Whoops! Likely future speaker McCarthy slips up and states the truth.

[icanthearyou 4,462]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Oh BS! The case against Hillary is a "slam dunk", just like the WMDs. Wait a minute, Raptor has argued both sides of that one.

Bad intel? No, good intel? Suddenly, I am confused.

Allow me to check with Raptor and get back to you.

[homersapien 11,367]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Oh BS! The case against Hillary is a "slam dunk", just like the WMDs. Wait a minute, Raptor has argued both sides of that one.

Bad intel? No, good intel? Suddenly, I am confused.

Allow me to check with Raptor and get back to you.

Yeah, that's what the 1st investigation showed. Or, maybe it was the 2nd. 3rd? 4th? Dang, how many investigations have there been? I forget.

[autigeremt 6,601]

Hillary is guilty.

Moving on.......

[icanthearyou 4,462]

Hillary is guilty.

Moving on.......

I also believe she is guilty of something. However, I think we should be specific as to what she is guilty of. And, I think we should be honest in regard to the original claims of guilt having been, to date, proven false.

[AURaptor 1,122]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Hillary is more guilty. 1 dead Ambassador and 3 other Americans.

THERE'S the difference.

[icanthearyou 4,462]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Hillary is more guilty. 1 dead Ambassador and 3 other Americans.

THERE'S the difference.

She caused their deaths? Really? You have proof? You should contact Trey Gowdy immediately.

Finally, we can wrap this up. Who knew Raptor holding this critical information.

Why didn't you say so?

[homersapien 11,367]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Hillary is more guilty. 1 dead Ambassador and 3 other Americans.

THERE'S the difference.

Well if the body count determines guilt then Reagan was 60 times more guilty than Hillary. :-\

[AURaptor 1,122]

All McCarthy said was the truth. YOU seem to think that the truth means the investigation was just to hurt Hillary, when it was on going LONG before she announced she was running. In reality, the TRUTH is that she's a lying sack of s*** and because she's been uncooperative on the whole issue, it's hurt her poll numbers, because we've discovered more and more about what she's claimed to be flat out LIES.

The reasons for the hearings into this administration's cover up of Benghazi isn't political, but the implications of the cover up being found out DOES have political fall out.

This would be like Woodward and Bernstein being accused of phonying up the Watergate investigation, JUST because they wanted to bring Nixon down.

Nixon was guilty, so he left office, ipso facto, IT WAS POLITICAL !

There's the difference.

Hillary is more guilty. 1 dead Ambassador and 3 other Americans.

THERE'S the difference.

Well if the body count determines guilt then Reagan was 60 times more guilty than Hillary. :-\

No, guilt determines guilty, genius. Hillary has already lied, already put top secret e-mails on a shoddy private server which was most likely hacked, while conversing w/ non govt operatives and close personal allies on matters concerning national security.

[cooltigger21 0]

Nobody got killed in Watergate. Because Hillary and Obama sat on their ass and ignored warnings and pleas for more security, several American citizens, including the ambassador, lost their lives. When the attack came, no action was taken to repel it and requests by others to be allowed to help were denied. Obama was nowhere to be found while this was happening. The events afterward make the Watergate coverup look like amateur hour.

[icanthearyou 4,462]

Nobody got killed in Watergate. Because Hillary and Obama sat on their ass and ignored warnings and pleas for more security, several American citizens, including the ambassador, lost their lives. When the attack came, no action was taken to repel it and requests by others to be allowed to help were denied. Obama was nowhere to be found while this was happening. The events afterward make the Watergate coverup look like amateur hour.

Who said anything about Watergate? If you wish to introduce Richard Nixon, perhaps his alleged undermining of the Paris peace negotiations prior to the election of 1968 would be a better comparison? How many people (Americans, Vietnamese, Cambodians, Laotians) died as a result?

"When the attack came, no action was taken to repel it and requests by others to be allowed to help were denied. Obama was nowhere to be found while this was happening. The events afterward make the Watergate coverup look like amateur hour."

Do you realize that this narrative contradicts the findings of at least a half dozen investigations? IMO, the only thing sinister about the handling of Benghazi was the attempt to frame the cause of the attack as something other than terrorism based upon the potential impact on the upcoming election.