Jump to content

Bill Clinton's 'win' with only 43% of the vote is less legitimate than Trump's ...


AURaptor

Recommended Posts





  • Replies 50
  • Created
  • Last Reply
17 hours ago, AURaptor said:

and yet, there were no wide spread, massive  appeals to boycott HIS Inauguration, or rallies by the Right to close down businesses, schools,  streets and cities. 

When the Left is defeated in a Presidential election, they will scream, whine, wail, gnash their teeth and erupt w/ the most inane, empty claims and cries of bigotry, fascism, racism, homophobia, .... no matter WHO it is from the Right that wins.

Because that is all the Left has to offer. They are void of any substance, and filled with only fear mongering, hatred, vitriol and division. 

You'd think that after 40 years of seeing this routine over and over, ( going back to Nixon ) that the Press would have clued in by now, only 1 problem. THEY are the ones whining, wailing, and gnashing their teeth as well !! 


:roflol:

Perhaps, however, they have not produced an administration as destructive as that of W. Bush.  Those egotistical, globalist, masterminds almost created an unrecoverable scenario.

But, do not allow me to dissuade you from the foolish notion that your team is awesome, perfect, has all the right answers.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

To make this comparison work, wouldn't the Dems need to be boycotting Trump because he's a fervent capitalist?  

Do you think capitalism is the reason for any of these boycotts?

Brings about an interesting point.  Is there any difference between exploitation capitalism and communism?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AURaptor said:

Homer - admit I proved you wrong 

It is no longer necessary for anyone to prove you wrong, disingenuous, or deceptive.  You consistently do that yourself.  

You and Blue have made yourselves clowns.  Not by your partisanship or ideology but rather, based on your absolute indoctrination and, your willingness to believe, or deny, whatever the latest narrative, rhetoric, fake news dictates.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, icanthearyou said:

It is no longer necessary for anyone to prove you wrong, disingenuous, or deceptive.  You consistently do that yourself.  

I proved Homer to be wrong. You know this , thus your post is nonsensical. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, icanthearyou said:

My dogs better than your dog?  

The only information that can be gleaned from this thread is, that Raptor is the most childish, simplistic, misinformed, indoctrinated of the true believers.

You describe yourself & the other Leftist apologists as I routinely knock your mindless dolts to the ground with verified facts you simply choose to ignore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AURaptor said:

I proved Homer to be wrong. You know this , thus your post is nonsensical. 

Yes Raptor.  You did.  You have never been wrong.  You are as perfect and pure as the Republican Party.  You're a true patriot....  As far as you know.

 

Raptor is an indoctrinated sheep who knows nothing about the nature of power and politics.  All he knows is Red team good, blue team bad.  Anyone who is yet to understand this basic fact is either Blue or, an as yet unidentified, absolutely indoctrinated clown sheep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AURaptor said:

You describe yourself & the other Leftist apologists as I routinely knock your mindless dolts to the ground with verified facts you simply choose to ignore.

I know.  I'm just a leftist apologist, registered Republican, who hates this country and wants to destroy it.  I'm a card carrying Marxist, Bolshevik, terrorist, atheist, gay loving, minority loving, tree hugging, abortion loving, Anti-American.

I love the Blue team.  I want them to win every game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

See ? Your childish, false pride can't even admit the most basic & true things. 

 

 You instead go on these weird phony tangents instead of simply admitting the facts.  It must be so painful for you to simply acknowledge  something so truthful and honest. 

 

 Why is that? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AURaptor said:

See ? Your childish, false pride can't even admit the most basic & true things. 

 

 You instead go on these weird phony tangents instead of simply admitting the facts.  It must be so painful for you to simply acknowledge  something so truthful and honest. 

 

 Why is that? 

You're correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one seriously accused Reagan or Bush of promoting or favorably viewing communism. Unlike obama, so those lame pics are a total fail. 

 

Also, Hillary started the whole " birther " + questioning obama's  authentic Americanism. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AURaptor said:

No one seriously accused Reagan or Bush of promoting or favorably viewing communism. Unlike obama, so those lame pics are a total fail. 

 

Also, Hillary started the whole " birther " + questioning obama's  authentic Americanism. 

 

 

No serious person accused Obama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TexasTiger said:

No serious person accused Obama.

They don't  have to. He does so himself, by his history, his own words, deeds,  and with who he surrounds himself . Willfully ignorant claim he's just some guy, not all that Left of center... 

 

All the President's Mao

President Obama and "the other side of Barack's brain," Valerie Jarrett  --  whose stepfather coincidentally maintained close ties with the President's adolescent mentor and Communist, Frank Marshall Davis  --  handpicked the following bureaucrats and placed them in positions of great authority, power, and visibility: 
 
Van Jones, "Green Jobs Czar," self-defined Communist. 
 
Ron Bloom, "Manufacturing Czar" cites Chairman Mao as a political guide.
 
Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director, who stated in an address to high school students this past June that Chairman Mao Tse-tung was one of the two "philosophers" she most often turns to. 
 
President Obama handpicked and placed the Socialists and socialist sympathizers in positions of great authority and visibility: 
 
Carol Browner, Director, White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy, an ardent Socialist activist and one of 14 leaders of Socialist International's, "Commission for a Sustainable World Society," which calls for "global governance."
 
Cass Sunstein, Administrator of the White House Office of Administration and Regulatory Affairs , "who openly argues for bringing socialism to the United States, and even lends support for communism...."
 
How many others, handpicked by Mr. Obama and Ms. Jarrett, are there?  
 
Here is China's Communist Chairman, Mao Tse-tung (whose Maoname, oddly enough means, "to shine on the East") in his own words, at the age of 24, before he became supreme ruler of all China as well as the mass murderer responsible for the death of 70,000,000 people  --  in peacetime:
 
Mao expressed the central elements in his own character, which stayed consistent for the remaining six decades of his life and defined his rule.
 
Mao's attitude to morality consisted of one core, the self, "I," above everything else: 
 
"I do not agree with the view that to be moral, the motive of one's action has to be benefiting others.  Morality does not have to be defined in relation to others... People like me want to ... satisfy our hearts to the full, and in doing so we automatically have the most valuable moral codes.  Of course there are people and objects in the world, but they are all there only for me."* 
 
Mao shunned all constraints of responsibility and duty. 
 
"People like me only have a duty to ourselves; we have no duty to other people." "I am responsible only for the reality that I know," he wrote, "and absolutely not responsible for anything else.  I don't know about the past.  I don't know about the future.  They have nothing to do with the reality of my own self."
 
He explicitly rejected any responsibility  towards future generations.
 
"Some say one has a responsibility for history.  I don't believe it.  I am only concerned about developing myself... I have my desire and act on it I am responsible to no one.
 
....
 
He argued that conscience could go to hell if it was in conflict with his impulses:
 
"These two should be one and the same.  All our actions...are driven by impulse, and the conscience that is wise goes along with this in every instance."
 
....
 
When he came to the question, "How do we change [China]?"  Mao laid the utmost emphasis on destruction: 
 
"...the country must be...destroyed and then re-formed."
 
He extended this line not just to China but to the whole world   --   and event the universe: 
 
"This applies to the country, the nation, and to mankind... The destruction of the universe is the same... People like me long for its destruction, because when the old universe is  destroyed, a new universe will be formed.  Isn't that better!" **
 
President Obama's White House Communications Director, Anita Dunn, on Chairman Mao:  he is one of my two "favorite political philosophers," and "one of the two who I turned to the most...."
 
President Obama's "Manufacturing Czar," Ron Bloom on the free market system and Chairman Mao:  "We get the joke.  We know that the free market is nonsense....  We know this is largely about power....We kind of agree with Mao, that power comes from the barrel of a gun."
 
William Ayers, President Obama's unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist bomber, friend, fellow board member, "respected" national educator, virulently anti-American, and likely ghost writer of the President's autobiography, Dreams of My Father
 
"I am a radical, Leftist, small "c" Communist....  Maybe I am the last Communist willing to admit it....  The ethics of Communism still appeal to me."  
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/10/all_the_presidents_mao.html
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, AURaptor said:

They don't  have to. He does so himself, by his history, his own words, deeds,  and with who he surrounds himself . Willfully ignorant claim he's just some guy, not all that Left of center... 

 

All the President's Mao

President Obama and "the other side of Barack's brain," Valerie Jarrett  --  whose stepfather coincidentally maintained close ties with the President's adolescent mentor and Communist, Frank Marshall Davis  --  handpicked the following bureaucrats and placed them in positions of great authority, power, and visibility: 
 
Van Jones, "Green Jobs Czar," self-defined Communist. 
 
Ron Bloom, "Manufacturing Czar" cites Chairman Mao as a political guide.
 
Anita Dunn, White House Communications Director, who stated in an address to high school students this past June that Chairman Mao Tse-tung was one of the two "philosophers" she most often turns to. 
 
President Obama handpicked and placed the Socialists and socialist sympathizers in positions of great authority and visibility: 
 
Carol Browner, Director, White House Office of Energy and Climate Change Policy, an ardent Socialist activist and one of 14 leaders of Socialist International's, "Commission for a Sustainable World Society," which calls for "global governance."
 
Cass Sunstein, Administrator of the White House Office of Administration and Regulatory Affairs , "who openly argues for bringing socialism to the United States, and even lends support for communism...."
 
How many others, handpicked by Mr. Obama and Ms. Jarrett, are there?  
 
Here is China's Communist Chairman, Mao Tse-tung (whose Maoname, oddly enough means, "to shine on the East") in his own words, at the age of 24, before he became supreme ruler of all China as well as the mass murderer responsible for the death of 70,000,000 people  --  in peacetime:
 
Mao expressed the central elements in his own character, which stayed consistent for the remaining six decades of his life and defined his rule.
 
Mao's attitude to morality consisted of one core, the self, "I," above everything else: 
 
"I do not agree with the view that to be moral, the motive of one's action has to be benefiting others.  Morality does not have to be defined in relation to others... People like me want to ... satisfy our hearts to the full, and in doing so we automatically have the most valuable moral codes.  Of course there are people and objects in the world, but they are all there only for me."* 
 
Mao shunned all constraints of responsibility and duty. 
 
"People like me only have a duty to ourselves; we have no duty to other people." "I am responsible only for the reality that I know," he wrote, "and absolutely not responsible for anything else.  I don't know about the past.  I don't know about the future.  They have nothing to do with the reality of my own self."
 
He explicitly rejected any responsibility  towards future generations.
 
"Some say one has a responsibility for history.  I don't believe it.  I am only concerned about developing myself... I have my desire and act on it I am responsible to no one.
 
....
 
He argued that conscience could go to hell if it was in conflict with his impulses:
 
"These two should be one and the same.  All our actions...are driven by impulse, and the conscience that is wise goes along with this in every instance."
 
....
 
When he came to the question, "How do we change [China]?"  Mao laid the utmost emphasis on destruction: 
 
"...the country must be...destroyed and then re-formed."
 
He extended this line not just to China but to the whole world   --   and event the universe: 
 
"This applies to the country, the nation, and to mankind... The destruction of the universe is the same... People like me long for its destruction, because when the old universe is  destroyed, a new universe will be formed.  Isn't that better!" **
 
President Obama's White House Communications Director, Anita Dunn, on Chairman Mao:  he is one of my two "favorite political philosophers," and "one of the two who I turned to the most...."
 
President Obama's "Manufacturing Czar," Ron Bloom on the free market system and Chairman Mao:  "We get the joke.  We know that the free market is nonsense....  We know this is largely about power....We kind of agree with Mao, that power comes from the barrel of a gun."
 
William Ayers, President Obama's unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist bomber, friend, fellow board member, "respected" national educator, virulently anti-American, and likely ghost writer of the President's autobiography, Dreams of My Father
 
"I am a radical, Leftist, small "c" Communist....  Maybe I am the last Communist willing to admit it....  The ethics of Communism still appeal to me."  
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2009/10/all_the_presidents_mao.html
 

 

More fake news. Your specialty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AURaptor said:

Where's the fake part ?

You recycle the same crap for years. Scrolling up all I had to notice was the lie claiming Ayres wrote his book and then attributing his beliefs to Obama. Obama can write. You may not like what he writes but for years you and other racists have been trying to delegitimize this President with baseless crap like this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  And you are recycling the same crap yourself, asserting  " racists " to anyone who has anything critical to say about Obama. People have looked at his books, is AUTObiographies – both of them – which both came out  before he was even a US senator. Who in the hell does that?  Who writes two books about themselves before they have claimed any semblance of significance on the national stage? By the time they're 40?  And the writing of the books is NOT the relevant point here!!! Ayers, as well as all those listed are EXACTLY as is described !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AURaptor said:

  And you are recycling the same crap yourself, asserting  " racists " to anyone who has anything critical to say about Obama. People have looked at his books, is AUTObiographies – both of them – which both came out  before he was even a US senator. Who in the hell does that?  Who writes two books about themselves before they have claimed any semblance of significance on the national stage? By the time they're 40?  And the writing of the books is NOT the relevant point here!!! Ayers, as well as all those listed are EXACTLY as is described !!

Criticize his actions and policies? Fine. Titan does that and I've never called him racist. I save that term for actual racists. Like you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

Criticize his actions and policies? Fine. Titan does that and I've never called him racist. I save that term for actual racists. Like you.

 Then you are bearing false witness, and you are doing so willingly, knowingly. This is no different than me telling you to go blank yourself. But of course, you won't give yourself a warning, or put yourself in time out, will you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AURaptor said:

 Then you are bearing false witness, and you are doing so willingly, knowingly. This is no different than me telling you to go blank yourself. But of course, you won't give yourself a warning, or put yourself in time out, will you? 

I haven't done that to you. And your actions speak for themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, TexasTiger said:

I haven't done that to you. And your actions speak for themselves.

You have, you know you have ( bore false witness ) , and you refuse to cite even ONE example of this mythical racism. 

 

Because you know you can't. Not with me you can't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, AURaptor said:

You have, you know you have ( bore false witness ) , and you refuse to cite even ONE example of this mythical racism. 

 

Because you know you can't. Not with me you can't. 

Cited one here. You don't think the black man can write well. Has to have a white guy do it for him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...