US.

United Nations Renovation

http://www.plannyc.org/project-44-United-Nations-Renovation

Green Light for Renovations Is Start of U.N. Fiscal War

By BENNY AVNI <http://www2.nysun.com/authors/Benny+Avni>

Staff Reporter of the Sun

December 12, 2007

After 10 Years and 3 Plans, U.N. Renovation Is in Sight

NY Times

For $2 BILLION why don't they get all the people out and blow it up and start over? Could or would a new project cost $2 BILLION?

http://www2.nysun.com/article/67949

Link to comment
Share on other sites





It would only take about $10,000 dollars worth of material initially. The cleanup AFTER the demolition would take a little more.

Hell, we could pay for the dynamite by collecting on unpaid parking tickets from the immune delegates.

It's time the UN moved to another country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's time the UN moved to another country.

Exactly.

Further, I've been wanting the US to get out of the UN for years. It's useless IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...