AU66 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 other boards are saying as soon as tomorrow. ST? MAYOR? JS? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
auburn4ever 1,266 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 To who? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUMedic 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Did we offer him? I didnt think we did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU66 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Author Share Posted January 20, 2010 to Au, supposedly Taylor visited and now Ambles is all AU Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuffy11111 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Trooper apparently visited him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhiz7 273 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 If anyone has more info on this I would really like to know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rednilla 5,391 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 If anyone has more info on this I would really like to know. Me too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 to Au, supposedly Taylor visited and now Ambles is all AU Mmmmmhhhmmmm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weegleweegle 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 If Coach Troop came to my house and offered me a scholarship to AU, I would take him up on it too..... He is an awesome recruiter!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bootskii 264 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Me three Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuburnEngineer 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Sounds Sketchy... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bootskii 264 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Did we offer him? I didnt think we did. Rivals reports we offered him a scholly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUchris22 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Things are certainly getting interesting with Ambles... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rbwareagle34 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Sounds Sketchy... -Signed rbwareagle34 (the day I heard we were bringing in Cam Newton for a visit... ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewhiz7 273 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 This feels like Cam Newton all over again. We aren't interested and he has bad attitude issues ect.... Then we offer, become almost instant leaders and then get him. Let's do it again guys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trench Warfare 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 This would be quite suprising considering that early on in the recruiting process we supposedly backed off due to off the field issues. However, his talent has never been in question and if this coaching staff feels comfortable with him he would be a great pickup. I am just happy that this staff has made an effort to recruit top tier athletes as opposed to a more passive recruiting strategy that Tubberville employed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stripe 5 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I feel comfortable with CGC being able to deal with anyone's attitude as we have seen this staff isn't afraid to show someone the door if they can't pull themselves together and act like an Auburn man should. Bring him on! War Damn Eagle! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cap0006 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 the addition of Ambles would make one of the best, if not the best wr groups in the country. However, anybody have specifics on his "character issues"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUTigergrad08 617 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 the addition of Ambles would make one of the best, if not the best wr groups in the country. However, anybody have specifics on his "character issues"? It's right on his rivals page... "It is really all up to him. He can be as good as he wants, or as bad as his effort level and attitude allows him to be. If he stays focused on being the best, then he should become an All-America candidate." But, bottom line, I think you take him. The kid is too good to pass up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bootskii 264 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 This would be quite suprising considering that early on in the recruiting process we supposedly backed off due to off the field issues. However, his talent has never been in question and if this coaching staff feels comfortable with him he would be a great pickup. I am just happy that this staff has made an effort to recruit top tier athletes as opposed to a more passive recruiting strategy that Tubberville employed. Hey I liked the duck hunting approach when it came close to NSD strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
F15fighter4AU 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I am not sure I like the idea of ambles. Sure i would love to have his stars to beef up our recruiting rankings but we have a ton of WR now. If we bring him in does one of our other WR de-commit and go some place else? Adams,TZach,Benton,Blake,Gulley,Frenchy,Stallworth,Carr Reed,Kitchens,Goodwin,Richardson, Then if we sign ambles. 12 w/o ambles, 13 with. What position is white going, corner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ausoldiergrad 57 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I am not sure I like the idea of ambles. Sure i would love to have his stars to beef up our recruiting rankings but we have a ton of WR now. If we bring him in does one of our other WR de-commit and go some place else? Adams,TZach,Benton,Blake,Gulley,Frenchy,Stallworth,Carr Reed,Kitchens,Goodwin,Richardson, Then if we sign ambles. 12 w/o ambles, 13 with. What position is white going, corner? Yes White is going to play corner, and it would be a great situation to build longterm depth at WR. If we signed all of these guys, we probably wouldn't even need any next year, and we could redshirt most of the guys coming in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gr82b4au 5,568 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 White is a corner. Ambles - I think he is a fallback player for a LOT of teams - UAT, AU, etc. I think LSU would take him in a second. As long as we keep Reed, Goodwin, JR, etc... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IManAUBURNlifer 0 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 Yea Ryan White will be a corner. And I think all of our WR guys will stay. I hope I'm wrong but maybe the coaches got word that Richardson for sure won't qualify so now we are going strong after Ambles. I hope not becaues I really like JR. I really hope he makes it to campus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rednilla 5,391 Posted January 20, 2010 Share Posted January 20, 2010 I am not sure I like the idea of ambles. Sure i would love to have his stars to beef up our recruiting rankings but we have a ton of WR now. If we bring him in does one of our other WR de-commit and go some place else? Adams,TZach,Benton,Blake,Gulley,Frenchy,Stallworth,Carr Reed,Kitchens,Goodwin,Richardson, Then if we sign ambles. 12 w/o ambles, 13 with. What position is white going, corner? Gulley has been playing corner, PPL apparently hasn't done much for himself since getting in the doghouse before the season, and I think if we sign Ambles we'll probably end up moving either Reed or Goodwin to corner, or maybe Kitchens to safety. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.