‘I’m not for impeachment,’ Pelosi says, potentially roiling fellow Democrats

[homersapien 11,367]

11 hours ago, kd4au said:

Not with Trump but there damn sure was with crooked Hillary.

That's funny.  Putin absolutely hates Hillary.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-22/vladimir-putin-and-hillary-clinton-hatred-explained/9783076

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-39334757/putin-hates-clinton-and-other-things-fbi-knows-about-russia

[kd4au 1,145]

46 minutes ago, homersapien said:

That's funny.  Putin absolutely hates Hillary.

https://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/clinton-putin-226153

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-05-22/vladimir-putin-and-hillary-clinton-hatred-explained/9783076

https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-us-canada-39334757/putin-hates-clinton-and-other-things-fbi-knows-about-russia

Hell who doesn't ? But he still did business with her, ever hear of uranium one ? 

[homersapien 11,367]

50 minutes ago, kd4au said:

Hell who doesn't ? But he still did business with her, ever hear of uranium one ? 

Oh puleeeze.

How about the pizza parlor trafficking in babies?

[DKW 86 7,419]

3 hours ago, TexasTiger said:

They didn’t and if they did before Mueller’s investigation how would that even be relevant today?

Wow. Yes they did. The videos have been linked on this forum several times. 

Because you know that when there is nothing there, and then the 2 year inv into it proves there is nothing there just like these well-connected people already knew.

Remember the "Nothing Burger" comment?

https://youtu.be/_FpMb6dATfo

 

[SaltyTiger 7,794]

3 hours ago, homersapien said:

That's a crazy thing to say

No it is not. 

http://time.com/5551309/trump-2020-strategy/

But regular political math doesn’t apply to this President. In fact, at this early stage, Trump’s odds of re-election are close to a coin flip. Low poll numbers didn’t keep him from winning the presidency in 2016. He defeated Hillary Clinton with just 46.1% of the popular vote and a mere 26.8% of all eligible voters.

He could repeat the same feat. According to Republican Party pollster Frank Luntz, Trump “has a greater degree of support within his party than any Republican President has ever had since they started polling.” If enough Democrats aren’t happy with the party’s nominee, overwhelming GOP support might be enough for Trump to win.

[homersapien 11,367]

22 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

No it is not. 

http://time.com/5551309/trump-2020-strategy/

But regular political math doesn’t apply to this President. In fact, at this early stage, Trump’s odds of re-election are close to a coin flip. Low poll numbers didn’t keep him from winning the presidency in 2016. He defeated Hillary Clinton with just 46.1% of the popular vote and a mere 26.8% of all eligible voters.

He could repeat the same feat. According to Republican Party pollster Frank Luntz, Trump “has a greater degree of support within his party than any Republican President has ever had since they started polling.” If enough Democrats aren’t happy with the party’s nominee, overwhelming GOP support might be enough for Trump to win.

That certainly doesn't look like "they can't beat him at the ballot box" to me. 

[SaltyTiger 7,794]

1 hour ago, homersapien said:

That certainly doesn't look like "they can't beat him at the ballot box" to me. 

I can see how you say that. Thinking that you are underestimating President Trump though. You or the left did not anticipate him being around in 2020 did you

[TexasTiger 12,836]

On 3/13/2019 at 8:51 PM, TexasTiger said:

*add Manhattan DA to the long and growing list.

“Several ongoing investigations...”