97% = settled science...right?

[TheBlueVue 177]

"A paper by five leading climatologists published in the journal Science and Education last year found that Cook’s study misrepresented the views of most consensus scientists.

The definition Cook used to get his consensus was weak, the climatologists said. Only 41 out of the 11,944 published climate studies examined by Cook explicitly stated that mankind caused most of the warming since 1950 — meaning the actual consensus is 0.3 percent.

“It is astonishing that any journal could have published a paper claiming a 97% climate consensus when on the authors’ own analysis the true consensus was well below 1%,” said Dr. David Legates, a geology professor at the University of Delaware and the study’s lead author."

Read more: http://dailycaller.c.../#ixzz31zoME8PG

Bottom line? Just another political lie Obama foisted on the populace in his thirst for more money and power.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

The lies are really piling up. There may be a new mountain soon......Mt. Obama....which will be his legacy.

[AUFAN78 4,061]

Shocker :-\