AdamsHouseCat 43 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 Would it have counted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grumps 3,705 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 I don't think so. It is impossible to catch the ball then shoot it in 0.01 sec. A tip-in is the only possible way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,083 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 Looked close but Grumps is right. I think there is even a number below which it has to be a tip. 1.4 maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,928 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 With 0.3 or less the only way to score is with a tap. By rule you cannot gain control of the ball and take a shot. From the rule book: In any period, when the game clock displays 10ths of seconds and play is to be resumed by a throw-in or a free throw when 3/10 (.3) of a second or less remains on the game clock, a player may not gain control of the ball and attempt a try for a field goal. Such player can only score a field goal by means of a tap of a pass or of a missed free throw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeleagle 2,945 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 26 minutes ago, jj3jordan said: Looked close but Grumps is right. I think there is even a number below which it has to be a tip. 1.4 maybe? No i think it can be less than that. I think the only way a shot with .1 sec counts is if it is only a tip in. I was at the game and the LSU player did not get it off in the .1 sec and he had no shot to tip it in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeleagle 2,945 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 7 minutes ago, WarTiger said: With 0.3 or less the only way to score is with a tap. By rule you cannot gain control of the ball and take a shot. From the rule book: In any period, when the game clock displays 10ths of seconds and play is to be resumed by a throw-in or a free throw when 3/10 (.3) of a second or less remains on the game clock, a player may not gain control of the ball and attempt a try for a field goal. Such player can only score a field goal by means of a tap of a pass or of a missed free throw. Are you sure that is only a high school rule? I have seen a tip in with .1 seconds left. I was at the game, and it looked like if there had been .3 left, that LSU player' shot (not tip in), if it had gone in would have counted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jj3jordan 2,083 Posted February 8, 2020 Share Posted February 8, 2020 5 minutes ago, steeleagle said: No i think it can be less than that. I think the only way a shot with .1 sec counts is if it is only a tip in. I was at the game and the LSU player did not get it off in the .1 sec and he had no shot to tip it in. May be a couple of tenths less. Not sure of the real number but he did get the shot off quick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerman1186 537 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 Not to question the .01 seconds, but I'd wish we would have put someone in front to the guy bring it in...at least force him to change the projectory of the throw in...PLUS the game was at AUBURN, the horn should have gone off as soon as it touched his hand, to make it a 'no doubt' situation... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDUBB4AU 5,138 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 Could AU beat Bama in .01?? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,819 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 Im pretty sure Derek Fisher is one of the few guys to get a shot off with 4 seconds off, which is the lowest you can get a shot off lol. With the way LSU fought, I feel like they wouldve been next on that list if they had the time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,928 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 21 hours ago, steeleagle said: Are you sure that is only a high school rule? I have seen a tip in with .1 seconds left. I was at the game, and it looked like if there had been .3 left, that LSU player' shot (not tip in), if it had gone in would have counted. by rule it HAS to be a tip in. It cannot be catch and shoot. That rule is taken right from the college rule book and this rule has been in place for quite a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr82be 14,508 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 0.1 seconds. In the context of the official "One Mississippi" way of keeping time (is there a better way), that's catching and getting a shot off faster than you can say "Miss". Nope, would obviously have to be a tip in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Viper 3,139 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 23 hours ago, AdamsHouseCat said: Would it have counted? Not a chance... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steeleagle 2,945 Posted February 9, 2020 Share Posted February 9, 2020 6 hours ago, WarTiger said: That rule is taken right from the college rule book and this rule has been in place for quite a while. I think you are right now. I watched the replay and the SEC analyst said it has to be a tip in with .3/sec or less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penguin149 391 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 So why not say time expired as JVon's shot went thru the net? It's next to impossible to determine when the shot was "complete" within one-tenth of a second. If no meaningful play can take place, just call it done! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamsHouseCat 43 Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 I remember thinking what could possibly go wrong here, and my answer was a foul. Glad our guys knew not to get near an LSU player. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdamsHouseCat 43 Posted February 10, 2020 Author Share Posted February 10, 2020 Was the .001 correct or should time have expired? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LKEEL75 2,566 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 27 minutes ago, AdamsHouseCat said: Was the .001 correct or should time have expired? I'm pretty sure it was 0.1 seconds. Seems minute but there is a difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSammyK 171 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 WarTiger, let me ask you this, how is the rule for giving a technical when a team is out of timeouts but a player attempts to call one handled? Is it supposed to be automatic or is it a judgment call? After J’Von hit his floater Watford grabbed the ball and immediately tried to call a timeout. He did it multiple times right in front of the ref. I was shouting at my tv and am wondering if I was the only one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAReeves2010 627 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 1 hour ago, BigSammyK said: WarTiger, let me ask you this, how is the rule for giving a technical when a team is out of timeouts but a player attempts to call one handled? Is it supposed to be automatic or is it a judgment call? After J’Von hit his floater Watford grabbed the ball and immediately tried to call a timeout. He did it multiple times right in front of the ref. I was shouting at my tv and am wondering if I was the only one. LSU still had both of their timeouts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,138 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 4 hours ago, penguin149 said: So why not say time expired as JVon's shot went thru the net? It's next to impossible to determine when the shot was "complete" within one-tenth of a second. If no meaningful play can take place, just call it done! Seems wrong somehow. There is time on the clock. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,819 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 4 hours ago, penguin149 said: So why not say time expired as JVon's shot went thru the net? It's next to impossible to determine when the shot was "complete" within one-tenth of a second. If no meaningful play can take place, just call it done! A foul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSammyK 171 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 8 hours ago, CAReeves2010 said: LSU still had both of their timeouts. No they didn’t. They used their last timeout when they took the 90-89 lead. https://www.ncaa.com/video/basketball-men/2020-02-08/di-mbk-highlights-lsu-auburn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAReeves2010 627 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 3 hours ago, BigSammyK said: No they didn’t. They used their last timeout when they took the 90-89 lead. https://www.ncaa.com/video/basketball-men/2020-02-08/di-mbk-highlights-lsu-auburn You're right. Should've been a technical but they blew the whistle right after the shot to view the replay Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigSammyK 171 Posted February 10, 2020 Share Posted February 10, 2020 39 minutes ago, CAReeves2010 said: You're right. Should've been a technical but they blew the whistle right after the shot to view the replay The more I watch the replay, I think the initial whistle was because Watford was calling a timeout. The ref looks right at him and blows the whistle to stop play. https://youtu.be/47EryuapkMM?t=1922 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.