N. Korea negotiating.

[CCTAU 3,346]

N. Korea agrees to nuclear disarmament By BURT HERMAN, Associated Press Writer

15 minutes ago

BEIJING - North Korea agreed Tuesday after arduous talks to shut down its main nuclear reactor and eventually dismantle its atomic weapons program, just four months after the communist state shocked the world by testing a nuclear bomb.

ADVERTISEMENT

The deal marks the first concrete plan for disarmament in more than three years of six-nation negotiations, and could potentially herald a new era of cooperation in the region with the North's longtime foes — the United States and Japan — also agreeing to discuss normalizing relations with Pyongyang.

Under the deal, the North will receive initial aid equal to 50,000 tons heavy fuel oil within 60 days for shutting down and sealing its main nuclear reactor and related facilities at Yongbyon, north of the capital, to be confirmed by international inspectors.

For irreversibly disabling the reactor and declaring all nuclear programs, the North will eventually receive another 950,000 tons in aid.

The agreement was read to all delegates in a conference room at a Chinese state guesthouse and Chinese envoy Wu Dawei asked if there were any objections. When none were made, the officials all stood and applauded.

The main U.S. nuclear envoy said Washington was satisfied with an agreement on initial steps for North Korea to disarm but called it just the start of the process.

"Obviously we have a long way to go, but we're very pleased with this agreement," Assistant Secretary of State Christopher Hill told reporters. "It's a very solid step forward."

North Korea and United States also will embark on talks aimed at resolving disputes and restarting diplomatic relations, Wu said. The Korean peninsula has technically remained in a state of war for more than a half-century since the Korean War ended in a 1953 cease-fire.

The United States will begin the process of removing North Korea from its designation as a terror-sponsoring state and also on ending U.S. trade sanctions, but no deadlines was set, according to the agreement.

Hill said that Washington also had pledged to resolve financial restrictions against a bank where North Korea held accounts within a month.

Washington's blacklisting of a Macau bank in September 2005 had been an obstacle to nuclear talks, leading the North to a more-than-yearlong boycott during which it tested its first nuclear bomb.

Japan and North Korea also will seek to normalize relations. But Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said in Tokyo that his country would not yet join in giving aid to the North. Japan has said it wants to resolve the issue of abductions of its citizens that Pyongyang has admitted to but not addressed to Tokyo's satisfaction.

If Pyongyang follows through with its promises, they would be the first moves the communist nation has made to scale back its atomic development after more than three years of six-nation negotiations marked by delays, deadlock and the North's first nuclear test explosion in October.

Making sure that Pyongyang declares all its nuclear facilities and shuts them down is likely to prove arduous, nuclear experts have said.

North Korea has sidestepped previous agreements, allegedly running a uranium-based weapons program even as it froze a plutonium-based one — sparking the latest nuclear crisis in late 2002. The country is believed to have countless mountainside tunnels in which to hide projects.

Already before its adoption, the deal drew strong criticism from John Bolton, former U.S. ambassador to the U.N., who urged President Bush to reject it.

"I am very disturbed by this deal," Bolton told CNN. "It sends exactly the wrong signal to would-be proliferators around the world: 'If we hold out long enough, wear down the State Department negotiators, eventually you get rewarded,' in this case with massive shipments of heavy fuel oil for doing only partially what needs to be done."

The deal requires the North to state all its nuclear programs — including plutonium it has already extracted from the Yongbyon reactor, the agreement says.

After the initial 60 days, a joint meeting will be convened of foreign ministers from all countries at the talks — China, Japan, Russia, the United States and the two Koreas.

Under the agreement, five working groups are to meet within 30 days: denuclearization, normalization of U.S.-North Korea relations, normalization of North Korea-Japan relations, economy and energy cooperation, and peace and security in northeast Asia.

Another meeting of the nuclear envoys was scheduled March 19 to check on the groups' progress.

Hill said the North Koreans had insisted that the specific amount of aid they were to receive in the agreement was spelled out during the six-nation negotiations — and not left to a later working group to address — as the U.S. had wanted.

In return, Hill said the negotiators moved to also discuss the next step in disarmament, the actual disabling of the North's programs so they could not easily be restarted.

"We took what was essentially a sticking point and used it as a way to make further progress on the road to denuclearization," he said.

In September 2005, North Korea was promised energy aid and security guarantees in exchange for pledging to abandon its nuclear programs. But talks on implementing that agreement repeatedly stalled on other issues

[AURaptor 1,126]

Here's to all those geo-political geniuses who said Bush was being a stubborn cowboy for forcing N.Korea into 6 nation negotiations.

Kiss this ! ---->

[otterinbham 0]

Here's to all those geo-political geniuses who said Bush was being a stubborn cowboy for forcing N.Korea into 6 nation negotiations.

Kiss this ! ---->

What? John Bolton is right. This is a sellout deal. It's not much better than the deal Clinton cut in the 90s.

[LegalEagle 22]

Here's to all those geo-political geniuses who said Bush was being a stubborn cowboy for forcing N.Korea into 6 nation negotiations.

Kiss this ! ---->

Where do you find we were responsible for this? It appears to me the Chinese put the squeeze on them. If it was us, then why is this better than the Clinton deal you poo-pah so often?

[AURaptor 1,126]

Where do you find we were responsible for this? It appears to me the Chinese put the squeeze on them. If it was us, then why is this better than the Clinton deal you poo-pah so often?

You're kidding, right ? Read the gorram article! This is WHY 6 nation talks are so benefitial . Had Bush given in to just 2 party talks, assistance from China could not have been as forthcoming, or coming at all.

North Korea and United States also will embark on talks aimed at resolving disputes and restarting diplomatic relations, Wu said. The Korean peninsula has technically remained in a state of war for more than a half-century since the Korean War ended in a 1953 cease-fire.

The United States will begin the process of removing North Korea from its designation as a terror-sponsoring state and also on ending U.S. trade sanctions, but no deadlines was set, according to the agreement.

And also this.... Japan and North Korea also will seek to normalize relations.

Sure, it might be a 'sell out', as Bolton says, but at least we're not giving them nuclear technology, like the Clintons did. Also, the NKs are on record for accepting this offer, brokered , it seems , with China. If the NKs back out of this, then they'll have pissed off the Chinese and shown the world that they, and not the USA , were dealing in bad faith.

[TexasTiger 13,026]

Here's to all those geo-political geniuses who said Bush was being a stubborn cowboy for forcing N.Korea into 6 nation negotiations.

Kiss this ! ---->

What? John Bolton is right. This is a sellout deal. It's not much better than the deal Clinton cut in the 90s.

Yeah, but Bush is President now and that's the only fact Raptor needs to think this is a major success.

[AURaptor 1,126]

Yeah, but Bush is President now and that's the only fact Raptor needs to think this is a major success.

You're right. We should start bombing this weekend. The coverage would be a great lead in to the Daytona 500.

[LegalEagle 22]

When an admitted "sellout" is bragged upon, it's bad times.

If a Dem had gotten this same deal, it would be greatly ridiculed by he who supports it now.

Does truth and consistency mean anything in your life?

[DKW 86 7,441]

I think the pointhere is that the dunder heads saying we needed direct talks with NK were proved, once again, to be completely clueless in foreign policy.

[AURaptor 1,126]

When an admitted "sellout" is bragged upon, it's bad times.

If a Dem had gotten this same deal, it would be greatly ridiculed by he who supports it now.

Does truth and consistency mean anything in your life?

Who's the 'sell out' , and who's being bragged upon?

I'd still support it, for what it DOES do. Puts N.K on record for agreeing to standards not JUST with the USA, but China, S. Korea and Japan as well. Am I naive enough to think that N.K will hold to its word ? Hell no! But we're showing the world that we've tried to use diplmoacy, NOT unilaterally, and it'll be N.K. who breaks the deal, not the USA.

I am nothing BUT consitant. You might want to try it for a while yourself.

[CCTAU 3,346]

I think the pointhere is that the dunder heads saying we needed direct talks with NK were proved, once again, to be completely clueless in foreign policy.

Why was this salient point lost on them?

[Tigermike 3,054]

[LegalEagle 22]

When an admitted "sellout" is bragged upon, it's bad times.

If a Dem had gotten this same deal, it would be greatly ridiculed by he who supports it now.

Does truth and consistency mean anything in your life?

Who's the 'sell out' , and who's being bragged upon?

I'd still support it, for what it DOES do. Puts N.K on record for agreeing to standards not JUST with the USA, but China, S. Korea and Japan as well. Am I naive enough to think that N.K will hold to its word ? Hell no! But we're showing the world that we've tried to use diplmoacy, NOT unilaterally, and it'll be N.K. who breaks the deal, not the USA.

I am nothing BUT consitant. You might want to try it for a while yourself.

This is better than real life!

See your post above, o wise man, in which you say, and I quote, "Sure, it might be a 'sell out', as Bolton says. . ."

And, "consitant" just absolutely describes AURaptor. I can't find it in my dictionary, so I guess I can define it anyway I like.