Jump to content

2013 4* OG Ira Denson


ellitor

Recommended Posts

Denson taking a visit this weekend. Interest rising?

Based on his comments no. Says he is 100% FSU but just making the rounds. With that said don't put anything past our coaches.
Link to comment
Share on other sites





Denson plays guard so unless we have some plans with our current tackles I don't see why GOlson and Denson would conflict in recruitment. Also, I don't see why we would be so cool on his trail if we aren't going to fill this class. Numbers wise I don't see us going above 22 without signing a lot of backups and Denson would be a quality one if we could snag him

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denson plays guard so unless we have some plans with our current tackles I don't see why GOlson and Denson would conflict in recruitment. Also, I don't see why we would be so cool on his trail if we aren't going to fill this class. Numbers wise I don't see us going above 22 without signing a lot of backups and Denson would be a quality one if we could snag him

As I posted in TD the coaches want to add the best players they can at these positions to what is committed: 1 RB (2 if JW flips), 1 H Back, 1 OL, 2 WR, 1 DT, 2 LBs, 1 to 2 CBs, and 2 Safeties. With the 15 committed now the coaches are looking at signing 25 to 27 and they will push to sign a full class, which is 28. We have 64 on scholly now with the 3 EEs so including them we can sign 24 right now. Having 4 more picees of attrition to allow for a full 28 is very likely.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denson plays guard so unless we have some plans with our current tackles I don't see why GOlson and Denson would conflict in recruitment. Also, I don't see why we would be so cool on his trail if we aren't going to fill this class. Numbers wise I don't see us going above 22 without signing a lot of backups and Denson would be a quality one if we could snag him

Just scuttlebut, but I have heard Robinson to move inside from left tackle to guard. Just talk and no links.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Denson plays guard so unless we have some plans with our current tackles I don't see why GOlson and Denson would conflict in recruitment. Also, I don't see why we would be so cool on his trail if we aren't going to fill this class. Numbers wise I don't see us going above 22 without signing a lot of backups and Denson would be a quality one if we could snag him

Just scuttlebut, but I have heard Robinson to move inside from left tackle to guard. Just talk and no links.

Yes I heard this too, posted it in the 2013 starting lineup thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about Malzahn's blocking scheme but is Robinson cut out to be a pulling guard? (Gus pulls a lot of guards if I remember correctly)

As I posted in TD the coaches want to add the best players they can at these positions to what is committed: 1 RB (2 if JW flips), 1 H Back, 1 OL, 2 WR, 1 DT, 2 LBs, 1 to 2 CBs, and 2 Safeties. With the 15 committed now the coaches are looking at signing 25 to 27 and they will push to sign a full class, which is 28. We have 64 on scholly now with the 3 EEs so including them we can sign 24 right now. Having 4 more picees of attrition to allow for a full 28 is very likely.

I missed that post I think (or forgot) my bad. I am just looking at the depth chart and noticing that we are lacking at OG and Danzey is a 2 year solution. I don't see why we would take potentially 3 CBs and 3 WRs in this class.

Also we can't sign 28 because we only ahve 2 EE I thought.... am I missing something?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about Malzahn's blocking scheme but is Robinson cut out to be a pulling guard? (Gus pulls a lot of guards if I remember correctly)

As I posted in TD the coaches want to add the best players they can at these positions to what is committed: 1 RB (2 if JW flips), 1 H Back, 1 OL, 2 WR, 1 DT, 2 LBs, 1 to 2 CBs, and 2 Safeties. With the 15 committed now the coaches are looking at signing 25 to 27 and they will push to sign a full class, which is 28. We have 64 on scholly now with the 3 EEs so including them we can sign 24 right now. Having 4 more picees of attrition to allow for a full 28 is very likely.

I missed that post I think (or forgot) my bad. I am just looking at the depth chart and noticing that we are lacking at OG and Danzey is a 2 year solution. I don't see why we would take potentially 3 CBs and 3 WRs in this class.

Also we can't sign 28 because we only ahve 2 EE I thought.... am I missing something?

Didn't CAP, Bradley and Danzey all get enrolled ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know about Malzahn's blocking scheme but is Robinson cut out to be a pulling guard? (Gus pulls a lot of guards if I remember correctly)

As I posted in TD the coaches want to add the best players they can at these positions to what is committed: 1 RB (2 if JW flips), 1 H Back, 1 OL, 2 WR, 1 DT, 2 LBs, 1 to 2 CBs, and 2 Safeties. With the 15 committed now the coaches are looking at signing 25 to 27 and they will push to sign a full class, which is 28. We have 64 on scholly now with the 3 EEs so including them we can sign 24 right now. Having 4 more picees of attrition to allow for a full 28 is very likely.

I missed that post I think (or forgot) my bad. I am just looking at the depth chart and noticing that we are lacking at OG and Danzey is a 2 year solution. I don't see why we would take potentially 3 CBs and 3 WRs in this class.

Also we can't sign 28 because we only ahve 2 EE I thought.... am I missing something?

Didn't CAP, Bradley and Danzey all get enrolled ?

Danzey has not yet. He is planning to this week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...