Is the Electoral Fix Already In?

[homersapien 11,431]

7 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

The actual letter to the DOJ was submitted for viewing previously in this thread. Go read it.

No, you quote it.  I am not here to do the tedious work of posting for you.

I listened to the video and I assume it was more of the same.

(And BTW, a complaint to the DOJ does not constitute evidence without actual evidence supporting it.)

[homersapien 11,431]

9 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

BS. Your bias won't allow you to read it. Tell the truth.

Hint:  Persistence is a poor substitute for actual substance. 

Provide it.

[AUFAN78 3,926]

Headed out to go shoot something. 🦌 Later....

[TexasTiger 13,005]

On 1/26/2024 at 8:43 PM, AUFAN78 said:

I mentioned in a separate thread yesterday about my neighbor, a Russian immigrant, stating she saw signs of her homeland politics in our politics today. Specifically censorship and propaganda. That's disheartening to hear and then I read this today from a liberal journalist who lived and worked in Russia.

The 2024 presidential race increasingly looks like it will be decided by lawyers, not voters, as Democrats unveil plans for America's first lawfare election.

https://www.racket.news/p/is-the-electoral-fix-already-in

 

It’s over. Best not to even vote. Tell all your friends.

[SaltyTiger 7,854]

5 hours ago, homersapien said:

Not without major electoral reform. 

What reform would suit you?

[AUFAN78 3,926]

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

 

  Cite it.

(You'll need to do better than presenting a bunch of snowflakes complaining about internet insults.)

I did earlier in the thread. I can't read it for you. 

[AUFAN78 3,926]

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

No, you quote it.  I am not here to do the tedious work of posting for you.

I listened to the video and I assume it was more of the same.

(And BTW, a complaint to the DOJ does not constitute evidence without actual evidence supporting it.)

I've posted it in this thread. I cannot read it for you. 

[AUFAN78 3,926]

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

Hint:  Persistence is a poor substitute for actual substance. 

Provide it.

I've already provided it in this thread. I cannot read it for you.

[AUFAN78 3,926]

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/2834861/no-labels-undeterred-onslaught-legal-complaints-targeting-third-party-ballot-initiative/

“As a partisan, you can think it might make it harder for you to win elections, but how can you think that that is an appropriate legal justification to ask the courts to keep this group off the ballot explicitly because, ‘Hey, this is going to make our lives a little harder at the ballot box,'” Clancy added. “That’s a joke, and it gives away the game that all this talk about protecting democracy is really just about protecting turf.”

 

He said that if he could make a plea to Democrats and Republicans, it would be to ask them why a third-party initiative is gaining such popularity.

“You’d be a lot better served spending less time trying to shut down independent voices and spend more time wondering, ‘Why is it that voters are so hungry for them in the first place?'” Clancy said.

[homersapien 11,431]

13 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

I've already provided it in this thread. I cannot read it for you.

I was referring to actual evidence, not mere accusations.

[AUFAN78 3,926]

8 hours ago, homersapien said:

I was referring to actual evidence, not mere accusations.

It is in the thread too. I cannot read it for you.