Jump to content

democrats set to release CIA "torture" report today


cooltigger21

Recommended Posts

"It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you. Give them instructions and care for them. Thus doubled agents are recruited and used." - "It is essential that justice be done and it is equally vital that justice not be confused with revenge, for the two are wholly different"

Sun Tzu

What does Sun Tzu say about using drones that kill innocent women and children?

Moving the goal post? You want to discuss Drone Warfare, start a thread and we'll go at it. So are you going to admit that torture is wrong?

No Im simply pointing out the obvious absence of a legitimate basis for your moral outrage. You've asserted that evil is absolute..how can you support a drone program and be so offended by the use of EITs that didn't kill anyone and actually helped secure info that was instrumental in not only averting further terrorist activity but also finding and killing UBL?

Holy crap dude, it's a simple question. Do you think torture is wrong?

Thats not for me to decide and I can deal with that. Extreme situations call for extreme measures. The CIA did EXACTLY what I would want and expect them to do....go to the necessary means to get whatever information that ultimately protects Americans. See, Im on OUR side! War is not a pretty thing but they were the ones who launched a jihad when they flew those arliners into the WTC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Replies 279
  • Created
  • Last Reply

"It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you. Give them instructions and care for them. Thus doubled agents are recruited and used." - "It is essential that justice be done and it is equally vital that justice not be confused with revenge, for the two are wholly different"

Sun Tzu

What does Sun Tzu say about using drones that kill innocent women and children?

Moving the goal post? You want to discuss Drone Warfare, start a thread and we'll go at it. So are you going to admit that torture is wrong?

No Im simply pointing out the obvious absence of a legitimate basis for your moral outrage. You've asserted that evil is absolute..how can you support a drone program and be so offended by the use of EITs that didn't kill anyone and actually helped secure info that was instrumental in not only averting further terrorist activity but also finding and killing UBL?

Holy crap dude, it's a simple question. Do you think torture is wrong?

Thats not for me to decide and I can deal with that. Extreme situations call for extreme measures. The CIA did EXACTLY what I would want and expect them to do....go to the necessary means to get whatever information that ultimately protects Americans. See, Im on OUR side! War is not a pretty thing but they were the ones who launched a jihad when they flew those arliners into the WTC.

Nice lofty statements. I certainly dont need a war lecture from you. So you lack any moral compass that tells if torture is wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you. Give them instructions and care for them. Thus doubled agents are recruited and used." - "It is essential that justice be done and it is equally vital that justice not be confused with revenge, for the two are wholly different"

Sun Tzu

What does Sun Tzu say about using drones that kill innocent women and children?

Moving the goal post? You want to discuss Drone Warfare, start a thread and we'll go at it. So are you going to admit that torture is wrong?

No Im simply pointing out the obvious absence of a legitimate basis for your moral outrage. You've asserted that evil is absolute..how can you support a drone program and be so offended by the use of EITs that didn't kill anyone and actually helped secure info that was instrumental in not only averting further terrorist activity but also finding and killing UBL?

Holy crap dude, it's a simple question. Do you think torture is wrong?

Thats not for me to decide and I can deal with that. Extreme situations call for extreme measures. The CIA did EXACTLY what I would want and expect them to do....go to the necessary means to get whatever information that ultimately protects Americans. See, Im on OUR side! War is not a pretty thing but they were the ones who launched a jihad when they flew those arliners into the WTC.

Nice lofty statements. I certainly dont need a war lecture from you. So you lack any moral compass that tells if torture is wrong?

Im not as preoccupied with a phony moral compass like you apparently are. Lets see...using a drone program in foreign sovereignties that ultimately kills innocent women and children...check! using EITs that kills NO ONE but potentially protects Americans..."HELL NO THATS EVIL"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"It is essential to seek out enemy agents who have come to conduct espionage against you and to bribe them to serve you. Give them instructions and care for them. Thus doubled agents are recruited and used." - "It is essential that justice be done and it is equally vital that justice not be confused with revenge, for the two are wholly different"

Sun Tzu

What does Sun Tzu say about using drones that kill innocent women and children?

Moving the goal post? You want to discuss Drone Warfare, start a thread and we'll go at it. So are you going to admit that torture is wrong?

No Im simply pointing out the obvious absence of a legitimate basis for your moral outrage. You've asserted that evil is absolute..how can you support a drone program and be so offended by the use of EITs that didn't kill anyone and actually helped secure info that was instrumental in not only averting further terrorist activity but also finding and killing UBL?

Holy crap dude, it's a simple question. Do you think torture is wrong?

Thats not for me to decide and I can deal with that. Extreme situations call for extreme measures. The CIA did EXACTLY what I would want and expect them to do....go to the necessary means to get whatever information that ultimately protects Americans. See, Im on OUR side! War is not a pretty thing but they were the ones who launched a jihad when they flew those arliners into the WTC.

Nice lofty statements. I certainly dont need a war lecture from you. So you lack any moral compass that tells if torture is wrong?

Im not as preoccupied with a phony moral compass like you apparently are. Lets see...using a drone program in foreign sovereignties that ultimately kills innocent women and children...check! using EITs that kills NO ONE but potentially protects Americans..."HELL NO THATS EVIL"

Collateral damage is an unfortunate part of war and it does carry a moral burden. But not as great as deliberately torturing another human.

I think the moral implications of war is a fit subject for debate. Torture of individuals? Not so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

Context is a liberal's friend when dismissing Obama's direct quotes but all of you seem all too willing to dismiss the context of these events. It happened, its over and has been dealt with. There is nothing to be gained by re-litigating here. Besides, aren't you people convinced that there's nothing exceptional about America?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

ut

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. (I don't get what you mean by our oath to COTUS. Presumably you are referring to the Constitution, but one doesn't make an oath to the constitution. One makes an oath to support the constitution. The oath is made to the controlling authorities of the state.)

My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

The point is this. Obama said the events that occurred at Gitmo, as it relates to the use of EITs, are not what we are or who we are as a nation. Does that statement support his previous references that American is no more exceptional than Greece thinks they are or Spain thinks they are? This is all about politics. The Intelligence Committee KNEW the entirety of the EITs a FULL 8 YEARS AGO. Amazing how much more evil they became on the eve of them losing control of the Senate.

Nobody has suggested that use of these EITs should be adopted as a procedural policy practice..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

Context is a liberal's friend when dismissing Obama's direct quotes but all of you seem all too willing to dismiss the context of these events. It happened, its over and has been dealt with. There is nothing to be gained by re-litigating here. Besides, aren't you people convinced that there's nothing exceptional about America?

I don't understand your point, if you have one. But the value of openly releasing this information is to affirm our principals.

If one is willing to accept torture is business as usual, that affirms there is nothing exceptional about America.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

ut

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. (I don't get what you mean by our oath to COTUS. Presumably you are referring to the Constitution, but one doesn't make an oath to the constitution. One makes an oath to support the constitution. The oath is made to the controlling authorities of the state.)

My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

MY oath is to support and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And yes, COTUS stands for Constitution of the United States. As a former enlisted soldier and commissioned officer in the USCGR I'm familiar with my oath. Within that oath is the UCMJ and the rules that apply to the oath and the orders of the President.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

The point is this. Obama said the events that occurred at Gitmo, as it relates to the use of EITs, are not what we are or who we are as a nation. Does that statement support his previous references that American is no more exceptional than Greece thinks they are or Spain thinks they are? This is all about politics. The Intelligence Committee KNEW the entirety of the EITs a FULL 8 YEARS AGO. Amazing how much more evil they became on the eve of them losing control of the Senate.

Nobody has suggested that use of these EITs should be adopted as a procedural policy practice..

Again, I don't get your point. Do you disagree with either of Obama's statements? Is one contingent on the other?

(And I would like to see the direct quote before running down this rabbit hole.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

ut

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. (I don't get what you mean by our oath to COTUS. Presumably you are referring to the Constitution, but one doesn't make an oath to the constitution. One makes an oath to support the constitution. The oath is made to the controlling authorities of the state.)

My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

MY oath is to support and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And yes, COTUS stands for Constitution of the United States. As a former enlisted soldier and commissioned officer in the USCGR I'm familiar with my oath. Within that oath is the UCMJ and the rules that apply to the oath and the orders of the President.

Fine.

My contention still stands though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

ut

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. (I don't get what you mean by our oath to COTUS. Presumably you are referring to the Constitution, but one doesn't make an oath to the constitution. One makes an oath to support the constitution. The oath is made to the controlling authorities of the state.)

My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

MY oath is to support and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And yes, COTUS stands for Constitution of the United States. As a former enlisted soldier and commissioned officer in the USCGR I'm familiar with my oath. Within that oath is the UCMJ and the rules that apply to the oath and the orders of the President.

Fine.

My contention still stands though.

Did you think I would expect anything else? :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

ut

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

"all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." refers to our oath to COTUS! Not this. This isn't about citizens....but I guess illegals should shutter. ;)

Sorry, but I don't get your point. (I don't get what you mean by our oath to COTUS. Presumably you are referring to the Constitution, but one doesn't make an oath to the constitution. One makes an oath to support the constitution. The oath is made to the controlling authorities of the state.)

My contention remains. A government who is willing to secretly torture an enemy of the state is not going to hesitate to torture a citizen if they consider him or her an enemy of the state.

MY oath is to support and DEFEND the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. And yes, COTUS stands for Constitution of the United States. As a former enlisted soldier and commissioned officer in the USCGR I'm familiar with my oath. Within that oath is the UCMJ and the rules that apply to the oath and the orders of the President.

Man I had a buddy in the Coast Guard and I had no idea how actively involved they are or, at least were at one time, in the war on drugs. Dude told me some stories that were hair raising about raids and fire fights that I had no idea would involve the Coast Guard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

Its different when you're in the foxhole

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4CWk5LfoH0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Im not as preoccupied with a phony moral compass like you apparently are. Lets see...using a drone program in foreign sovereignties that ultimately kills innocent women and children...check! using EITs that kills NO ONE but potentially protects Americans..."HELL NO THATS EVIL"

Didn't I just write that if you wanted to discuss Drone Wars, start a new thread? However, if you can't understand the simple contextual differences between collateral damage on the battlefield and human torture off the battlefield, I doubt you would be able to keep up. I'd warp your brain on the intricacies of drone policy. Oh and while you're standing on your figurative pile of tortured bodies with your chest out feeling awesome about yourself; I'd be careful using drones as your go-to move. As a CIA apologist you'll be working overtime to explain away their extrajudicial drone strikes.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you libs propose we handle these people? How do yo propose we get the intelligence from them. Do you want to trat them like street criminals and have them given access to our court system? Tell me how you would handle it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What do you libs propose we handle these people? How do yo propose we get the intelligence from them. Do you want to trat them like street criminals and have them given access to our court system? Tell me how you would handle it.

We get it the way that studies have shown to be the most effective.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A government that is willing to secretly torture our enemies is capable and likely to torture it's own citizens. After all, the phrase is "all 'enemies' foreign and domestic." Besides, it secret. Who will know?

Sounds like many of you are not as opposed to a "big brother" government as you say you are.

Its different when you're in the foxhole

https://www.youtube....h?v=p4CWk5LfoH0

Knowing how much you revere Schumer's opinion on all things :-\ , I hate to tell you, Chuck is wrong about this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the story of a man in Northern Afghanistan – let’s call him Ahmad (or Mahmud) – who simply was at the wrong place at the wrong time. And likely with the wrong name – also his real name is a pretty common one in Afghanistan.

Put yourself into the shoes of Ahmad (or Mahmud) who is minding his own business. Three of your brothers work with international organizations while you are looking after the family’s property. Then, the following happens:

One day in October or November 2009, 8:00 pm

Men with black turbans turn up at your doorstep. You know who they are. They are the Taliban. They used to be around until an international invasion expelled them in 2001. Now they are back, and nobody has stopped them from coming back. They may be armed or not, but you know what they can do. They ask for food and tea and request that you wash their car. You could refuse but that would likely get you killed, you know that. Who are you to turn these men away, especially as there is nobody to protect you? There are no police or soldiers—there is just you and them. So you do what everybody willing to survive would do: you serve them tea and food and wash their car. And hope they go away and leave you alone again. And eventually, with full bellies and shiny Ford Rangers, they go. You are relieved and go to sleep.

2:00 am, the same night

Baaaaaang! Your door is blown open and men — curiously bearded, though un-turbaned — storm into your house. They push you to the floor, handcuff you, ask you questions, search your sitting room, your kitchen, your toilet, even the women’s quarters that are taboo for any outsider. All that while you lie helplessly on the floor, not sure what is happening, not sure what these men want. They keep asking you about the Taliban. But the Taliban are gone, you tell them this. All you did was to serve them tea and food and wash their car to stay alive. And while you still lie on the floor and the foreigners continue searching your house, you see that one of them accidentally steps on your one-year old daughter. But there is nothing you can do, nothing to protect the honour of your women, your house, your one-year old daughter. Then they put a black hood over your head and as they march you outside your daughter’s sobbing is quickly drowned out by the sharp thudding of a rotor blade.

??? am/pm

You don’t know where they have taken you… When the hood is removed you are in an empty room. It is terribly cold, there is cold air blowing from somewhere. All you have is your shalwar kamiz, no blanket and nothing. It is close to winter. Why is there cold air and not heat? You don’t know where you are, you don’t know what the time is, you are cold and hungry. There is a horrible noise in the background, the light is on, you cannot sleep and there is this one terrible image in your mind: the man with the big boots stepping on your daughter and you could do nothing. They take you out to be questioned every so often; always you are hooded so you don’t know where they are taking you. You don’t remember how often, you don’t know if it’s day or night. They ask you who the Taliban were, what they wanted, whether you are one of them etc. etc. etc. You keep telling them who you are and that all you did was give them tea and food and wash their car. They keep asking the same questions over and over again, several times a day – or maybe night. You don’t know how long you’ve been gone, what time of the day it is. You have barely slept, you are tired and cold and the strange music is driving you crazy.

2 weeks later

All of sudden you get hooded and again put in a helicopter. You are dropped in a pasture, given 2,000 Afghani and told to go home. The first questions you have are: What time is it? What day is it? Where am I? You find out that you have been held for two weeks and you are in a Southeastern province. And you have only 2,000 Afghani to get home. But somehow you manage to get home. You find your house. Your family was worried. They did not know if you were alive and, if alive, where you were. You are glad your family is okay and your daughter has recovered somewhat. All you want is to go to sleep and forget the past two weeks.

The next morning

The black-turbaned men are back. They want to know where you’ve been. What you have told the foreigners. You put them in your guesthouse and, afraid of another repeat, take your family and flee for the city. You have to leave your property behind because there is nobody to protect you against the Taliban, and those who are supposed to protect you think you are one of them. You were treated like a criminal – but of course you do not know that your treatment is considered torture and breaks the Geneva Conventions. How would you know? You still think of torture as being hung from the ceiling by your feet as some commanders used to do or the beatings of the Taliban. All they did was freeze you and keep you from sleeping and make you crazy with a strange sort of noise. And in the end, the worst thing for you was that they stepped on your daughter. The image stays with you and tortures you more than anything they did to you. And you cannot complain to anybody. Who would hear you out? You are only a simple man, called Ahmad (or Mahmud).

This is a true story, albeit the name of the person is changed and the places are kept general. I was told the story on a recent trip to Northern Afghanistan. And it was not the first time I’ve heard such a story. In fact, I’ve heard many like this but mostly in the Southeast and South so far. Now they’ve reached up to the North as well, with the increased ‘kinetic activities’ there during the past couple of months.

For some reason this one stuck in my memory and during one of these nights where I’m haunted by insomnia, I thought I wanted to share his story – as possibly nobody else was there to tell it.

There might be merit in trying to hunt down top leaders of the Taliban through house searches. Until you get the wrong Ahmad (or Mahmud), maybe because you got the wrong house, maybe because somebody gave you wrong information, maybe because somebody had a score to settle with that particular man, maybe because some military still does not understand that feeding the Taliban does not mean you sympathize with them but that you are just trying to stay alive.

This is a problem that affects more and more Afghans who are caught between a rock and a hard place. It gives them less and less choice. Our Ahmad (or Mahmud) only fled to the next city – to be left alone. Another one may decide to join the Taliban instead, to protect his honour, that of his woman, to revenge his daughter being stepped upon.

Is it enough to say “sorry” after we got the wrong Ahmad or Mahmud – in case we even bother to do so? Is it okay to say sorry, if we continue to break into the houses of other Ahmads and Mahmuds? If for every five or ten we do this to, we maybe get the one we wanted – what about the other four or nine? We always criticize the Taliban and Afghan government for acting with impunity, yet we do the same and justify it with international security and counter-terrorism.

Yes, there is a war in Afghanistan, yes there is an insurgency, and yes there are bad people who do bad things. But there are also reasons why there is are the Geneva Conventions and international conventions protecting human rights. They remind us that everybody has a right to be treated with dignity, even if he is called Ahmad (or Mahmud) and has hosted some Taliban. It is dangerous to continue justifying actions that denigrate unprotected human beings with national or international security – after Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and Bagram. As the late John F. Kennedy in his famed civil rights address noted: “the rights of all men are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened.”https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/until-you-get-the-wrong-ahmad/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.....the wannabee admiral has spoken. let us all do as told.

If you don't have anything to contribute but ad hominem attacks, just don't post.

Easy...I've seen it both ways here. Buck up or lead by example. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.....the wannabee admiral has spoken. let us all do as told.

If you don't have anything to contribute but ad hominem attacks, just don't post.

Easy...I've seen it both ways here. Buck up or lead by example. ;)

+1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...