Police reports detail Michael Jackson's child pornography collection

[AU-24 3,099]

No one INCLUDING YOU had access to the DA's evidence.......................I'm certain you have no idea how that works, or anything else for that matter..........

I'm not defending his actions, MY OPINION, is that he was as guilty as the day is long..............The only problem ANY ONE had with your post was that you tried to make it about liberals being complicit with what Jackson did. Again, EVERY major network covered the trials EVERY moment........No one hid anything............

That is as moronic as anything you've ever posted and there has been a lot of that.............I originally placed you on ignore based on your football posts................when you started posting in this forum, never has a more correct ignore decision been made.

You're a moron...................buzz off..................don't engage me anymore..............I waste as little time on idiots as possible and you have now been given far more than enough and certainly more than is worth the effort.....

My obvious point (that you and the liberals fully realize). Who is it that "covered this up" from the public, for all of these years now, since his first trail and then since his death? If no one hid anything, why is this just now coming out? Why was it covered up in the first place? I mean a collection of child porn and animal sacrifices?

Did Jackson act alone? So not one maid, servant, cook, gardner, zoo keeper, friend or family member new of these actions and didn't report it? Should others be held accountable if they knew and did nothing? Had could others not know?

[telling tiger 156]

Didn't and won't bother to unblock it and read............if it was even for me..................just don't care enough about your opinions of this or anything else for it to matter....Have a great day.

[TitanTiger 20,489]

Also, when Jackson was on trial, even his arrival and his families arrival at court, was covered by every network LIVE..............it isn't like it was ignored or swept under any rugs...................If you didn't know it was happening at the time, you were comatose.

Jackson turned it into such a media circus, not that he needed any help, he was standing on top of an SUV, waving at "fans".....

So at the time of his trail there was no child porn or animal sacrifices were swept under the rug? It was all out there for the public to see and protect innocent children and animals from this mad sick-o?

If this info is from any police report while the sick freak was alive, he should have been brought up on child porn charges to go along with the other charges. To my knowledge he never was. That's pretty much the definition of something getting swept under the rug. Are we really at the point where we defend child porn/child molesters based on party lines and not liking the source of facts? No wonder our moral compass is broken. To many people are completely morally bankrupt and not even ashamed to be so.

I thought maybe just one, just one liberal might agree this is another case of political correctness going wild...but no!

Because it's not political correctness, you dumbass. And it's not a liberal vs conservative issue.

These are police records that the general public didn't have access to before now. At the time of his trial it was covered wall to wall by every news outlet imaginable to the extent they were allowed to by the judge. The "librul media" weren't sweeping it under the rug for "one of their own", they simply had no access to this information.

If you want to know why it was only released now, you'd have to ask the police. But that doesn't point to some liberal media conspiracy. That's just you being dumb and trying to shoehorn some political angle into it that isn't warranted.

[homersapien 11,382]

I'm going to need a different source besides one that also offers an article of "Elvis baby mama claims it was murder"

What? You're going to need a different source? So this is a perfect example of the liberal media covering-up one of their own, so the ignorant masses (like yourself) don't believe it's possible.

WTF???

You are clearly delusional. You probably check under your bed at night to make sure there's not a liberal boogeyman hiding there.

[homersapien 11,382]

Also, when Jackson was on trial, even his arrival and his families arrival at court, was covered by every network LIVE..............it isn't like it was ignored or swept under any rugs...................If you didn't know it was happening at the time, you were comatose.

Jackson turned it into such a media circus, not that he needed any help, he was standing on top of an SUV, waving at "fans".....

So at the time of his trail there was no child porn or animal sacrifices were swept under the rug? It was all out there for the public to see and protect innocent children and animals from this mad sick-o?

If this info is from any police report while the sick freak was alive, he should have been brought up on child porn charges to go along with the other charges. To my knowledge he never was. That's pretty much the definition of something getting swept under the rug. Are we really at the point where we defend child porn/child molesters based on party lines and not liking the source of facts? No wonder our moral compass is broken. To many people are completely morally bankrupt and not even ashamed to be so.

Boy, did you ever miss the point. Mr. Delusional here is trying to make that point about the press, or liberals, or something.....

So, do you agree with him?

[homersapien 11,382]

No one INCLUDING YOU had access to the DA's evidence.......................I'm certain you have no idea how that works, or anything else for that matter..........

I'm not defending his actions, MY OPINION, is that he was as guilty as the day is long..............The only problem ANY ONE had with your post was that you tried to make it about liberals being complicit with what Jackson did. Again, EVERY major network covered the trials EVERY moment........No one hid anything............

That is as moronic as anything you've ever posted and there has been a lot of that.............I originally placed you on ignore based on your football posts................when you started posting in this forum, never has a more correct ignore decision been made.

You're a moron...................buzz off..................don't engage me anymore..............I waste as little time on idiots as possible and you have now been given far more than enough and certainly more than is worth the effort.....

My obvious point (that you and the liberals fully realize). Who is it that "covered this up" from the public, for all of these years now, since his first trail and then since his death? If no one hid anything, why is this just now coming out? Why was it covered up in the first place? I mean a collection of child porn and animal sacrifices?

Did Jackson act alone? So not one maid, servant, cook, gardner, zoo keeper, friend or family member new of these actions and didn't report it? Should others be held accountable if they knew and did nothing? Had could others not know?

Well, obviously, they are all liberals. :-\

[FoundationEagle 637]

Also, when Jackson was on trial, even his arrival and his families arrival at court, was covered by every network LIVE..............it isn't like it was ignored or swept under any rugs...................If you didn't know it was happening at the time, you were comatose.

Jackson turned it into such a media circus, not that he needed any help, he was standing on top of an SUV, waving at "fans".....

So at the time of his trail there was no child porn or animal sacrifices were swept under the rug? It was all out there for the public to see and protect innocent children and animals from this mad sick-o?

If this info is from any police report while the sick freak was alive, he should have been brought up on child porn charges to go along with the other charges. To my knowledge he never was. That's pretty much the definition of something getting swept under the rug. Are we really at the point where we defend child porn/child molesters based on party lines and not liking the source of facts? No wonder our moral compass is broken. To many people are completely morally bankrupt and not even ashamed to be so.

Boy, did you ever miss the point. Mr. Delusional here is trying to make that point about the press, or liberals, or something.....

So, do you agree with him?

I don't agree that the press covered up for a liberal. I did notice that the only ones on this thread either disregarding the claim or the evidence are self proclaimed liberals. This should be met with disgust and anger from both conservatives and liberals and all in between. It's disingenuous to claim the press covered for him also. They didn't have this info either. The only reason I mentioned party lines is there are only members of one party making any kind of defense or excuse for this or trying to discredit the info. Nothing more. So do you agree that defending this no matter the reason is flat out disgusting and shows clear bias based on ones personal beliefs about a source? Turning this into an attack on one poster because he incorrectly blamed the media rather than discussing the actual facts is wholly incorrect. Let's let an ignorant comment go and quit making this political and choosing sides. Everyone should be outraged, period.

[TitanTiger 20,489]

I did notice that the only ones on this thread either disregarding the claim or the evidence are self proclaimed liberals.

Well 1) that is patently false as I am not a liberal and 2) the reason you see more responses from liberals overall is that it's liberals who the OP accused of somehow protecting "one of their own."

This should be met with disgust and anger from both conservatives and liberals and all in between. It's disingenuous to claim the press covered for him also. They didn't have this info either. The only reason I mentioned party lines is there are only members of one party making any kind of defense or excuse for this or trying to discredit the info. Nothing more. So do you agree that defending this no matter the reason is flat out disgusting and shows clear bias based on ones personal beliefs about a source? Turning this into an attack on one poster because he incorrectly blamed the media rather than discussing the actual facts is wholly incorrect. Let's let an ignorant comment go and quit making this political and choosing sides. Everyone should be outraged, period.

No one is discrediting the info. They are discrediting his mischaracterization of it.

He's getting attacked because he not only incorrectly accused the "liberal" media, but continued to double down on it even after that fact was shown to him. On top of that he keeps trying to paint this as some black mark on liberals, referring to MJ as "one of their [liberals] own."

No one turned it into anything. The OP took a story that had zero to do with politics or liberals vs conservatives and made it that way. He rightly got smacked down for it.

[icanthearyou 4,463]

Also, when Jackson was on trial, even his arrival and his families arrival at court, was covered by every network LIVE..............it isn't like it was ignored or swept under any rugs...................If you didn't know it was happening at the time, you were comatose.

Jackson turned it into such a media circus, not that he needed any help, he was standing on top of an SUV, waving at "fans".....

So at the time of his trail there was no child porn or animal sacrifices were swept under the rug? It was all out there for the public to see and protect innocent children and animals from this mad sick-o?

If this info is from any police report while the sick freak was alive, he should have been brought up on child porn charges to go along with the other charges. To my knowledge he never was. That's pretty much the definition of something getting swept under the rug. Are we really at the point where we defend child porn/child molesters based on party lines and not liking the source of facts? No wonder our moral compass is broken. To many people are completely morally bankrupt and not even ashamed to be so.

Boy, did you ever miss the point. Mr. Delusional here is trying to make that point about the press, or liberals, or something.....

So, do you agree with him?

I don't agree that the press covered up for a liberal. I did notice that the only ones on this thread either disregarding the claim or the evidence are self proclaimed liberals. This should be met with disgust and anger from both conservatives and liberals and all in between. It's disingenuous to claim the press covered for him also. They didn't have this info either. The only reason I mentioned party lines is there are only members of one party making any kind of defense or excuse for this or trying to discredit the info. Nothing more. So do you agree that defending this no matter the reason is flat out disgusting and shows clear bias based on ones personal beliefs about a source? Turning this into an attack on one poster because he incorrectly blamed the media rather than discussing the actual facts is wholly incorrect. Let's let an ignorant comment go and quit making this political and choosing sides. Everyone should be outraged, period.

Sounds rather duplicitous and disingenuous. Defending the OP while condemning the OP. You can't have it both ways.

[telling tiger 156]

I did notice that the only ones on this thread either disregarding the claim or the evidence are self proclaimed liberals.

Well 1) that is patently false as I am not a liberal and 2) the reason you see more responses from liberals overall is that it's liberals who the OP accused of somehow protecting "one of their own."

This should be met with disgust and anger from both conservatives and liberals and all in between. It's disingenuous to claim the press covered for him also. They didn't have this info either. The only reason I mentioned party lines is there are only members of one party making any kind of defense or excuse for this or trying to discredit the info. Nothing more. So do you agree that defending this no matter the reason is flat out disgusting and shows clear bias based on ones personal beliefs about a source? Turning this into an attack on one poster because he incorrectly blamed the media rather than discussing the actual facts is wholly incorrect. Let's let an ignorant comment go and quit making this political and choosing sides. Everyone should be outraged, period.

No one is discrediting the info. They are discrediting his mischaracterization of it.

He's getting attacked because he not only incorrectly accused the "liberal" media, but continued to double down on it even after that fact was shown to him. On top of that he keeps trying to paint this as some black mark on liberals, referring to MJ as "one of their [liberals] own."

No one turned it into anything. The OP took a story that had zero to do with politics or liberals vs conservatives and made it that way. He rightly got smacked down for it.

This........This right here, in total....................ANY responses to the OP had nothing to do with the subject matter. It was ONLY about the use of it to score what he thought would be easy political points. NOT going to happen.

[FoundationEagle 637]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

[icanthearyou 4,463]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

[FoundationEagle 637]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

[icanthearyou 4,463]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

Sorry, I do not wish to play with you anymore. I already know too many self-righteous victims.

[TitanTiger 20,489]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

They didn't "want" to discuss it at all! It was thrust upon them because the OPs idiotic post and follow-ups accused the "liberal media" and other liberals of covering up for "one of their own."

Have you followed this discussion at all?

[FoundationEagle 637]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

Sorry, I do not wish to play with you anymore. I already know too many self-righteous victims.

Lmao. Still attacking, not discussing. I know 100 percent everything I need to know about you now.

[TitanTiger 20,489]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

Sorry, I do not wish to play with you anymore. I already know too many self-righteous victims.

Lmao. Still attacking, not discussing. I know 100 percent everything I need to know about you now.

^^^ clueless

[FoundationEagle 637]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

Sorry, I do not wish to play with you anymore. I already know too many self-righteous victims.

Lmao. Still attacking, not discussing. I know 100 percent everything I need to know about you now.

^^^ clueless

Yep. Clueless as to why people on this forum spend all their time attacking people instead of actually discussing issues. Still NO ONE has a true thought on the real topic. I don't subscribe to the constant political attacks on here, which seems strange to those here. I'm sure somehow that means I'm clueless again, right? Back to your regular scheduled program of attacking each other and never having a shred of a meaningful discussion. Peace.

[TitanTiger 20,489]

I never even mentioned the discussion on the blaming liberals. It was thrust upon me by those wanting to only discuss that instead of the real issue. I was discussing the actual topic. Apparently people here are more interested in attacking someone than discussing actual issues. That goes for both sides.

Are you serious? Who was it who told you that no one has the right to criticize you?

Are you serious? I wanted to discuss the actual issue as I have now said several times and you are so put off by that idea that you want to attack me? Wow that is really sad. Proof of absolutely everything I said above. Just ridiculous. There's a reason most people steer clear of this forum. This is exactly why.

Sorry, I do not wish to play with you anymore. I already know too many self-righteous victims.

Lmao. Still attacking, not discussing. I know 100 percent everything I need to know about you now.

^^^ clueless

Yep. Clueless as to why people on this forum spend all their time attacking people instead of actually discussing issues. Still NO ONE has a true thought on the real topic. I don't subscribe to the constant political attacks on here, which seems strange to those here. I'm sure somehow that means I'm clueless again, right? Back to your regular scheduled program of attacking each other and never having a shred of a meaningful discussion. Peace.

No, you're clueless because you don't ******* pay attention to what you're reading.

They didn't "want" to discuss it at all! It was thrust upon them because the OPs idiotic post and follow-ups accused the "liberal media" and other liberals of covering up for "one of their own." That is the ONLY reason this topic went down a political path - not because of liberals unwilling to discuss MJ's sick habits, but because AU-24 decided to turn this into a brickbat to bash liberals and the 'liberal media' with.

Get up to speed before blathering nonsense.

[FoundationEagle 637]

I already said that should not have been done. Maybe you should read yourself. I have tried multiple times now to change the topic away from politics and you people all refuse. That's why I say good day. Enjoy your debauchery.

[cole256 17,084]

Drama queens....smh

[TitanTiger 20,489]

I already said that should not have been done. Maybe you should read yourself. I have tried multiple times now to change the topic away from politics and you people all refuse. That's why I say good day. Enjoy your debauchery.

I did read. For instance, I could read that you were talking out of both sides of your mouth. Then I saw you proceed to defend the OP in effect by acting as if it were other people's fault that it went down this path and that they were somehow unwilling to discuss the issue.

You want to discuss MJ? Fine. Manage to do it without acting like the side that got attacked is somehow responsible for the conversation going south.

[homersapien 11,382]

Also, when Jackson was on trial, even his arrival and his families arrival at court, was covered by every network LIVE..............it isn't like it was ignored or swept under any rugs...................If you didn't know it was happening at the time, you were comatose.

Jackson turned it into such a media circus, not that he needed any help, he was standing on top of an SUV, waving at "fans".....

So at the time of his trail there was no child porn or animal sacrifices were swept under the rug? It was all out there for the public to see and protect innocent children and animals from this mad sick-o?

If this info is from any police report while the sick freak was alive, he should have been brought up on child porn charges to go along with the other charges. To my knowledge he never was. That's pretty much the definition of something getting swept under the rug. Are we really at the point where we defend child porn/child molesters based on party lines and not liking the source of facts? No wonder our moral compass is broken. To many people are completely morally bankrupt and not even ashamed to be so.

Boy, did you ever miss the point. Mr. Delusional here is trying to make that point about the press, or liberals, or something.....

So, do you agree with him?

I don't agree that the press covered up for a liberal. I did notice that the only ones on this thread either disregarding the claim or the evidence are self proclaimed liberals. This should be met with disgust and anger from both conservatives and liberals and all in between. It's disingenuous to claim the press covered for him also. They didn't have this info either. The only reason I mentioned party lines is there are only members of one party making any kind of defense or excuse for this or trying to discredit the info. Nothing more. So do you agree that defending this no matter the reason is flat out disgusting and shows clear bias based on ones personal beliefs about a source? Turning this into an attack on one poster because he incorrectly blamed the media rather than discussing the actual facts is wholly incorrect. Let's let an ignorant comment go and quit making this political and choosing sides. Everyone should be outraged, period.

I don't see anyone defending Jackson. Please point that out.

All I see are people refuting the idiotic point being proposed by the OP - that this is something that liberals or the liberal press are trying to cover up. He is the only person trying to twist this into some sort of partisan issue and that's what prompted the (justified) reaction.

Exhibit A, post #3:

channonc, on Yesterday, 09:11 PM, said:

Political correctness??? Must everything be about you being a victim?

So even in cases of child porn you will defend the liberals and the liberal media? That is just sad.

[FoundationEagle 637]

I already said that should not have been done. Maybe you should read yourself. I have tried multiple times now to change the topic away from politics and you people all refuse. That's why I say good day. Enjoy your debauchery.

I did read. For instance, I could read that you were talking out of both sides of your mouth. Then I saw you proceed to defend the OP in effect by acting as if it were other people's fault that it went down this path and that they were somehow unwilling to discuss the issue.

You want to discuss MJ? Fine. Manage to do it without acting like the side that got attacked is somehow responsible for the conversation going south.

All you've proven is that one idiot can make a comment and trap everyone else in a completely useless discussion. Laugh at it, call it ridiculous and move on. Continuing this discussion this far only fuels the idiotic fire. I've said it was wrong. End of story.

Last attempt.

MJ apparently had an entire room full of things for the sole purpose of child moleststion. How is it that this was never revealed before now? Who had to cover this up? Police chief? AG? Someone had to intentionally hide this info.

[homersapien 11,382]

I already said that should not have been done. Maybe you should read yourself. I have tried multiple times now to change the topic away from politics and you people all refuse. That's why I say good day. Enjoy your debauchery.

Some idiot claims the disgusting facts about Michael Jackson were hidden due to liberals and and he gets justified reaction from such a stupid statement.

And now that reaction constitutes "debauchery" in your mind?

You have no mind.