Bill Maher Calls Out Rush Limbaugh Boycotters

[WarTim 3,456]

Wow!!!! That's an awful large amount of Rush hate you have there Benny. (It's obvious Libs keep a running "list") To go to that much trouble to share so many half truths is very telling. You might want to address those hate issues with your therapist on next visit. My question still stands. Please, REAL examples...

Says the guy who was making a big deal about no one was providing evidence Rush is a hateful demagogue. :laugh:/>

I swear, sometimes I think you guys forget that all of these exchanges are in writing. :rolleyes:/>

I swear it amazes me when you attempt to think. Obviously doesn't work for you.......

[AURaptor 1,123]

Cite # 1. A audio clip 3:17 minutes long, and the sum total of what he is claimed to have said is -

Limbaugh Calls Poor Children Receiving Free School Meals "Wanton Little Waifs And Serfs Dependent On The State"

IN CONTEXT, he's talking about the ever growing role of govt in feeding kids , from 1 free meal a day in schools, to 3 meals a day in schools, to free meals DURING THE SUMMER ! And what his POINT is that the Left try to paint a view of the children as " wanton waifs and serfs of the State " , to which Rush is OPPOSED !!!

Rush is speaking out AGAINST this very thing, and he's doing so by speaking as if he were one of these Dems, who absurdly portray these kids as if they were real life characters from Les Miserable , or some such.

This is the point ! You ( bleeps ) are completely taking him out of context!!

That's 3 down. Want me to continue ?

[WarTim 3,456]

Cite # 1. A audio clip 3:17 minutes long, and the sum total of what he is claimed to have said is -

Limbaugh Calls Poor Children Receiving Free School Meals "Wanton Little Waifs And Serfs Dependent On The State"

IN CONTEXT, he's talking about the ever growing role of govt in feeding kids , from 1 meal a day in schools, to 3 meals a day in schools, to 3 meals a day DURING THE SUMMER ! And what his POINT is that the Left try to paint a view of the children as " wanton waifs and serfs of the State " , to which Rush is OPPOSED !!!

Rush is speaking out AGAINST this very thing, and he's doing so by speaking as if he were one of these Dems, who absurdly portray these kids as if they were real life characters from Les Miserable , or some such.

This is the point ! You ( bleeps ) are completely taking him out of context!!

That's 3 down. Want me to continue ?

Please continue. I enjoy watching you kill 'em with facts. They have no retort.

[AURaptor 1,123]

Rush went into his " Mr New Castrati " persona, where he speaks as a new age, compassionate Leftist, who whines about how these kids , who can't feed themselves during the school year, will have no possible way of feeding themselves in the summer, as IF they were waifs and serfs. ...

Rush wasn't by any means CALLING poor kids these names, he was speaking out against them being treated as such !

[AUDub 11,148]

Keep going.

[AURaptor 1,123]

He called Sandra Fluke a “slut” and “prostitute” when she advocated for birth control.

He suggested that , if she wanted other people to pay for her birth control, that she was having others pay for her to have sex, ergo.. she was essentially acting like a prostitute. On the matter of having others pay for her birth control, he's right. People should pay for their own b.c., and viagra, for that matter. Neither should be added to HC plans. Those fall under personal responsibility , and should not be treated as an illness.

Did he go too far on his 'joking' ? Sure, I'll admit to that. But his basic point on the ISSUE of forcing a school or company to pay for women's BC is that it's wrong. There's no NEED to have the public pay for this, as there are ways which are inexpensive and readily available for such things to acquired by women , on their own.

[TitanTiger 20,482]

Cite # 1. A audio clip 3:17 minutes long, and the sum total of what he is claimed to have said is -

Limbaugh Calls Poor Children Receiving Free School Meals "Wanton Little Waifs And Serfs Dependent On The State"

IN CONTEXT, he's talking about the ever growing role of govt in feeding kids , from 1 meal a day in schools, to 3 meals a day in schools, to 3 meals a day DURING THE SUMMER ! And what his POINT is that the Left try to paint a view of the children as " wanton waifs and serfs of the State " , to which Rush is OPPOSED !!!

Rush is speaking out AGAINST this very thing, and he's doing so by speaking as if he were one of these Dems, who absurdly portray these kids as if they were real life characters from Les Miserable , or some such.

This is the point ! You ( bleeps ) are completely taking him out of context!!

That's 3 down. Want me to continue ?

Please continue. I enjoy watching you kill 'em with facts. They have no retort.

Of course. That's the whole point of proving the assertion that "none of them are true."

[AURaptor 1,123]

LIMBAUGH: There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia... I want to take you back. I want you to remember the first time, wherever you were, that you heard about gay marriage, and I want you to try to recall your reaction -- your first gut reaction -- when you heard that some activists or somebody was trying to promote the notion of gay marriage. What was your initial reaction? "Aw, come on. It'll never happen. That's silly. What are you talking about?" There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage. What has happened to gay marriage? It's become normal -- and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it's the most important issue in terms of who they vote for. So don't pooh-pooh. There's a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don't pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don't let go.

[...]

Now, there were people -- I just want to remind you -- back during the early days of the effort to redefine what a family is, and in the early days of the gay marriage activists, there were people who said, "Well, if this becomes mainstream, then someday marrying your dog is gonna be okay, and then having two husbands and two wives in one family is gonna be okay, 'cause who can say it isn't?" There were others who predicted that pedophilia would be mainstream, and there was an outcry of opposition to this.

And he was proven, once again, to be right. At least, things are certainly moving that way.

" then someday marrying your dog is gonna be ok.

( or cats )

Barbarella Buchner Is Happily Married To Her Two Cats, Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary

http://www.inquisitr...RgBVQW9UCSLf.99

But Rush's point is, just as many blacks objected to gay marriage as being the new 'civil rights ' struggle, it won't be too long ( 5, 10, 20 years ? ) before the age of consent for marrying starts to be targeted by certain groups.

New Jersey already allows incest marriages, of consenting adults ie Father / Daughter.

Normalizing Pedophilia

[AURaptor 1,123]

He denies guns play any role in domestic violence fatalities.

No, he doesn't. In a 2:45 segment about how Hollywood glorifies gun deaths ( he was speaking of the final ep of Boardwalk Empire ) they in turn are the ones who want to take away our guns. Discussion then turns to the murder / suicide of NFL player Jovan Belcher. and he challenges the idea that they'd still be alive if he didn't have a gun. He was talking about the idea that if we banned guns, violence would simply evaporate. No where in that clip does he state that runs play NO rule in domestic violence.

[AUDub 11,148]

He called Sandra Fluke a “slut” and “prostitute” when she advocated for birth control.

He suggested that , if she wanted other people to pay for her birth control, that she was having others pay for her to have sex, ergo.. she was essentially acting like a prostitute. On the matter of having others pay for her birth control, he's right. People should pay for their own b.c., and viagra, for that matter. Neither should be added to HC plans. Those fall under personal responsibility , and should not be treated as an illness.

Did he go too far on his 'joking' ? Sure, I'll admit to that. But his basic point on the ISSUE of forcing a school or company to pay for women's BC is that it's wrong. There's no NEED to have the public pay for this, as there are ways which are inexpensive and readily available for such things to acquired by women , on their own.

Stop right here. This rationalization is bunk.

"Can you imagine, if you were her parents, how proud…you would be? Your daughter…testifies she’s having so much sex she can’t afford her own birth control pills and she wants President Obama to provide them, or the pope..."

"Women are having so much sex they can't afford their birth control"

He continued in that vein for three freakin days.

The best you got is that he was joking? Puh-leeze!

[AURaptor 1,123]

Ben - well, he was joking about the prostitute stuff, but the bigger , more important point was, forcing BC to be paid for by a company or university, as mandated by Obama ( government ) is wrong.

And nothing I said was ' bunk '.

How long he talked about it doesn't in the least bit change what I said.

Your bemusement aside, Rush did take great offense to the main issue of yet MORE govt intrusion into the lives of every day Americans.

A concept which clearly is beyond you to grasp.

[AUDub 11,148]

Ben - well, he was joking about the prostitute stuff, but the bigger , more important point was, forcing BC to be paid for by a company or university, as mandated by Obama ( government ) is wrong.

And nothing I said was ' bunk '.

How long he talked about it doesn't in the least bit change what I said.

Your bemusement aside, Rush did take great offense to the main issue of yet MORE govt intrusion into the lives of every day Americans.

A concept which clearly is beyond you to grasp.

Wednesday :

1) Can you imagine, if you’re her parents, how proud of Sandra Fluke you would be? Your daughter goes up to a congressional hearing conducted by the Botox-filled Nancy Pelosi and testifies she’s having so much sex she can’t afford her own birth control pills and she agrees that Obama should provide them, or the Pope.

2) Sandra Fluke, one of the Butt Sisters, is being dragged out of law school by the hair. Wait ’til Rick Santorum hears about this. Wait ’til Gingrich hears about this! What do you think they’ll do? They’ll put a stop to this right away! They’ll head over that university and they’ll stop it!

They’ll spy on Sandra Fluke and interrupt her in mid-coitus, and then they’ll make ’em get married.

3) What does it say about the college co-ed Susan Fluke [sic], who goes before a congressional committee and says that she must be paid to have sex. What does that make her? It makes her a slut, right? It makes her a prostitute. She wants to be paid to have sex. She’s having so much sex she can’t afford the contraception.

4) Okay, so she’s not a slut. She’s “round heeled.” I take it back.

Thursday :

5) The reaction that they are having to what I said yesterday about Susan Fluke — or Sandra Fluke, whatever her name is — the Georgetown student who went before a congressional committee and said she’s having so much sex, she’s going broke buying contraceptives and wants us to buy them.

6) I said, what would you call someone who wants us to pay for her to have sex — what would you call that woman? You’d call them a slut, a prostitute.

7) The headline: “Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie Mandate — A Georgetown co-ed told Rep. Nancy Pelosi’s hearing that the women in her law school program are having so much sex that they’re going broke, so you and I should pay for their birth control.” Cybercast News Service. So what would you call that? So I called it what it is.

8) Why go before a congressional committee and demand that all of us — because they want to have sex any time, as many times and as often as they want, with as many partners as they want — should pay for it? Whatever, no limits on this. I mean, they’re going broke having to buy contraception!

9) Sandra Fluke reported to Pelosi: “It costs a female student $3,000 to have protected sex over the course of her three-year stint in law school, according to her calculations. ‘Without insurance coverage, contraception, as you know, can cost a woman over $3,000 during law school,’ Fluke told the hearing. . . . That’s a thousand dollars a year of sex — and, she wants us to pay for it.” Now, what does that make her? She wants us to buy her sex. She wants us to pay for her sex, and she went to a congressional committee to close the sale.

10) At $1 a condom, if she shops at CVS pharmacy’s Web site, that $3,000 would buy her 3,000 condoms, or a thousand of them a year. We’ve done all kinds of research on this. And what about these deadbeat boyfriends or random hookups that these babes are encountering here, having sex with nearly three times a day? While in law school.

11) Okay, so this is a law student at a congressional committee asking for us to pay for the things that make it possible for her to have sex.

Therefore we are paying her to have sex.

Therefore we are paying her for having sex.

We are getting screwed even though we don’t meet her personally!

12) Ms. Fluke, have you ever heard of not having sex?

13) So, if we’re gonna sit here, and if we’re gonna have a part in this, then we want something in return, Ms. Fluke: And that would be the videos of all this sex posted online so we can see what we are getting for our money.

14) Ms. Fluke, who bought your condoms in junior high?

15) Stop the tape. Courageous. Recue that to the top. Courageous, having so much sex she’s going broke at Georgetown Law. (laughing) Gosh, I love this.

16) Folks, for all the hilarity that’s contained in what’s going on here . . . here’s a woman exercising no self-control. The fact that she wants to have repeated, never-ending, as often as she wants it sex — given.

17) Did you notice in that sound bite Sheila Jackson Lee or Maria Cantwell or one of them talked about the strength that Sandra Fluke had to go before Congress, which is amazing. She’s having so much sex it’s amazing she can still walk, but she made it up there.

18) Do you realize at the end of the day what’s happening here? The Democrats are putting on parade a woman who is happily presenting herself as an immoral, baseless, no-purpose-to-her-life woman. She wants all the sex in the world, whenever she wants it, all the time. No consequences. No responsibility for her behavior.

Friday :

19) Obama just called Sandra Fluke to make sure she was all right? Awwww. (kissing sound) That is so compassionate! What a great guy. The president called her to make sure she’s okay. What is she, 30 years old? Thirty years old, a student at Georgetown Law, who admits to having so much sex that she can’t afford it anymore.

20) Okay. Let me ask you a question. I might be surprised at the answer I would get to this question. Your daughter appears before a congressional committee and says she’s having so much sex, she can’t pay for it and wants a new welfare program to pay for it. Would you be proud? I don’t know about you, but I’d be embarrassed. I’d disconnect the phone. I’d go into hiding and hope the media didn’t find me. See, everybody forgets what starts this, or what started this whole thing. Or maybe they don’t! Maybe that’s normal behavior on the left now, for all I know.

21) So Pelosi arranges her own press conference for the woman, and the woman makes it clear (her name is Sandra Fluke) that she’s having so much sex, she can’t pay for it — and we should. She’s having so much sex, she can’t afford it.

For three days, he attacked her character viciously and made an absolute fool of himself in the process.

And you have the gall to suggest that it isn't hateful. That he was kidding.

You are absolutely hilarious.

Get on with it. I want to hear how you rationalize what he said about Michael J. Fox. Also, the black caller he told to "get the bone out of her nose."

Go on. I'm absolutely riveted.

[WarTim 3,456]

It is no "fluke" that she appears very "slutty"...

[AURaptor 1,123]

He was vindicated on the MJ Fox issue, and Fox even admitted to not taking his medication at times to amplify the effects of his disease.

And as of yet, all the fuss over Embryonic Stem Cells ? Turned out to be just bunk. They're hardly the answer anyone thought they'd be. All the noise for nothing.

[AUDub 11,148]

He was vindicated on the MJ Fox issue, and Fox even admitted to not taking his medication at times to amplify the effects of his disease.

And as of yet, all the fuss over Embryonic Stem Cells ? Turned out to be just bunk. They're hardly the answer anyone thought they'd be. All the noise for nothing.

Link?

NM found on wiki where he skipped before a senate hearing.

That's a far cry from faking the symptoms of his illness.

[AURaptor 1,123]

He told a black female to take the bone out of her nose and call him back

Back in the early 70's, early in his broadcast career, under a pseudonym, Jeff Christie.

So, technically, RUSH never said that, in the 25 years of his current radio show. It was 40 years ago, when times were different and so was his show.

Rush Limbaugh acknowledged making these statements in a 1990 Newsday article (although the latter, at least, occurred not on Limbaugh's now-familiar talk and political commentary radio program, but at the beginning of his broadcast career back in the early 1970s when he was hosting a Top 40 music show under the name "Jeff Christie" on either WIXZ or KQV in Pittsburgh):

• "Take that bone out of your nose and call me back."
  

For all his bravado, however, Limbaugh is immensely sensitive to charges of insensitivity. When asked about the racist they-all-look-alike connotation of a statement like "Have you ever noticed how all newspaper composite pictures of wanted criminals resemble Jesse Jackson?" this professional talker from a family of lawyers pleads total innocence.

"You may interpret it as that, but I, no, honest-to-God, that's not how I intended it at all. Gee, don't get me in this one. I am the least racist host you'll ever find." Recalling a stint as an "insult-radio" DJ in Pittsburgh, he admits feeling guilty about, for example, telling a black listener he could not understand to "take that bone out of your nose and call me back."

Read more at http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/limbaugh.asp#otdYHY1Fkqp2VgXK.99

[AUDub 11,148]

...So, technically, RUSH never said that, in the 25 years of his current radio show. It was 40 years ago, when times were different and so was his show....

Now THAT is some silly sophistry.

[WarTim 3,456]

...So, technically, RUSH never said that, in the 25 years of his current radio show. It was 40 years ago, when times were different and so was his show....

Now THAT is some silly sophistry.

"Silly"? Really? What type person even uses that word?....Ohhh.....Never mind... : - )

[AUDub 11,148]

Michael J. Fox lets us know what he thought:

Well, he was just being a bully. When you think about it...if he had been smart about it or entertaining about it, I would have laughed...if there had been some sense of humor about it. The worse part of it was, come after me all you want, but don’t get on camera and shake. That’s someone’s mother you’re making fun of, that’s not me. I just think he’s a bully and I ignore him.

Classy guy.

[AUDub 11,148]

It is no "fluke" that she appears very "slutty"...

I like how my reaction to this got chopped.

[AUDub 11,148]

...So, technically, RUSH never said that, in the 25 years of his current radio show. It was 40 years ago, when times were different and so was his show....

Now THAT is some silly sophistry.

"Silly"? Really? What type person even uses that word?....Ohhh.....Never mind... : - )

His name is WarTim.

Silly rabbits. barry is just the gift that keeps on giving. Destroying the dems more and more each day!!!!!!!

[DKW 86 7,423]

LIMBAUGH: There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia... I want to take you back. I want you to remember the first time, wherever you were, that you heard about gay marriage, and I want you to try to recall your reaction -- your first gut reaction -- when you heard that some activists or somebody was trying to promote the notion of gay marriage. What was your initial reaction? "Aw, come on. It'll never happen. That's silly. What are you talking about?" There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage. What has happened to gay marriage? It's become normal -- and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it's the most important issue in terms of who they vote for. So don't pooh-pooh. There's a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don't pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don't let go.

[...]

Now, there were people -- I just want to remind you -- back during the early days of the effort to redefine what a family is, and in the early days of the gay marriage activists, there were people who said, "Well, if this becomes mainstream, then someday marrying your dog is gonna be okay, and then having two husbands and two wives in one family is gonna be okay, 'cause who can say it isn't?" There were others who predicted that pedophilia would be mainstream, and there was an outcry of opposition to this.

And he was proven, once again, to be right. At least, things are certainly moving that way.

" then someday marrying your dog is gonna be ok.

( or cats )

Barbarella Buchner Is Happily Married To Her Two Cats, Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary

http://www.inquisitr...RgBVQW9UCSLf.99

But Rush's point is, just as many blacks objected to gay marriage as being the new 'civil rights ' struggle, it won't be too long ( 5, 10, 20 years ? ) before the age of consent for marrying starts to be targeted by certain groups.

New Jersey already allows incest marriages, of consenting adults ie Father / Daughter.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Wait, there really is a Barbarella?????

[AUDub 11,148]

LIMBAUGH: There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia... I want to take you back. I want you to remember the first time, wherever you were, that you heard about gay marriage, and I want you to try to recall your reaction -- your first gut reaction -- when you heard that some activists or somebody was trying to promote the notion of gay marriage. What was your initial reaction? "Aw, come on. It'll never happen. That's silly. What are you talking about?" There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage. What has happened to gay marriage? It's become normal -- and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it's the most important issue in terms of who they vote for. So don't pooh-pooh. There's a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don't pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don't let go.

[...]

Now, there were people -- I just want to remind you -- back during the early days of the effort to redefine what a family is, and in the early days of the gay marriage activists, there were people who said, "Well, if this becomes mainstream, then someday marrying your dog is gonna be okay, and then having two husbands and two wives in one family is gonna be okay, 'cause who can say it isn't?" There were others who predicted that pedophilia would be mainstream, and there was an outcry of opposition to this.

And he was proven, once again, to be right. At least, things are certainly moving that way.

" then someday marrying your dog is gonna be ok.

( or cats )

Barbarella Buchner Is Happily Married To Her Two Cats, Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary

http://www.inquisitr...RgBVQW9UCSLf.99

But Rush's point is, just as many blacks objected to gay marriage as being the new 'civil rights ' struggle, it won't be too long ( 5, 10, 20 years ? ) before the age of consent for marrying starts to be targeted by certain groups.

New Jersey already allows incest marriages, of consenting adults ie Father / Daughter.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Wait, there really is a Barbarella?????

All I know is that her marriage cert does not look official. Marryyourpet.com?

[DKW 86 7,423]

LIMBAUGH: There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia... I want to take you back. I want you to remember the first time, wherever you were, that you heard about gay marriage, and I want you to try to recall your reaction -- your first gut reaction -- when you heard that some activists or somebody was trying to promote the notion of gay marriage. What was your initial reaction? "Aw, come on. It'll never happen. That's silly. What are you talking about?" There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage. What has happened to gay marriage? It's become normal -- and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it's the most important issue in terms of who they vote for. So don't pooh-pooh. There's a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don't pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don't let go.

[...]

Now, there were people -- I just want to remind you -- back during the early days of the effort to redefine what a family is, and in the early days of the gay marriage activists, there were people who said, "Well, if this becomes mainstream, then someday marrying your dog is gonna be okay, and then having two husbands and two wives in one family is gonna be okay, 'cause who can say it isn't?" There were others who predicted that pedophilia would be mainstream, and there was an outcry of opposition to this.

And he was proven, once again, to be right. At least, things are certainly moving that way.

" then someday marrying your dog is gonna be ok.

( or cats )

Barbarella Buchner Is Happily Married To Her Two Cats, Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary

http://www.inquisitr...RgBVQW9UCSLf.99

But Rush's point is, just as many blacks objected to gay marriage as being the new 'civil rights ' struggle, it won't be too long ( 5, 10, 20 years ? ) before the age of consent for marrying starts to be targeted by certain groups.

New Jersey already allows incest marriages, of consenting adults ie Father / Daughter.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Wait, there really is a Barbarella?????

All I know is that her marriage cert does not look official. Marryyourpet.com?

So you are saying she may have lied about her name on the make believe marriage license from the BS website?

How RUDE!

[AUDub 11,148]

LIMBAUGH: There is an effort underway to normalize pedophilia... I want to take you back. I want you to remember the first time, wherever you were, that you heard about gay marriage, and I want you to try to recall your reaction -- your first gut reaction -- when you heard that some activists or somebody was trying to promote the notion of gay marriage. What was your initial reaction? "Aw, come on. It'll never happen. That's silly. What are you talking about?" There is a movement on to normalize pedophilia, and I guarantee you your reaction to that is probably much the same as your reaction when you first heard about gay marriage. What has happened to gay marriage? It's become normal -- and in fact, with certain people in certain demographics it's the most important issue in terms of who they vote for. So don't pooh-pooh. There's a movement to normalize pedophilia. Don't pooh-pooh it. The people behind it are serious, and you know the left as well as I do. They glom onto something and they don't let go.

[...]

Now, there were people -- I just want to remind you -- back during the early days of the effort to redefine what a family is, and in the early days of the gay marriage activists, there were people who said, "Well, if this becomes mainstream, then someday marrying your dog is gonna be okay, and then having two husbands and two wives in one family is gonna be okay, 'cause who can say it isn't?" There were others who predicted that pedophilia would be mainstream, and there was an outcry of opposition to this.

And he was proven, once again, to be right. At least, things are certainly moving that way.

" then someday marrying your dog is gonna be ok.

( or cats )

Barbarella Buchner Is Happily Married To Her Two Cats, Celebrates 10-Year Anniversary

http://www.inquisitr...RgBVQW9UCSLf.99

But Rush's point is, just as many blacks objected to gay marriage as being the new 'civil rights ' struggle, it won't be too long ( 5, 10, 20 years ? ) before the age of consent for marrying starts to be targeted by certain groups.

New Jersey already allows incest marriages, of consenting adults ie Father / Daughter.

Normalizing Pedophilia

Wait, there really is a Barbarella?????

All I know is that her marriage cert does not look official. Marryyourpet.com?

So you are saying she may have lied about her name on the make believe marriage license from the BS website?

How RUDE!

Guilty as charged.