aupharmd15 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 So, besides Deon Bush and Stefon Diggs, is there anybody else, including current UM commits, that could be swayed our way because of all this stuff going on at the U?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubcali 436 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there will be room. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wareagle165 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 DeAndre Jasper Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rednilla 5,401 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think there will be room. I have a feeling you're right. I just looked up their commitment list, and I haven't heard a peep about the coaches being active in the recruitment of any of them. Just Diggs and Bush, both of whom ARE, to the best of my knowledge, being heavily pursued by Auburn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
3rdgen 2 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 If some kind of death penalty is put in place allowing current players to leave miami highly doubtful but possible due to this involving 72 players. I would take anthony chickillo in a heartbeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mustache eagle 2,416 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 some of these guys my be considered "tainted goods" ... did they get any benefits and would we want to risk it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ellitor 33,114 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 If some kind of death penalty is put in place allowing current players to leave miami highly doubtful but possible due to this involving 72 players. I would take anthony chickillo in a heartbeat. The NCAA has said thousands of times it will never enact another death penalty after it destroyed SMU's program. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU64 10,122 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 This case could test that premise. Makes the OSU and USCw situations look like small potatoes by comparison if the evidence holds up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUCrete 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I completely agree. Whatever they get, it may not be called the "death penalty", but it will be equally crippling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardFightingSoldier 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidbowman 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Seantrell Henderson comes to mind. Poor bloke pulled out of USCw b/c of sanctions, now he's at Miami - prolly wished he had of stayed at USCw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rollsroyce5 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. I don't think there will be 'plenty' of room. With us being at 72 right now and having about 7-9 scholly Sr's, a full class would have us over the 85 limit. Taking any transfers would depend heavily on the amount of attrition that takes happens this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr82b4au 5,568 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Seantrell Henderson comes to mind. Poor bloke pulled out of USCw b/c of sanctions, now he's at Miami - prolly wished he had of stayed at USCw. He is hurt and overweight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LakeBum 187 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Seems like they will all be ineligible to play anyway. Everyone said last year if Cam would have gotten benefits, he couldn't have played, so it makes sense none of these guys will get to play again either. Also, UM will have to vacate all of those wins when ineligible players were playing. I guess their NC will be gone too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HardFightingSoldier 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Seems like they will all be ineligible to play anyway. Everyone said last year if Cam would have gotten benefits, he couldn't have played, so it makes sense none of these guys will get to play again either. Also, UM will have to vacate all of those wins when ineligible players were playing. I guess their NC will be gone too. The violations Shapiro mentioned started in 2002 so they may keep the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
92AUGRAD 4 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 A more important question might be current Miami players that will transfer. There's plenty of room for them. Seems like they will all be ineligible to play anyway. Everyone said last year if Cam would have gotten benefits, he couldn't have played, so it makes sense none of these guys will get to play again either. Also, UM will have to vacate all of those wins when ineligible players were playing. I guess their NC will be gone too. Many of the players today were not involved so they will not be affected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aupelham 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 The 1st person that came to my mind was current commit Ricardo Louis. Seems I read a while back that he grew up a UM fan. And some people thought we'd have to fight off UM until signing day. Don't think that'll be much of a concern anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiger Scout 92 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I don't know if they will get the death penalty but, they have to get alot more than just a few scolly's lost and less time with recruits and other so called slap on the wrist penalties. This is just about as bad as SMU back in the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 U$C should have gotton the "death penalty". Since Miamia has such rich history of breaking NCAA rules, I wouldn't be shocked if they did get some kind of "death penalty". Maybe something like 40 schollys taken away over the next 4 years. No TV and no bowls for 4 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fly757au 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 U$C should have gotton the "death penalty". Since Miamia has such rich history of breaking NCAA rules, I wouldn't be shocked if they did get some kind of "death penalty". Maybe something like 40 schollys taken away over the next 4 years. No TV and no bowls for 4 years. This all started literally a few years after they ended probation imposed in Dec 1995. The NCAA imposed a one year bowl ban and 3 years probation. The first year off probation would have been the 1999 season. This started in 2001-2002. That seems like a pretty rich tradition to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tpain04567 0 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 So two uat coaches (OL coach and director of football op) and UF's WR coach are all named in the article. This could definitely help us with Bush, Diggs, and hopefully a couple of instate guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 I think it will help us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auclong 1 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 U$C should have gotton the "death penalty". Since Miamia has such rich history of breaking NCAA rules, I wouldn't be shocked if they did get some kind of "death penalty". Maybe something like 40 schollys taken away over the next 4 years. No TV and no bowls for 4 years. I don`t think USC was on probation at the time of the Bush fiasco or considered a serial cheater so they wouldn`t qualify for the "death penalty" as such. i personally doubt it will be used again except maybe in the case of extreme continuous cheating and arrogance from the school involved. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuburnGrad97 37 Posted August 17, 2011 Share Posted August 17, 2011 U$C should have gotton the "death penalty". Since Miamia has such rich history of breaking NCAA rules, I wouldn't be shocked if they did get some kind of "death penalty". Maybe something like 40 schollys taken away over the next 4 years. No TV and no bowls for 4 years. I don`t think USC was on probation at the time of the Bush fiasco or considered a serial cheater so they wouldn`t qualify for the "death penalty" as such. i personally doubt it will be used again except maybe in the case of extreme continuous cheating and arrogance from the school involved. So, you're saying it won't be used again until the get to bammer???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
infamousandy 0 Posted August 18, 2011 Share Posted August 18, 2011 The folks at CSS just devoted an hour tonight. A lot of the top guys currently on their roster have said if they have 60 on the roster then they'll play with 60. Mr.SEC said that the current regime would probably hold on to the majority of their committments, which is pretty loaded with 4* guys. It doesn't mean that we can't sway them if we continue to recruit them though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.