Jump to content

Schools need competition now

Tiger in Spain

Recommended Posts

This week's back-to-school ads offer amazing bargains on lightweight backpacks and nifty school supplies. All those businesses scramble to offer us good stuff at low prices. It's amazing what competition does for consumers. The power to say no to one business and yes to another is awesome.

Too bad we don't apply that idea to schools themselves.

Education bureaucrats and teachers unions are against it. They insist they must dictate where kids go to school, what they study, and when. When I went on TV to say that it's a myth that a government monopoly can educate kids effectively, hundreds of union teachers demonstrated outside my office demanding that I apologize and "re-educate" myself by teaching for a week. (I'll show you the demonstration and what happened next this Friday night, when ABC updates my "Stupid in America" TV special.)

The teachers union didn't like my "government monopoly" comment, but even the late Albert Shanker, once president of the American Federation of Teachers, admitted that our schools are virtual monopolies of the state -- run pretty much like Cuban and North Korean schools. He said, "It's time to admit that the public education system operates like a planned economy, a bureaucratic system in which everybody's role is spelled out in advance and there are few incentives for innovation and productivity. It's no surprise that our school system doesn't improve. It more resembles the communist economy than our own market economy."

When a government monopoly limits competition, we can't know what ideas would bloom if competition were allowed. Surveys show that most American parents are satisfied with their kids' public schools, but that's only because they don't know what their kids might have had!

As Nobel Prize-winning economist F.A. Hayek wrote, "[C]ompetition is valuable only because, and so far as, its results are unpredictable and on the whole different from those which anyone has, or could have, deliberately aimed at."

What Hayek means is that no mortal being can imagine what improvements a competitive market would bring.

But I'll try anyway: I bet we'd see cheap and efficient Costco-like schools, virtual schools where you learn at home on your computer, sports schools, music schools, schools that go all year, schools with uniforms, schools that open early and keep kids later, and, who knows what?

Every economics textbook says monopolies are bad because they charge high prices for shoddy goods. But it's government that gives us monopolies. So why do we entrust something as important as our children's education to a government monopoly?

The monopoly fails so many kids that more than a million parents now make big sacrifices to homeschool their kids. Two percent of school-aged kids are homeschooled now. If parents weren't taxed to pay for lousy government schools, more might teach their kids at home.

Some parents choose to homeschool for religious reasons, but homeschooling has been increasing by 10 percent a year because so many parents are just fed up with the government's schools.

Homeschooled students blow past their public-school counterparts in terms of achievement. Brian Ray, who taught in both public and private schools before becoming president of the National Home Education Research Institute, says, "In study after study, children who learn at home consistently score 15-30 percentile points above the national averages," he says. Homeschooled kids also score almost 10 percent higher than the average American high school student on the ACT.

I don't know how these homeschooling parents do it. I couldn't do it. I'd get impatient and fight with my kids too much.

But it works for lots of kids and parents. So do private schools. It's time to give parents more options.

Instead of pouring more money into the failed government monopoly, let's free parents to control their own education money. Competition is a lot smarter than bureaucrats.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Man, AFT and the NEA will be over to correctlyu indoctrinate you Bro.

Here, repeat it with me: "Competition is Bad. Competition is Bad. Competition is Bad. Competition is Bad."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boy, talk about my MAJOR HOT BUTTON: The complete idiocy of the modern education system. As it stands today, the average kids must go through 18 years of school before getting a college degree, now deemed the prerequisite to earn a decent living.

My proposal? Burn the entire rotten, creakng edifice to the ground. Because the education system is just that--A system. A reflexive, mindless, bureaucratic swamp that employs millions of civil servants, generates mountains of paper, sucks hundreds of billions out of the Gross Domestic Product, and effectively crushes the souls of children. Yet it does a crappy job at its core mission: Educating our children.

Instead, we should be doing the following:

1) Instead of the bright kids and the dumb kids marching together in lock step for 14 years from Kindergarten to High School graduation, we should have a way for bright kids to move forward a lot faster. In second grade, my son was testing at sixth grade level across the board, and was sitting in class bored out of his cotton-pickng skull. Yet, the school wanted to simply bump him up to third grade and have him effectively imprisoned for another. Instead, we lobbied hard to get him double promoted. Guess what? He made all As. And for every kid like my son, there are thousands of parents who just were thwarted by the system.

So once a kid masters multiplication, move him to fractions. Then algebra and geometry. Then calculus. Because the more challenged he is, the more enthusiastic he'll be, rather than the burnout that comes from catatonic boredom in the classroom every day.

Guess what happens? The kids work harder, knowing that they finish school years earlier than if they had to slog through the old standard curriculum. Personally, I think the more 14-year-olds you have in college, the better.

2) Once kids get to high school, whatever age they may be, give them the option of choosing a college prep curriculum or a trade school curriculum. Last time I checked, electricians, mechanics, and plumbers made excellent money. And a lot of those kids just aren't interested in reading Hamlet. Moving them on to a more rewarding curriculum means that interested kids get more out of the class.

3) Stop worrying about socializing kids, and just worry about teaching them. Self esteem comes from accomplishment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Members Online

    No members to show

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Create New...