TexasTiger 12,852 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, NolaAuTiger said: That's the issue. Such bias, or rather "acknowledging the obvious" (as you would have it), violates the legal ethics of one in such a position..... An FBI investigation of this sort is SUPPOSE to lack said bias and perform duties with a detached eye... Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said: Hang around. We could use a little more sanity on this corner of the forum. Hah, clearly. If only it rubbed off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Proud Tiger 4,261 Posted December 6, 2017 Author Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, McLoofus said: Inference seems to be a word of convenience for you. You used that word in a post directed at me earlier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said: You used that word in a post directed at me earlier. Sure did! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,795 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 26 minutes ago, McLoofus said: What's truly comedic is for someone to think that an agent acknowledging the obvious means that Trump isn't in bed with Putin. Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,147 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, SaltyTiger said: Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof You know, I think we need someone to define the word inference for others' benefit here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 23 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best. The presence of such bias isn't alarming? Not to mention all of the other matters the guy has been invested in??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,795 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said: You know, I think we need someone to define the word inference for others' benefit here. Inference was discussed after the post BB. I asked a question. No need for definitions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 6 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof Of course he does. To hell with Due Process though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, SaltyTiger said: Do you really think that President Trump is perhaps in bed with Vlad? your words Loof Wait... What was that "your words" thing all about? Clearly there are many, many people- in fact, all but the most ardent Trump supporters- who think that Trump is figuratively in bed with Putin. Maybe the word "collusion" has been uttered a time or two... But are you asking me if I think that Trump is literally in bed with Putin? Help me understand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 26 minutes ago, McLoofus said: Inference seems to be a word of convenience for you. Words allow for inference, sooooo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, NolaAuTiger said: Of course he does. To hell with Due Process though I see that opinions get a mixed review in here, too. Y'all crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,795 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 Just now, McLoofus said: Wait... What was that "your words" thing all about? Clearly there are many, many people- in fact, all but the most ardent Trump supporters- who think that Trump is figuratively in bed with Putin. Maybe the word "collusion" has been uttered a time or two... But are you asking me if I think that Trump is literally in bed with Putin? Help me understand. I asked you a simple question. bed with Putin....you brought it up Loof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,147 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: Inference was discussed after the post BB. I asked a question. No need for definitions And your question was premised on your faulty inference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,795 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 minute ago, Bigbens42 said: And your question was premised on your faulty inference. Well excuse me BB. I did ask a question. Why are you running interference for Loof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 5 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: I asked you a simple question. bed with Putin....you brought it up Loof And I answered the only non-batsh** crazy interpretation of your simple question. Hopefully that was the right one. By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said: And your question was premised on your faulty inference. Loof would hold Trump is in bed with Putin... I want to know what he means too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaltyTiger 7,795 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, McLoofus said: And I answered the only non-batsh** interpretation of your simple question. Hopefully that was the right one. By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed. A very simple non-batsh** yes or no would suffice Loof Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NolaAuTiger 3,295 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 2 minutes ago, McLoofus said: By the way, I think I'm posting in a thread about a special investigator who is trying to find out if Trump colluded with Russia. If I'm wrong about that, then I'm super embarrassed. Well, specifically it refers to the underscoring of a witch hunt against Trump, i.e., former/possibly present individuals conducting FBI investigation are biased. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,894 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 1 hour ago, TexasTiger said: And Mueller fired him. You're whining over nothing. Your scared for your Jim Jones. Jim Jones? Wow! That is quite the stretch there Tex. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 11,147 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 9 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said: Well excuse me BB. I did ask a question. Why are you running interference for Loof I like loof and enjoy watching you spin your wheels. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,894 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 44 minutes ago, TexasTiger said: Thus, the firing . Keep whining though, it's what you do best. In the famous words of homey, irony. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McLoofus 35,182 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 19 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said: Jim Jones? Wow! That is quite the stretch there Tex. Not really. Sure, there is a difference in the level to which each man got people to act against their own best interests, but there's an equally significant difference in the number of people each one convinced to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUFAN78 3,894 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 3 minutes ago, McLoofus said: Not really. Sure, there is a difference in the level to which each man got people to act against their own best interests, but there's an equally significant difference in the number of people each one convinced to do so. Wow! Okay to me that is crazy talk, but welcome to the forum. Hang around. It can be entertaining. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,371 Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 11 hours ago, NolaAuTiger said: The presence of such bias isn't alarming? Not to mention all of the other matters the guy has been invested in??? The guy was an educated professional. I'd be willing to bet most of the professionals in Washington - hell, in the whole country - have a low opinion of Trump. Way more than the 60% of the general population that have a low opinion of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.