JoeBags7277 734 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 A question to conservatives; would you prefer Hilary or Bernie as your president? Serious question these are your only choices. Bernie, hands down. I actually agree with him here and there- mainly on civil liberties/ Drug War related stuff. Plus, his goofy unicorn and rainbows economic BS would almost certainly be stymied in Congress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeBags7277 734 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ahhhhhhhhhh! We are all going to die! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh! Socialism! It's everywhere! Ah yes, the snowplow. A device so complex, so sophisticated, so cutting-edge, that only government can put it to good use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TexasTiger 13,053 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ahhhhhhhhhh! We are all going to die! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh! Socialism! It's everywhere! Ah yes, the snowplow. A device so complex, so sophisticated, so cutting-edge, that only government can put it to good use. I think you miss the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU_Tiger_88 417 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 I think that the DNC will eventually dump her and get uncle Joe to run. That's what I hope will happen. If they try this too late in the race, they may have to change their rules at the convention which could cause nation wide revolt. For instance if Bernie had the actual votes to win the nomination (depending upon when uncle Joe is inserted) can you imagine the outrage by Bernies peeps...Sorry about the double post...on a slow network overseas without that much patience.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeBags7277 734 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ahhhhhhhhhh! We are all going to die! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh! Socialism! It's everywhere! Ah yes, the snowplow. A device so complex, so sophisticated, so cutting-edge, that only government can put it to good use. I think you miss the point. No, I get it. "Snowplows are good to have when it snows. Government has snowplows. Therefore, let me apply a poor understanding of the meaning of the word 'socialism' to make someone feel hypocritical, and fool them into thinking if you don't want something done by government, you must not want it done at all." No, I get it quite well. I just find it a little tedious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 I think that the DNC will eventually dump her and get uncle Joe to run. That's what I hope will happen. If they try this too late in the race, they may have to change their rules at the convention which could cause nation wide revolt. For instance if Bernie had the actual votes to win the nomination (depending upon when uncle Joe is inserted) can you imagine the outrage by Bernies peeps... I think that the DNC will eventually dump her and get uncle Joe to run. That's what I hope will happen. If they try this too late in the race, they may have to change their rules at the convention which could cause nation wide revolt. For instance if Bernie had the actual votes to win the nomination (depending upon when uncle Joe is inserted) can you imagine the outrage by Bernies peeps... Despite the support Bernie has in Iowa and New Hampshire, he will never be able to get the nomination. He'll never get enough of the coalition that helped propel Obama to the nomination in 08 to pass Hillary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Ahhhhhhhhhh! We are all going to die! Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh! Socialism! It's everywhere! Ah yes, the snowplow. A device so complex, so sophisticated, so cutting-edge, that only government can put it to good use. I think you miss the point. No, I get it. "Snowplows are good to have when it snows. Government has snowplows. Therefore, let me apply a poor understanding of the meaning of the word 'socialism' to make someone feel hypocritical, and fool them into thinking if you don't want something done by government, you must not want it done at all." No, I get it quite well. I just find it a little tedious. It's more than just the snowplow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 A funny thing happened on the way to Hillary vs Bush 2016: In spite of Hillary's self inflicted problems with the truth, I do hope she still wins the democrat nomination because anyone the republicans nominate will beat her lying unethical arse. Funny how her campaign had pimped her as the smartest most qualified candidate ever until now she is supposedly the "passive recipient of unwitting information". WUT? If democrats buy this line of BS, they are the most willfully ignorant people on the planet. HRC is a crooked snake literally obsessed with the acquisition of money and power and has demonstrated, dare I say, a sociopathic eagerness to say or do whatever she has to to accomplish those objectives. Her server was put in place to circumvent oversight, which implies criminal intent....THE END! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Keep on believing, a'ight? You're the exact Hildawg devotee I had in mind when willful ignorance sprung to mind. This snapshot is taken 10 months prior to the actual election and the best is yet to come for Hildawg...watch! And, ANYONE who believes America would elect a 74 year old cranky socialist promoting political revolution is beyond nuts.....Hey Bernie...the 60s called they want their ideology back! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Keep on believing, a'ight? You're the exact Hildawg devotee I had in mind when willful ignorance sprung to mind. This snapshot is taken 10 months prior to the actual election and the best is yet to come for Hildawg...watch! I just posted a poll. You got a little spittle on your bib. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Keep on believing, a'ight? You're the exact Hildawg devotee I had in mind when willful ignorance sprung to mind. This snapshot is taken 10 months prior to the actual election and the best is yet to come for Hildawg...watch! I just posted a poll. You got a little spittle on your bib. Enjoy your imaginary "lead" while it lasts because its definitely in its sunset phase. I love the title...."expected winner" hell ole Hildawg was the presumptive Queen simply awaiting coronation 6 months ago...hows that expectation working out fer her? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,128 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. I will say this. We've been down this road before with Bill and Hillary. Many times we've thought this is the end of them. Yet they still have a knack for evading trouble and sticking around. I'm not convinced she will be indicted. Now this is all great campaign material for the eventual Republican nominee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUUSN 823 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. Raptor waiting on an indictment like.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. I will say this. We've been down this road before with Bill and Hillary. Many times we've thought this is the end of them. Yet they still have a knack for evading trouble and sticking around. I'm not convinced she will be indicted. Now this is all great campaign material for the eventual Republican nominee. NOT when the issue was espionage and compromising the security of the country. This is a far different set of issues. This is not just cattle futures, or file gate, lying about sex in the Oval Office or any number of other unsavory or unethical scams run by the Clintons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. I will say this. We've been down this road before with Bill and Hillary. Many times we've thought this is the end of them. Yet they still have a knack for evading trouble and sticking around. I'm not convinced she will be indicted. Now this is all great campaign material for the eventual Republican nominee. NOT when the issue was espionage and compromising the security of the country. This is a far different set of issues. This is not just cattle futures, or file gate, lying about sex in the Oval Office or any number of other unsavory or unethical scams run by the Clintons. You've got to have a U.S. attorney willing to bring the indictment. Is there one that will? Does Bill have something that would cause fhe administration to hold off and not do anything. The FBI can't bring charges on their own. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. ya know I still have mixed feelings about whether or not she will actually be indicted because of the possible existing connecting treads that may run back to the WH. Its amazing how much weight a tiny thread can withhold when exposure of executive malfeasance is also a possible outcome. Our status as a banana republic will have never been more completely accomplished should she skate entirely unscathed. At the minimum, however, it should ruin her dream of becoming the next POTUS and Im fine with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 Can't help but notice how some here ignore the obvious, Hillary's impending indictment, and her undeniable lies, and just carry on as if it's just another election. I will say this. We've been down this road before with Bill and Hillary. Many times we've thought this is the end of them. Yet they still have a knack for evading trouble and sticking around. I'm not convinced she will be indicted. Now this is all great campaign material for the eventual Republican nominee. NOT when the issue was espionage and compromising the security of the country. This is a far different set of issues. This is not just cattle futures, or file gate, lying about sex in the Oval Office or any number of other unsavory or unethical scams run by the Clintons. You've got to have a U.S. attorney willing to bring the indictment. Is there one that will? Does Bill have something that would cause fhe administration to hold off and not do anything. The FBI can't bring charges on their own. I understand the process but this is such an egregious abuse of power I predict that James Comey will go public with FBI findings if the DoJ refuses to indict and they may, on that we agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,128 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
homersapien 11,461 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. That's absurd. No reasonable person would consider this equivalent to Watergate. That's why it's doesn't have the attention you think it deserves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,128 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. That's absurd. No reasonable person would consider this equivalent to Watergate. That's why it's doesn't have the attention you think it deserves. She lied. Flat out. How do you not understand this ? She's put this nation's security at risk. There's no way to gloss over that fact, homer. That you WISH it weren't true, or don't want to face the facts, doesn't change them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. is it not hysterically funny to you that the very person they have been pimping as the smartest and most qualified candidate ever we're now supposed to believe she is a "passive recipient of unwitting information"? If she was ever the former, there's no way she could ever be the latter but that's the narrative because the truth no longer matters to the MSM when it comes to protecting their sacred cows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBlueVue 177 Posted January 30, 2016 Author Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. That's absurd. No reasonable person would consider this equivalent to Watergate. That's why it's doesn't have the attention you think it deserves. WOW...what SAP secrets did Nixon's crowd, through gross negligence, make available to the Chinese, the North Koreans or the Russians or anyone else who was simply curios? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURaptor 1,128 Posted January 30, 2016 Share Posted January 30, 2016 This is so much bigger than Watergate, and yet, the MSM STILL are treating it as an ooopsie, and nothing more. is it not hysterically funny to you that the very person they have been pimping as the smartest and most qualified candidate ever we're now supposed to believe she is a "passive recipient of unwitting information"? If she was ever the former, there's no way she could ever be the later but that's the narrative because the truth no longer matters to the MSM when it comes to protecting their sacred cows. Not to mention the thyroid problems she's having, and likely other health issues. This isn't FDR, where the White House can hide the fact that he had polio. In 2016, there is far less they can cover up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.