Jump to content

Moore or Jones?


DKW 86

Moore or Jones?  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. Moore or Jones?

    • Moore
      16
    • Jones
      26
    • Other
      10


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

It's not up to me to divine what you meant or intended to say.   You said what you said, then tried to act as if it clearly meant something else.  You either aren't effective at communicating your thoughts or you simply got schooled and changed your argument to try and save face.  Either way, it's on you.

...

I miss Weegs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Replies 712
  • Created
  • Last Reply
3 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

It's not up to me to divine what you meant or intended to say.   You said what you said, then tried to act as if it clearly meant something else.  You either aren't effective at communicating your thoughts or you simply got schooled and changed your argument to try and save face.  Either way, it's on you.

I said what I said and it meant what I said it meant. You don't have the luxury of dictating ones thoughts. IIWII.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AUFAN78 said:

I said what I said and it meant what I said it meant. 

Then in the future, use words that correspond to what you meant.  You failed to accomplish that this time.

 

Just now, AUFAN78 said:

You don't have the luxury of dictating ones thoughts. IIWII.  

Drama queen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AUFAN78 said:

I said what I said and it meant what I said it meant. You don't have the luxury of dictating ones thoughts. IIWII.  

I haven't seen an individual spin their wheels this badly in quite some time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

r/nottheonion

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/12/roy_moore_sits_down_for_interv.html

Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore recently sat down for an interview with a 12-year-old girl in a meeting arranged by a pro-Trump political action committee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

Then in the future, use words that correspond to what you meant.  You failed to accomplish that this time

I actually give you a pass on this, early on. The troubling aspect came after I told you specifically what it meant yet you continued to force a false narrative instead of listening. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

RCP Wisconsin average was Clinton +6.5. That was not within the margin of error. 

Final result: Trump +0.8 in Wisconsin

Wisconsin was a 7.3 point swing.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/wi/wisconsin_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5976.html

PPP had Michigan going for Clinton +5

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-6008.html

 

Some of the swing states were WAY off. In fact, Trump won the popular vote in the 13 swing states by almost 1 million (816,128 to be exact).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Auburnfan91 said:

RCP Wisconsin average was Clinton +6.5. That was not within the margin of error. 

Final result: Trump +0.8 in Wisconsin

Wisconsin was a 7.3 point swing.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/wi/wisconsin_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5976.html

PPP had Michigan going for Clinton +5

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-6008.html

 

Some of the swing states were WAY off. In fact, Trump won the popular vote in the 13 swing states by almost 1 million (816,128 to be exact).

Already been discussed.

5 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Yep. And I said as much. Pollsters in the rust belt have some explaining to do. That's why I'm skeptical of the Fox poll I posted earlier. I don't think they know how to poll our state in a competitive race. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Not my impression. Claiming they don't have the money after giving 1000x the cost away as tax breaks for the super rich strikes me as the defense of the damned.

I don't think the " super rich"  pay a lot of taxes period BB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

I actually give you a pass on this, early on. The troubling aspect came after I told you specifically what it meant yet you continued to force a false narrative instead of listening. 

You keep calling it a false narrative, but unless you're willing to walk back your words and rephrase, you might as well be trying to tell us that up is down or war is peace. It doesn't jive. You said what you said, and you're only reinforcing this self ownage until you do so.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

I don't think the " super rich"  pay a lot of taxes period BB. 

Well, we just gave them massive tax breaks, orders of magnitude greater than the cost of funding the Children's Health Insurance Program. 1 ******* trillion vs a mere 14 billion by comparison. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

You keep calling it a false narrative, but unless you're willing to walk back your words and rephrase, you might as well be trying to tell us that up is down or war is peace. It doesn't jive. You said what you said, and you're only reinforcing this self ownage until you do so.

Just stop. I told you what it meant. Try listening for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Auburnfan91 said:

RCP Wisconsin average was Clinton +6.5. That was not within the margin of error. 

Final result: Trump +0.8 in Wisconsin

Wisconsin was a 7.3 point swing.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/wi/wisconsin_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-5976.html

PPP had Michigan going for Clinton +5

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2016/president/mi/michigan_trump_vs_clinton_vs_johnson_vs_stein-6008.html

 

Some of the swing states were WAY off. In fact, Trump won the popular vote in the 13 swing states by almost 1 million (816,128 to be exact).

Wasting your time. JMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

Just stop. I told you what it meant. Try listening for a change.

You’d think that, given all your anti socialist leanings, you would try harder to not be publicly owned. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

Well, we just gave them massive tax breaks, orders of magnitude greater than the cost of funding the Children's Health Insurance Program. 1 ******* trillion vs a mere 14 billion by comparison. 

I said they pay very little taxes period. probably did not give them anything at the end of the day.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bigbens42 said:

You’d think that, given all your anti socialist leanings, you would try harder to not be publicly owned. 

As a self anointed intelligent liberal, one would think you'd have a better grasp on the truth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, SaltyTiger said:

I said they pay very little taxes period. probably did not give them anything at the end of the day.  

Have you looked into the bill? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

As a self anointed intelligent liberal, one would think you'd have a better grasp on the truth. 

Problem is, you seem to have a real problem with the concept of truth.

Doubling down when your error was explained was a dumb thing to do. Continuing the argument, acting like we're stupid because we can only read what you type and not your mind, rather than admit the error, clarify and apologize, even dumber. 

It's like you were told the other day: We need thoughtful, independent thinking conservative voices around here. We've already met our quota for howler monkeys. You're capable of doing better, so get on with it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

Problem is, you seem to have a real problem with the concept of truth.

Doubling down when your error was explained was a dumb thing to do. Continuing the argument, acting like we're stupid because we can only read what you type and not your mind, rather than admit the error, clarify and apologize, even dumber. 

It's like you were told the other day: We need thoughtful, independent thinking conservative voices around here. We've already met our quota for howler monkeys. You're capable of doing better, so get on with it. 

You continue to run with a false narrative, one you helped create. As I told Titan, I can give you a pass early on, but you keep dismissing the part where I told you what I meant. You have no excuse beyond that. 

Let me add, do not try to assign me an ideological box. You're powerless in than endeavor.

Since you brought up howler monkeys, have you read your posts on this thread? You've been howling all day after being clearly told the intent of the message. Just saying.

You are capable of listening. Try it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

I actually give you a pass on this, early on. The troubling aspect came after I told you specifically what it meant yet you continued to force a false narrative instead of listening. 

You didn't tell me what you 'really' meant until what you said had been utterly dismantled for the nonsensical waste of keystrokes that it was.  If you mean something other than what you actually say, then it's on you for communicating poorly.  Own your own crap and quit trying to blame others for your poor arguments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AUFAN78 said:

You continue to run with a false narrative, one you helped create. As I told Titan, I can give you a pass early on, but you keep dismissing the part where I told you what I meant. You have no excuse beyond that. 

You've given no one a pass.  You said dumb stuff and got clobbered for it.  Instead of simply admitting that you didn't articulate your thoughts very well and then proceed from there, you pull this horse***t.  No one is fooled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Ok. What an odd rally. 

How is #jewlawyer not trending? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Ok. What an odd rally. 

 
Mrs. Moore on her husband’s broad-mindness: “One of our attorneys is a Jew.” Happy Hanukkah, Counselor. You could be in for a lot of work!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...