NoALtiger 3,873 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 Can't say I'm surprised. http://www.wareagleextra.com/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kickerman97 3 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 Can't say I'm surprised. http://www.wareagleextra.com/ Looks pretty accurate. Decent first year in the SEC for A&M...lol Congrats to them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 But Auburn is loaded...remember? I dont see it and have never seen it out this grouping of personnel. In fact, I honestly do not believe Auburn had a single starter at any position on the field, either side of the ball, that would've started for any other team in the SEC this year. But thats just MO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDUBB4AU 5,138 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 Hahaha..pretty dang motivating though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubearcat 2,138 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 But Auburn is loaded...remember? I dont see it and have never seen it out this grouping of personnel. In fact, I honestly do not believe Auburn had a single starter at any position on the field, either side of the ball, that would've started for any other team in the SEC this year. But thats just MO. Lutz would've been a beast in the A&M offense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 But Auburn is loaded...remember? I dont see it and have never seen it out this grouping of personnel. In fact, I honestly do not believe Auburn had a single starter at any position on the field, either side of the ball, that would've started for any other team in the SEC this year. But thats just MO. Lutz would've been a beast in the A&M offense. He probably would've but I was making reference to the players that actually played most of the season. He played in what? 5 games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sid 0 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 IMO, Tre Mason could have been mentioned! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 IMO, Tre Mason could have been mentioned! Tre mason is a decent back but frankly he's not in the same league as the 2 at Bama or the 2 at UGa. There are probably 6 or 7 more RBs in the SEC that he'd have trouble beating out of a starting position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubearcat 2,138 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 But Auburn is loaded...remember? I dont see it and have never seen it out this grouping of personnel. In fact, I honestly do not believe Auburn had a single starter at any position on the field, either side of the ball, that would've started for any other team in the SEC this year. But thats just MO. Lutz would've been a beast in the A&M offense. He probably would've but I was making reference to the players that actually played most of the season. He played in what? 5 games? True enough but there is also three other years of outstanding play. His catch against Ole Miss last year was one of the best catches I've seen ever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjh304 0 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I was too depressed to post this earlier when I red it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lewisbr 0 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 We had a hard enough time finding starters for our own team. Not surprised Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
icanthearyou 4,464 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 But Auburn is loaded...remember? I dont see it and have never seen it out this grouping of personnel. In fact, I honestly do not believe Auburn had a single starter at any position on the field, either side of the ball, that would've started for any other team in the SEC this year. But thats just MO. I don't know, maybe I'm in denial but I still believe the talent is there. I think way more was going on behind the scenes and our team was damaged goods before the first game. Something happened that killed desire and soured attitudes. I think that problem has been identified and taken care of though. Problem is, it may take a little while to repair the damage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milehighfan 1,240 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 No doubt about it. Whoever gets the HC job will have to give this team a serious attitude adjustment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopsing 585 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I think we have talent, but next coach needs to put these "talents" into successful positions! If AU had gone 6-6 we may have placed a few on there, but being so dismal, well frankly we sucked this year! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Farmer Brown 2,391 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I think we have talent, but next coach needs to put these "talents" into successful positions! If AU had gone 6-6 we may have placed a few on there, but being so dismal, well frankly we sucked this year! We were not good enough to suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hopsing 585 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I think we have talent, but next coach needs to put these "talents" into successful positions! If AU had gone 6-6 we may have placed a few on there, but being so dismal, well frankly we sucked this year! We were not good enough to suck. Thanks. I just choked on key lime pie! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JTFazz 386 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Despite the level of talent, if the team doesn't win, the talented players are often unable to show their stuff or no one notices. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesG 0 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Just to talk about something else.... The all-SEC team was released earlier, and Auburn didnt have a SINGLE player on the first or second team on either side of the ball. Hell, we didn't even have an honorable mention. Has that EVER happened before?? Its just unthinkable considering how we've recruited. Was our coaching staff THAT ineffective?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BZ770 2 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 I can't remember one in recent memory. Stephen Clark in my opinion was the only name that I thought might had a shot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milehighfan 1,240 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 It hasn't happened since 1976 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,819 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 McCalebb for KR 1st Team (stop being greedy Cordelle) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,819 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 Just to talk about something else.... The all-SEC team was released earlier, and Auburn didnt have a SINGLE player on the first or second team on either side of the ball. Hell, we didn't even have an honorable mention. Has that EVER happened before?? Its just unthinkable considering how we've recruited. Was our coaching staff THAT ineffective?? How can you ask any of these questions when they were all answered for you September 1 - November whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoBull367 0 Posted December 4, 2012 Share Posted December 4, 2012 No doubt about it. Whoever gets the HC job will have to give this team a serious attitude adjustment. And I can't wait. We need it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.