Jump to content

The Hypocrisy is nothing new


TexasTiger

Recommended Posts

Daily News (New York)

September 22, 1995, Friday

POLS WHO TALK NICE AND ACT NAUGHTY

BYLINE: BY LARS-ERIK NELSON

SECTION: Editorial Pg. 41

LENGTH: 583 words

Washington Sen. Joseph Lieberman (D-Conn.) came to the Senate floor with

a look of sad concern on his face. He was deeply troubled, he said, at the vulgar, morally repugnant content of the new TV season. "We are lowering the standards of what is acceptable in our society and we are sending a message to our children," he said. He denounced an "acceptance of rude language, foul imagery and gross behavior in the entertainment mainstream."

Then, warning parents who might be watching on C-SPAN to move their little children away from the TV sets, Lieberman cited a few of the outrages: On ABC's "Wilde Again," a character asks to be called "Daddy's little whore." Another ABC program showed an upraised middle finger. CBS' "Bless This House" used the phrase "little hooters" in reference to a girl's breasts. "Profoundly disturbing," Lieberman intoned. "Sophomoric."

Funny thing: The previous morning, Lieberman had been a guest, as is his regular custom, on the Don Imus radio show on WFAN, a program that seems to get the bulk of its yuks from penis references.

If you have never heard the Imus show, listen in. It is a cross between an endless infomercial and a bunch of 8-year-olds telling doo-doo jokes into a tape recorder. It is rescued only by increasingly rare moments of inspired, hilarious brilliance.

Tune in any morning and you'll hear Imus or one of his sidekicks joking about having "lipstick on the dipstick" and much worse. This is nationwide morning radio.

Lieberman worries, on the Senate floor, that the increasing vulgarity of network TV "is lowering the standards of what we accept on television, particularly in what used to be family programing hours."

But he's talking out of both sides of his mouth. This week's moments of supposed humor on Imus, broadcast at an hour when children are rising for school, included a reference to Attorney General Janet Reno in crotchless pantyhose, an interview with Screw Magazine's Al Goldstein and a drunken woman saying "s---" over the air. Teehee.

Lieberman is alarmed that some child watching an 8 p.m. TV show might hear the word "hooters." Yet he legitimizes, by his regular presence, a radio show that will fill the child's ears with far more vulgarity, sly racist jokes, gay-baiting and all-around bad taste than the child is ever likely to hear on TV.

Why jump into this sewer? Votes. Imus is free media. His audience consists mainly of those 18-to-34-year-old males who are so hard for a politician to reach.

The temptation is overwhelming. Sen. Bill Bradley (D-N.J.) will in one breath deplore the coarsening of our national discourse and the state of race relations, then appear on Imus where the idea of a neat joke is to suggest a black football player might be a carjacker.

Sen. Bob Dole (R-Kan.) righteously denounces Hollywood for its raunchy movies and then joins the gang on Imus for a little friendly guy banter.

You can't blame Imus for being what he is. He even serves the positive purpose of making current events entertaining. His parodies only make sense if you have been paying attention to the world around you.

But for Lieberman there is no excuse. One moment he joins the sniggering on Imus, the next he's on the Senate floor as the pious defender of family virtue against encroaching vulgarity.

By all means, Lieberman, Bradley, Dole and the rest should go on Imus. But if they do, spare us the sanctimonious sermons about the vulgarity of modern broadcasting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





Interesting story. Although I find it odd that many Libs are absent from the list of guests on Imus' show. Chris Mathews and company somehow get left out of the hypocrisy parade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting story. Although I find it odd that many Libs are absent from the list of guests on Imus' show. Chris Mathews and company somehow get left out of the hypocrisy parade.

The article mentions by name one Democrat (Bradley), one Republican (Dole), and Leiberman, who is registered as Democrat but hovers somewhere near the middle. I don't think the author meant to imply that those are the only three hypocrites in Congress, but it does seem to make the article "fair and balanced" to me.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In his defense, he was on his high horse about TV, not radio. Not real sure kids listen totalk radio. Doesn't meanI like it. But not really the same issue. Kids watch TV, they do not listen to radio.

If a show gets off track and vulger on the radio, I just turn it. I sometimes lister to the 2 live Stews. But when they get ethnic or think its funny to refer to sexual things, I turn it. But my kids (10 and 7) never listen totalk radio. But they do scan the channels on TV.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to Mathews and Russert, didn't Christopher Dodd announce his candidacy for President on the I-Man's show ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...