IronMan70 3,277 Posted February 6, 2022 Share Posted February 6, 2022 (edited) Don't know where all this stands at this hour but this is what Nick Brahms tweeted about an hour ago. There are also some interesting comments from Auburn fans supporting him and the other team leaders. Many of the responders also tagged CBH and Green. Edited February 7, 2022 by IronMan70 5 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weagl1 1,785 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Good for Nick and the other players. They should have a big voice in whatever happens. They are impacted the most. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gowebb11 9,339 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 (edited) The admin needs to pay VERY close attention to Nicks request, particularly the other names of players involved. Good for them for standing up for their team and program. Edited February 7, 2022 by Gowebb11 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdgeneration 6,469 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Problem is, if the allegations are true, the president and AD will not be able to discuss any personnel issues with them. Maybe they can say that “We have proof of fireable offenses.” But not a lot more than that. I’m not sure the players will get too much out of the meeting. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cbo 7,861 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, 3rdgeneration said: Problem is, if the allegations are true, the president and AD will not be able to discuss any personnel issues with them. Maybe they can say that “We have proof of fireable offenses.” But not a lot more than that. I’m not sure the players will get too much out of the meeting. Very good point that I had not considered. Although I imagine it would mean something to them just to be heard. And I think they are owed that. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdgeneration 6,469 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 7 minutes ago, cbo said: Very good point that I had not considered. Although I imagine it would mean something to them just to be heard. And I think they are owed that. I agree that they should be heard. It can be frustrating if you get no answers. The AD and president need to be as honest and forthcoming and understanding as possible. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTNupe11 2,034 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 18 minutes ago, 3rdgeneration said: Problem is, if the allegations are true, the president and AD will not be able to discuss any personnel issues with them. Maybe they can say that “We have proof of fireable offenses.” But not a lot more than that. I’m not sure the players will get too much out of the meeting. They can and should discuss personnel issues with members of the team if the players may have personal knowledge of it. They should not be precluded if they can provide insight as part of the investigation that is. Assuming its not complete. If not, they should ask general questions about Harsin's leadership and just listen. There is a right (and legal) way to do all this. It's not particularly rocket science. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gowebb11 9,339 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 23 minutes ago, 3rdgeneration said: Problem is, if the allegations are true, the president and AD will not be able to discuss any personnel issues with them. Maybe they can say that “We have proof of fireable offenses.” But not a lot more than that. I’m not sure the players will get too much out of the meeting. Then again, maybe they have seen or heard some things and have important info relevant to the situation. No way to know unless you talk to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdgeneration 6,469 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 4 minutes ago, GTNupe11 said: They can and should discuss personnel issues with members of the team if the players may have personal knowledge of it. They should not be precluded if they can provide insight as part of the investigation that is. Assuming its not complete. If not, they should ask general questions about Harsin's leadership and just listen. There is a right (and legal) way to do all this. It's not particularly rocket science. And I forgot the fact that it is a public institution, so everything will come to light anyway. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWALA Tiger 3,535 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 2 hours ago, IronMan70 said: Don't know where all this stands at this hour but this is what Nick Brahms tweeted about an hour ago. Also, read some of the responses of all the Auburn fans supporting him and the other team leaders. Looks like CBH and Green are being copied with these responses too. Them not having been talked to by the decision makers tells u all u need to know. This is more than Harsin being mean or not caring about players. It's much deeper than that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au302 2,669 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 27 minutes ago, NWALA Tiger said: Them not having been talked to by the decision makers tells u all u need to know. This is more than Harsin being mean or not caring about players. It's much deeper than that Well, looks like both Harsin and the university fixing to get exposed. Doesn't matter how egregious it is or how slam dunk of a case, he has a right to his day and court. The university and others better make sure they don't have any skeletons. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gman87 398 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 49 minutes ago, NWALA Tiger said: Them not having been talked to by the decision makers tells u all u need to know. This is more than Harsin being mean or not caring about players. It's much deeper than that That's a leap of Evil Knevil proportions. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oracle79 3,569 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 2 hours ago, 3rdgeneration said: Problem is, if the allegations are true, the president and AD will not be able to discuss any personnel issues with them. Maybe they can say that “We have proof of fireable offenses.” But not a lot more than that. I’m not sure the players will get too much out of the meeting. What allegations? Affair with an employee? Racism? Being a hardass? Not talking to parents? I'm definitely curious as to what may be a fireable offense? Does FOIA apply for a public university? I hope Harsin has the balls to make them fire him if this is all a power grab by POTB. Burn this incestuous, nepotistic, crony capitalistic university to the ground if it's a baseless jetgate type fiasco. I may be done with this redneck good ole boy outfit either way. Tired of watching ground hog day and brother in law dropping and breaking jelly glasses so we can't have nice things. 1 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NWALA Tiger 3,535 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 21 minutes ago, gman87 said: That's a leap of Evil Knevil proportions. How so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randman5000 4,229 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Seems strange to have not talked to the leaders of team. Maybe it's happening now, but they've already made their decision 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wcware 1,365 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 (edited) 7 hours ago, Randman5000 said: Seems strange to have not talked to the leaders of team. Maybe it's happening now, but they've already made their decision When or if all of the players supporting Harsin leave, where does that leave us? What if it’s a huge number? This will be fun interesting to watch. Edited February 7, 2022 by wcware Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metafour 4,969 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 7 hours ago, Randman5000 said: Seems strange to have not talked to the leaders of team. Maybe it's happening now, but they've already made their decision Alan Greene already spoke with the team. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CCTAU 3,334 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 5 hours ago, metafour said: Alan Greene already spoke with the team. He spoke AT the team… 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco 617 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Love Nick Brahms but he’s speaking out of his ass on this one. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUGoo 2,664 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 17 minutes ago, Taco said: Love Nick Brahms but he’s speaking out of his ass on this one. What makes you say that? It appears to me he is being a leader and wanting to keep the team informed as well as give the teams 2 cents. I have seen nothing definitive anywhere. It is all hearsay to us until it's not. i would imagine the players are the same way . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hay Field 101 630 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 22 minutes ago, Taco said: Love Nick Brahms but he’s speaking out of his ass on this one. why is that ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bootskii 264 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Just now, AUGoo said: What makes you say that? It appears to me he is being a leader and wanting to keep the team informed as well as give the teams 2 cents. I have seen nothing definitive anywhere. It is all hearsay to us until it's not. i would imagine the players are the same way . Have to agree Goo. Players are the most to win and lose in this situation. I feel Nick wants real answers and likes the way the program is heading under Harsin. Nothing wrong with fighting for something that you want and believe in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taco 617 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 5 minutes ago, AUGoo said: What makes you say that? It appears to me he is being a leader and wanting to keep the team informed as well as give the teams 2 cents. I have seen nothing definitive anywhere. It is all hearsay to us until it's not. i would imagine the players are the same way . Players met with AD Greene and a select few stuck around longer to further address the situation. Two of the people he tagged was there to further address the situation. I think even Hokanson reported this in his premium boards. It could have been PM idk, but people with info know Brahms is speaking out of his ass. He may not know what’s going on, and he’s just doing what he may believe is right, but he doesn’t know the full extent of even what’s going on regarding meetings with the AD 5 minutes ago, bootskii said: Have to agree Goo. Players are the most to win and lose in this situation. I feel Nick wants real answers and likes the way the program is heading under Harsin. Nothing wrong with fighting for something that you want and believe in. Nick is in his last year so he’s gone regardless, so no he’s not go the most to win or lose in this situation. And players don’t know what’s best for them if it hit them upside the head half the time. Most people in athletics understand this. He’s acting as a fan, and fans are fickle. im sure I’ll get a lot of hate for this post, I tried to avoid it but I just had to say my peace. Let it commence. But Harsin absolutely should not be the man, unless you’re okay with just chilling in the middle with the Mississippi teams, Missouri, USCe, and whatever mid-tier SEC football program when we have the money to spend like the Georgia’s, A&Ms, and Bamas of the world. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUGoo 2,664 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 Gotcha Taco. Stand I Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
metafour 4,969 Posted February 7, 2022 Share Posted February 7, 2022 1 hour ago, CCTAU said: He spoke AT the team… He interviewed players as part of AU's investigation into the allegations. Notice how Brahm's Tweet is going ABOVE Alan Greene? He wants to meet with the President and BOT...because the AD already spoke to the players. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now