Players Rate their SEC Coaches

[DKW 86 7,426]

Found on ITAT

http://www.coachratings.com/view_ratings_football.jsp

CTT

1 = Strongly Disagree 3 = Neither Agree or Disagree 5 = Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach was interested in my personal life 3.8

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports 3.8

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports 3.2

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree 4.5

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals 3.2

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college 3.2

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports 3.0

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing 3.8

1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment 3.2

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment 3.8

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway 2.2

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions 3.5

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position 3.0

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform 1.5

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players 3.8

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race 3.8

1 2 3 4 5

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits 4.0

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity 3.5

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach 4.0

The best phrase describing Coach is: Mentor/Role Model: 25.0%

Well Respected: 50.0%

Troubled: 25.0% (I am told this includes comments from Ole Miss Players as well.)

CMS

1 = Strongly Disagree 3 = Neither Agree or Disagree 5 = Strongly Agree

1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach was interested in my personal life 3.0

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports 2.9

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports 2.9

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree 3.4

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals 3.2

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college 3.2

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports 3.0

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing 3.3

1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment 3.0

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment 3.2

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway 3.7

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions 3.1

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position 3.2

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform 2.8

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players 3.1

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race 3.4

1 2 3 4 5

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits 3.3

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity 3.2

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach 3.3

The best phrase describing Coach is: Mentor/Role Model: 14.3%

Well Respected: 42.9%

Father Figure: 4.8%

Assertive: 19.0%

Troubled: 14.3%

Corrupt: 4.8%

[WarTim 3,456]

Wow, Just WOW! That is an eye opener. I wonder how the uaters will attempt to spin this one away?

[bammanmr 0]

VERY telling numbers.

[vatz22au 142]

Wow... check out Les Miles:

http://www.coachratings.com/rating_result.jsp?cID=28

Life Outside of Sports 1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach was interested in my personal life 1.9

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports 1.8

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports 2.0

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree 3.4

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals 2.0

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college 1.9

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports 1.5

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing 2.6

Coaching Methods and Techniques 1 2 3 4 5

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment 1.9

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment 2.0

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway 2.9

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions 1.5

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position 2.4

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform 1.8

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players 1.9

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race 3.6

Coach Recommendation 1 2 3 4 5

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits 2.0

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity 1.6

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach 1.8

[DKW 86 7,426]

Wow... check out Les Miles:

http://www.coachratings.com/rating_result.jsp?cID=28

Life Outside of Sports   1   2   3   4   5  

1. Coach was interested in my personal life  1.9

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports  1.8

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports  2.0

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree  3.4

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals  2.0

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college  1.9

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports  1.5

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing  2.6

Coaching Methods and Techniques  1  2  3  4  5 

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment  1.9

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment  2.0

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway  2.9

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions  1.5

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position  2.4

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform  1.8

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players  1.9

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race  3.6

Coach Recommendation  1  2  3  4  5 

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits  2.0

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity  1.6

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach  1.8

240904[/snapback]

You forgot the last three lines on Miles...

Well Respected: 25.0%

Assertive: 12.5%

Corrupt: 62.5%

[Argo 8]

Wow... check out Les Miles:

http://www.coachratings.com/rating_result.jsp?cID=28

Life Outside of Sports   1   2   3   4   5  

1. Coach was interested in my personal life  1.9

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports  1.8

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports  2.0

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree  3.4

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals  2.0

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college  1.9

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports  1.5

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing  2.6

Coaching Methods and Techniques  1  2  3  4  5 

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment  1.9

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment  2.0

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway  2.9

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions  1.5

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position  2.4

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform  1.8

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players  1.9

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race  3.6

Coach Recommendation  1  2  3  4  5 

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits  2.0

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity  1.6

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach  1.8

240904[/snapback]

You forgot the last three lines on Miles...

Well Respected: 25.0%

Assertive: 12.5%

Corrupt: 62.5%

240954[/snapback]

I wonder if the "well respected" and "corrupt" percentages came from any OSU players. No way those results came from his players in LSU.

[DKW 86 7,426]

Wow... check out Les Miles:

http://www.coachratings.com/rating_result.jsp?cID=28

Life Outside of Sports   1   2   3   4   5  

1. Coach was interested in my personal life  1.9

2. Coach was aware of any problems that I may have had outside of sports  1.8

3. Coach tried to help me with any problems outside of sports  2.0

4. Coach emphasized receiving a degree  3.4

5. Coach took measures to help me achieve academic goals  2.0

6. Coach was concerned about my future after college  1.9

7. Coach assisted me in goals outside of sports  1.5

8. Coach encouraged learning and growing  2.6

Coaching Methods and Techniques  1  2  3  4  5 

1. Coach fulfilled the promises made during recruitment  1.9

2. Coach continued to show interest in me after recruitment  2.0

3. It was either coach’s way or the highway  2.9

4. Coach solicited input or suggestions  1.5

5. Coach was knowledgeable of my position  2.4

6. Coach would embarrass players publicly that didn’t perform  1.8

7. Coach treated me fairly in comparison to other players  1.9

8. Coach treated all players the same regardless of race  3.6

Coach Recommendation  1  2  3  4  5 

1. I would recommend Coach to recruits  2.0

2. I would work/play for Coach again if given the opportunity  1.6

3. If I had a relative that was a recruit, I would recommend Coach  1.8

240904[/snapback]

You forgot the last three lines on Miles...

Well Respected: 25.0%

Assertive: 12.5%

Corrupt: 62.5%

240954[/snapback]

I wonder if the "well respected" and "corrupt" percentages came from any OSU players. No way those results came from his players in LSU.

240956[/snapback]

Argo, they almost had to. Tommy's numbers werent as good due to Ole Misss players and the uproar over how he left. Want a laugh? Look at Jackie Sherill's numbers. They are ridiculously high. Other coaches like Bowden dont even show up? CTT's numners are great considering what the Ole Miss numbers are factored in. Kind of makes you wonder how CT rates so when some other coaches havent had job recent, within the last 6-8 years, changes.

[quietfan 233]

Notice also the CTT's results are still listed as "pending", i.e., they haven't had enough responses to finallize his ratings. Since some of the other coaches have at least 10 responses, CTT must have gotten less that if he's pending. So hold the phone...his numbers can go either direction pretty quickly with just a few new responders. Personally I'd expect him to go up, frankly I thought his current rating, while good, was lower than I anticipated.

I'm a litttle surprized that anyone rated Shula "corrupt". He may be incompetent, but I didn't think there was any hint of scandal about him. But then I did the numbers and realized that the 4.8% of his 21 responders who called him "corrupt" represents only one person. One crazy or angry person could call anybody anything--it's meaningless.

Actually, I'm not very impressed with this poll anyway. When Jackie Sherrill gets an overall 8.7 while Joe Paterno has only a 6.5 (Albeit still "pending"), I question the accuracy.

[SKCAUB 0]

Notice also the CTT's results are still  listed as "pending", i.e., they haven't had enough responses to finallize his ratings.  Since some of the other coaches have at least 10 responses, CTT must have gotten less that if he's pending.  So hold the phone...his numbers can go either direction pretty quickly with just a few new responders.  Personally I'd expect him to go up, frankly I thought his current rating, while good, was lower than I anticipated.

I'm a litttle surprized that anyone rated Shula "corrupt".  He may be incompetent, but I didn't think there was any hint of scandal about him.  But then I did the numbers and realized that the 4.8% of his 21 responders who called him "corrupt" represents only one person.  One crazy or angry person could call anybody anything--it's meaningless.

Actually, I'm not very impressed with this poll anyway.  When Jackie Sherrill gets an overall 8.7 while Joe Paterno has only a 6.5 (Albeit still "pending"), I question the accuracy.

240978[/snapback]

Sheila's a Bamar...he's part of their CHEATING culture...of course he's corrupt.