Jump to content

Tommy Tuberville's brother speaks out


AURex

Recommended Posts

"I feel compelled to distance myself from his ignorant, hateful rants," musician Charles Tuberville said about the Alabama politician.

Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) has recently come under fire for making incendiary comments related to race — with even his own brother now voicing disapproval.

On Friday, musician Charles Tuberville, who has reportedly played with B.B. King, Leon Russell, Johnny Winter, Delbert McClinton and other stars, took to Facebook to condemn his politician sibling.

“Due to recent statements by him promoting racial stereotypes, white nationalism and other various controversial topics, I feel compelled to distance myself from his ignorant, hateful rants,” wrote the songsmith.

“I DO NOT agree with any of the vile rhetoric coming out of his mouth,” he added. “Please don’t confuse my brother with me. Thanks.”

Welp, okay then, no confusion.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





I am embarrassed that Tuberville was ever associated with Auburn University. Think about the incredible Auburn representation who was associated with the 2004 squad. Caddy, J Cam, Ronnie, Borges, Travis Williams...etc etc. And then you have a piece of human trash like Tommy Tuberville. I'd take Chiz, Gus, or Hugh any day over Tubs. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe I’ve been under a rock, but what has CTT said thats racist?   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When asked if he believed white nationalists should be allowed in the U.S. military, Tuberville responded, “Well, they call them that. I call them Americans.”

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, AURex said:

When asked if he believed white nationalists should be allowed in the U.S. military, Tuberville responded, “Well, they call them that. I call them Americans.”

 

Plus a few other things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, AURex said:

When asked if he believed white nationalists should be allowed in the U.S. military, Tuberville responded, “Well, they call them that. I call them Americans.”

 

How would you define “white nationalist”?  Let’s take a look at the terminology.  I’ll assume we can all define “white”, so we’ll move along to the definition of “nationalist”.  All info below is from Merriam-Webster.  

nationalist

1 of 2

noun

na·tion·al·ist ˈna-sh(ə-)nə-list 
 
plural nationalists
1
: an advocate of or believer in nationalism
 
2
: a member of a political party or group advocating national independence or strong national government
 

nationalist

2 of 2

adjective

1
: of, relating to, or advocating nationalism
 
2
: of, relating to, or being a political group advocating or associated with nationalism
 
So, this doesn’t really answer the question, so let’s take a look at “nationalism”:
 

nationalism

noun

na·tion·al·ism ˈna-sh(ə-)nə-ˌli-zəm 
 
1
: loyalty and devotion to a nation
especially  : a sense of national consciousness (see CONSCIOUSNESSsense 1c) exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups 
Intense nationalism was one of the causes of the war. 
 
 
2
: a nationalist movement or government
 
Taking a look at the whole term changes the definition a bit:
 

white nationalist

noun

 
plural white nationalists
: one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy (see WHITE SUPREMACY sense 1) and advocate enforced racial segregation
… his vision for the community—an enclave where residents fly "racialist" banners, where they are able to import enough … white nationalists to take control of the town government …John Eligon
 
white nationalism noun
  or less commonly White Nationalism
… a far right platform that includes white nationalism and opposition to Israel.

But, here is another term that is also listed: 
 

black nationalist

noun

 
variants  or Black Nationalist
plural black nationalists or Black Nationalists
: a member of a Black advocacy group in the U.S. especially during the 1960's and 1970's that sought to empower Black people financially, promote a sense of Black community and identity, and form a separate self-governing Black nation  
 
often used before another noun
black nationalist groupsa Black Nationalist leader
 
Just wondering why the question or concept of a ban wouldn’t related to ALL racists?  Also, in a society that seems to love throwing around labels of “racist” very subjectively- how exactly would this be enforced?  Surely you wouldn’t base it on an opinion, right?  How about conviction of a crime?  That seems fair, right - well the good news is that is already in place.   The military also discharges / prevents entry (or at least did when I was in) for having racist tattoos, Nazi flags, and other clear identifiers of racism.  
 
Surely this one comment isn’t the only “evidence” the man is a racist?   Shouldn’t we be a little more careful before slapping a label like this on someone without some type of proof?  We seem quick to use the term “racist” as a weapon in this day & age for people we don’t agree with politically, and that’s pretty dangerous for everyone.  
Edited by GoAU
  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoAU said:

How would you define “white nationalist”?  Let’s take a look at the terminology.  I’ll assume we can all define “white”, so we’ll move along to the definition of “nationalist”.  All info below is from Merriam-Webster.  

nationalist

1 of 2

noun

na·tion·al·ist ˈna-sh(ə-)nə-list 
 
plural nationalists
1
: an advocate of or believer in nationalism
 
2
: a member of a political party or group advocating national independence or strong national government
 

nationalist

2 of 2

adjective

1
: of, relating to, or advocating nationalism
 
2
: of, relating to, or being a political group advocating or associated with nationalism
 
So, this doesn’t really answer the question, so let’s take a look at “nationalism”:
 

nationalism

noun

na·tion·al·ism ˈna-sh(ə-)nə-ˌli-zəm 
 
1
: loyalty and devotion to a nation
especially  : a sense of national consciousness (see CONSCIOUSNESSsense 1c) exalting one nation above all others and placing primary emphasis on promotion of its culture and interests as opposed to those of other nations or supranational groups 
Intense nationalism was one of the causes of the war. 
 
 
2
: a nationalist movement or government
 
Taking a look at the whole term changes the definition a bit:
 

white nationalist

noun

 
plural white nationalists
: one of a group of militant white people who espouse white supremacy (see WHITE SUPREMACY sense 1) and advocate enforced racial segregation
… his vision for the community—an enclave where residents fly "racialist" banners, where they are able to import enough … white nationalists to take control of the town government …John Eligon
 
white nationalism noun
  or less commonly White Nationalism
… a far right platform that includes white nationalism and opposition to Israel.

But, here is another term that is also listed: 
 

black nationalist

noun

 
variants  or Black Nationalist
plural black nationalists or Black Nationalists
: a member of a Black advocacy group in the U.S. especially during the 1960's and 1970's that sought to empower Black people financially, promote a sense of Black community and identity, and form a separate self-governing Black nation  
 
often used before another noun
black nationalist groupsa Black Nationalist leader
 
Just wondering why the question or concept of a ban wouldn’t related to ALL racists?  Also, in a society that seems to love throwing around labels of “racist” very subjectively- how exactly would this be enforced?  Surely you wouldn’t base it on an opinion, right?  How about conviction of a crime?  That seems fair, right - well the good news is that is already in place.   The military also discharges / prevents entry (or at least did when I was in) for having racist tattoos, Nazi flags, and other clear identifiers of racism.  
 
Surely this one comment isn’t the only “evidence” the man is a racist?   Shouldn’t we be a little more careful before slapping a label like this on someone without some type of proof?  We seem quick to use the term “racist” as a weapon in this day & age for people we don’t agree with politically, and that’s pretty dangerous for everyone.  

I didn't know the military had a problem with Black racial supremacists? White supremacists views have actually been identified by the military as a problem within it's ranks. https://rollcall.com/2021/02/16/pentagon-report-reveals-inroads-white-supremacists-have-made-in-military/

Hadn't heard that Black supremacists also were an issue. Best get that removed too. 

As for Tommy Tugboat,  I'm just going to go out on a limb and assume his own freaking Brother might know him pretty well, and if he's not giving Tommy the benefit of the doubt I don't see any reason for me to either. Especially when these types of "misunderstandings" with Tuberville's language is pretty common at this point. Tubs can't go through one speech or interview without saying something dumb or questionable that his press office has to later come out claiming everyone just didn't understand what he "really" was saying.

As for identifying these people.....So you are saying tattoos are the only possible ways one can be identified as a racist or white supremacists?

No, Being associated with militant groups such as the Proud Boys, 3 percenters, Patriots Front ect should be a disqualifier, as should social media activity that advocates for racist ideals and ideas. Nothing identifies a white supremacists quite as easily as what they actually say and advocate for. 

Edited by CoffeeTiger
  • Like 3
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, GoAU said:

How would you define “white nationalist”?

That's the crux of the matter.

Also, a big deal is being made about a tiny percentage of military members who are also racists. I think Lloyd Austin and this administration are creating a solution for a problem that doesn't exist at the scale they claim. Their "most serious threat to the military" claim is BS. Concentrating on woke use of pronouns and spending millions on changing the names of military bases rather than preparing to fight a war is the most serious threat.

As to Senator Tuberville's brother, this sounds like a case of the jealous loser brother taking a shot at his successful sibling. Not the first time for such as this and won't be the last either. Cain and Able come to mind. It goes that far back.

  • Like 2
  • Facepalm 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, GoAU said:

How would you define “white nationalist”?  Let’s take a look at the terminology.  I’ll assume we can all define “white”, so we’ll move along to the definition of “nationalist”. 

 

Are you serious?  :rolleyes:

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CoffeeTiger said:

I didn't know the military had a problem with Black racial supremacists? White supremacists views have actually been identified by the military as a problem within it's ranks. https://rollcall.com/2021/02/16/pentagon-report-reveals-inroads-white-supremacists-have-made-in-military/

Hadn't heard that Black supremacists also were an issue. Best get that removed too. 

As for Tommy Tugboat,  I'm just going to go out on a limb and assume his own freaking Brother might know him pretty well, and if he's not giving Tommy the benefit of the doubt I don't see any reason for me to either. Especially when these types of "misunderstandings" with Tuberville's language is pretty common at this point. Tubs can't go through one speech or interview without saying something dumb or questionable that his press office has to later come out claiming everyone just didn't understand what he "really" was saying.

As for identifying these people.....So you are saying tattoos are the only possible ways one can be identified as a racist or white supremacists?

No, Being associated with militant groups such as the Proud Boys, 3 percenters, Patriots Front ect should be a disqualifier, as should social media activity that advocates for racist ideals and ideas. Nothing identifies a white supremacists quite as easily as what they actually say and advocate for. 

So, if you don’t “know” about an issue, there must not be one, right?
 

 I guess you OK with having differing standards based on race - which therefore would make you, by definition, a racist.  Interesting.  
 

I also did NOT say tattoos were the only way, but I said they are A way.  I also referred to criminal record.   I’d love to hear what other ideas you may have.   Would an unconfirmed rumor or accusation do the trick?   Please do elaborate on this one.  The military does security screening for this in positions requiring a clearance, which are a small percentage of all roles.  Are you advocating security clearances for ALL members of the military?  
 

You do realize that some of the groups you mention, such as the Proud Boys & 3 Percenters have black members, right?  While they are certainly on the right of the political spectrum and are counter to the “woke” movement slinging around the “racist” tag is dishonest and / or intellectually dishonest.   Or maybe you’re saying these individuals just hate themselves?

As for his brother - you (or I) have no idea what their relationship is or whether or not his assessment is truthful.  

Edited by GoAU
  • Like 2
  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, homersapien said:

Are you serious?  :rolleyes:

 

 

Yes, if we’re going to talk about a label I think it’s only fair to define it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, GoAU said:

So, if you don’t “know” about an issue, there must not be one, right?
 

 I guess you OK with having differing standards based on race - which therefore would make you, by definition, a racist.  Interesting.  
 

 

 

I don’t feel like this is in response to anything I actually wrote. I provided a link where the military itself has identified white supremacists as a problem within its ranks, and the. I said that while I have not heard or seen where Black supremacists are a problem in the US military then if they are they need to be removed too. 
 

If you believe there is a Black supremacists problem in the military….then that’s fine, but do you have any evidence or sources for that claim? Otherwise it just looks like the standard conservative response of “BUT black people are bad too! Why are we not talking about bad Black people!?!?” That gets made whenever white racism is brought up in conversation. 

57 minutes ago, GoAU said:


 

I also did NOT say tattoos were the only way, but I said they are A way.  I also referred to criminal record.   I’d love to hear what other ideas you may have.   Would an unconfirmed rumor or accusation do the trick?   Please do elaborate on this one.  The military does security screening for this in positions requiring a clearance, which are a small percentage of all roles.  Are you advocating security clearances for ALL members of the military?

 

 No, unconfirmed rumors shouldn’t be sufficient, but perhaps more background checks and social media look ups would be necessary. I provided multiple examples in my last post on how these beliefs could be credibly identified. 

57 minutes ago, GoAU said:

 

 
 

You do realize that some of the groups you mention, such as the Proud Boys & 3 Percenters have black members, right?  While they are certainly on the right of the political spectrum and are counter to the “woke” movement slinging around the “racist” tag is dishonest and / or intellectually dishonest.   Or maybe you’re saying these individuals just hate themselves?

So? Don’t conservatives like to bring up “uhh black people also owned slaves” when the discussion of slavery gets brought up. 
 

yeah, Black people can be racist, fascists, bigoted, ect. And they can be apart of far-right cosplaying militia groups like were mentioned. 
 

it’s like saying Nazi Germany wasn’t anti-Semitic because there were some Jewish Nazis. 
 

if the army finds black members of those groups then kick them out too. 

 

57 minutes ago, GoAU said:

As for his brother - you (or I) have no idea what their relationship is or whether or not his assessment is truthful.  

I’ll base my opinion on what Tuberville says and does. 
 

if you want to believe Tuberville’s press teams claims that he doesn’t ever really mean what actually comes out of his mouth then that’s fine too. 
 

 

Edited by CoffeeTiger
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CoffeeTiger said:

 

I don’t feel like this is in response to anything I actually wrote. I provided a link where the military itself has identified white supremacists as a problem within its ranks, and the. I said that while I have not heard or seen where Black supremacists are a problem in the US military then if they are they need to be removed too. 

Don't be too quick to confuse the echo chamber of Biden's political agenda with the military.  Biden himself said that white supremacy was the biggest threat to the US, which is laughable.     I'm not in any way, shape or form, saying racism is OK, but I'm far from convinced it's the huge threat the left like to perpetuate.  
 

If you believe there is a Black supremacists problem in the military….then that’s fine, but do you have any evidence or sources for that claim? Otherwise it just looks like the standard conservative response of “BUT black people are bad too! Why are we not talking about bad Black people!?!?” That gets made whenever white racism is brought up in conversation. 

No - it's just the standard response of - if we are attacking racism, then let's attack racism, and not just certain aspects of it.   Racism cannot be fought with more racism.

 

 No, unconfirmed rumors shouldn’t be sufficient, but perhaps more background checks and social media look ups would be necessary. I provided multiple examples in my last post on how these beliefs could be credibly identified.  More background checks and social media stalking - Orwell would be proud.  

So? Don’t conservatives like to bring up “uhh black people also owned slaves” when the discussion of slavery gets brought up. 
 

yeah, Black people can be racist, fascists, bigoted, ect. And they can be apart of far-right cosplaying militia groups like were mentioned. 
 

it’s like saying Nazi Germany wasn’t anti-Semitic because there were some Jewish Nazis. 
 

if the army finds black members of those groups then kick them out too. 

The point I made flew right over your head...  At least 2 of the groups you mentioned and labeled as racist have nothing to do at all with racism or white supremacy - but hey, don't let the truth get in you way.   This is yet another example about why your point above regarding social media checks is garbage - it's completely subjective.

 

I’ll base my opinion on what Tuberville says and does. As you should, but "going out on a limb" and touting his brother's opinion as fact seems to fly contrary to that.
 

if you want to believe Tuberville’s press teams claims that he doesn’t ever really mean what actually comes out of his mouth then that’s fine too. That's not what I said either, I just merely asked what he said that was racist as I didn't see or hear anything, but I also don't live in Alabama any more or follow him closely.
 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The senator’s office then said in a statement to AL.com that Tuberville’s quote “shows that he was being skeptical of the notion that there are white nationalists in the military, not that he believes they should be in the military.”

Tubs isn't stupid; this is clearly what he meant. He certainly could have put it better.

  • Thanks 1
  • Facepalm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, GoAU said:

Yes, if we’re going to talk about a label I think it’s only fair to define it.  

Well, let me try.

"White nationalist" is a term for a person who believes the country should be dominated or controlled exclusively by and for people of the white "race" and anyone of (sufficient) color is less than a full citizen. 

It is clearly racist, as well as un-American.

Does that help? 

Here's more....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_nationalism

White nationalism is a type of racial nationalism or pan-nationalism which espouses the belief that white people are a race[1] and seeks to develop and maintain a white racial and national identity.[2][3][4] Many of its proponents identify with and are attached to the concept of a white nation, or a "white ethnostate".[5]

White nationalists say they seek to ensure the survival of the white race, and the cultures of historically white states. They hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost in these countries.[4] Many white nationalists believe that miscegenation, multiculturalism, immigration of nonwhites and low birth rates among whites are threatening the white race.[6]

Analysts describe white nationalism as overlapping with white supremacism and white separatism.[7][4][6][8][9][10] White nationalism is sometimes described as a euphemism for, or subset of, white supremacism, and the two have been used interchangeably by journalists and analysts.[8][11] White separatism is the pursuit of a "white-only state", while supremacism is the belief that white people are superior to nonwhites and should dominate them,[6][8][9] taking ideas from social Darwinism and Nazism.[12] Critics argue that the term "white nationalism" is simply a "rebranding", and ideas such as white pride exist solely to provide a sanitized public face for "white supremacy", which white nationalists allegedly avoid using because of its negative connotations,[13][14] and that most white nationalist groups promote racial violence.[15]

Edited by homersapien
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, homersapien said:

Well, let me try.

"White nationalist" is a term for a person who believes the country should be dominated or controlled exclusively by and for people of the white "race" and anyone of (sufficient) color is less than a full citizen. 

It is clearly racist, as well as un-American.

Does that help? 

Here's more....

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_nationalism

White nationalism is a type of racial nationalism or pan-nationalism which espouses the belief that white people are a race[1] and seeks to develop and maintain a white racial and national identity.[2][3][4] Many of its proponents identify with and are attached to the concept of a white nation, or a "white ethnostate".[5]

White nationalists say they seek to ensure the survival of the white race, and the cultures of historically white states. They hold that white people should maintain their majority in majority-white countries, maintain their political and economic dominance, and that their cultures should be foremost in these countries.[4] Many white nationalists believe that miscegenation, multiculturalism, immigration of nonwhites and low birth rates among whites are threatening the white race.[6]

Analysts describe white nationalism as overlapping with white supremacism and white separatism.[7][4][6][8][9][10] White nationalism is sometimes described as a euphemism for, or subset of, white supremacism, and the two have been used interchangeably by journalists and analysts.[8][11] White separatism is the pursuit of a "white-only state", while supremacism is the belief that white people are superior to nonwhites and should dominate them,[6][8][9] taking ideas from social Darwinism and Nazism.[12] Critics argue that the term "white nationalism" is simply a "rebranding", and ideas such as white pride exist solely to provide a sanitized public face for "white supremacy", which white nationalists allegedly avoid using because of its negative connotations,[13][14] and that most white nationalist groups promote racial violence.[15]

Not really, as you just cut and pasted something essentially synonymous with my post from earlier, but OK.  I’m guessing you didn’t read the entire post or just missed it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/3/2023 at 12:38 PM, GoAU said:

Not really, as you just cut and pasted something essentially synonymous with my post from earlier, but OK.  I’m guessing you didn’t read the entire post or just missed it. 

But do you now understand what a "white nationalist" is?  Or do you feel we need to take more time to define it?  

After all, that's what your OP suggested - the one in which I asked "are you serious?"

Edited by homersapien
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t think anyone here is going to defend Tuberville from being a dumbass. But these words are being twisted and a false narrative is being spread. 
     If anyone watched the fbi whistle blowers house hearings, we know FBI brass gets bonus points for opening up investigations. That’s where these ridiculous numbers of white supremacists running around the country ( that nobody ever actually sees) comes from. 

  • Like 2
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, alexava said:

I don’t think anyone here is going to defend Tuberville from being a dumbass. But these words are being twisted and a false narrative is being spread. 
     If anyone watched the fbi whistle blowers house hearings, we know FBI brass gets bonus points for opening up investigations. That’s where these ridiculous numbers of white supremacists running around the country ( that nobody ever actually sees) comes from. 

Oh they are there. I don’t know their actual numbers but to deny they exist is short sighted and naive. One very recent example. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/audio-coming-reporter-taped-oklahoma-leaders-talking-killing-reporters-rcna80299

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not denying they exist. I’m saying the numbers aren’t such that they are any serious concern.  They are boogeymen who serve the purpose of the political left. In turn the political left makes it worth the while for the FBI to create numbers of them. Groups like the Proud Boys are lumped into it and are not white supremacists. 

  • Dislike 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Gowebb11 said:

Oh they are there. I don’t know their actual numbers but to deny they exist is short sighted and naive. One very recent example. 

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/audio-coming-reporter-taped-oklahoma-leaders-talking-killing-reporters-rcna80299

This could be serious or could be heavily edited to sound serious. At any rate you got a single person or 2 running his mouth in what was a private conversation. Not indicating a national security threat. 

  • Facepalm 3
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, alexava said:

I’m not denying they exist. I’m saying the numbers aren’t such that they are any serious concern.  They are boogeymen who serve the purpose of the political left. In turn the political left makes it worth the while for the FBI to create numbers of them. Groups like the Proud Boys are lumped into it and are not white supremacists. 

There are more of them and are more dangerous than trannies (the right's boogieman), yet every thread here seems to always end up talking about trannies.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alexava said:

I don’t think anyone here is going to defend Tuberville from being a dumbass. But these words are being twisted and a false narrative is being spread. 
     If anyone watched the fbi whistle blowers house hearings, we know FBI brass gets bonus points for opening up investigations. That’s where these ridiculous numbers of white supremacists running around the country ( that nobody ever actually sees) comes from. 

"Nobody ever actually sees" ?  :rolleyes:

 

United States

tenor.gif?itemid=12598832

 

Edited by homersapien
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alexava said:

I’m not denying they exist. I’m saying the numbers aren’t such that they are any serious concern.  They are boogeymen who serve the purpose of the political left. In turn the political left makes it worth the while for the FBI to create numbers of them. Groups like the Proud Boys are lumped into it and are not white supremacists. 

How many people does it take to say, blow up a federal office building?

Or hell, fly a jet into a skyscraper?

Edited by homersapien
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, alexava said:

This could be serious or could be heavily edited to sound serious. At any rate you got a single person or 2 running his mouth in what was a private conversation. Not indicating a national security threat. 

These are exactly the sort of people that fill the ranks of white nationalist organizations. 

The point is they aren't all exactly all that rare.

Edited by homersapien
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Members Online

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...