TitanTiger 20,542 Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 Most of you guys are just high. ^^^Post of the thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoetTiger 1,901 Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 No consideration for Bill Clark..available ..good coach...would come relatively inexpensive...but most importantly a good damn defensive coach Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TitanTiger 20,542 Posted December 3, 2014 Share Posted December 3, 2014 No consideration for Bill Clark..available ..good coach...would come relatively inexpensive...but most importantly a good damn defensive coach He's on the list...the list that you look at if Muschamp says no. But there are other damn good defensive coaches on that list than might not come cheap, but have more experience at this level. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoetTiger 1,901 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Watching his defense get railed against crab legs and crew....should end any convo of him being even a dark horse candidate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aubearcat 2,138 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 If there is no muschamp, I for one am hoping for venables, Clark, or perhaps Diaz. IF, Aliotti is interested in coming out of retirement, I would like to have him second most behind muschamp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,928 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Watching his defense get railed against crab legs and crew....should end any convo of him being even a dark horse candidate. Yeah, because its absolutely a total picture to judge a performance based on ONE game.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarEagle10 77 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 So we have gone from Muchamp to Roof? This reminds me of going from Bill O'Brien (or whoever the NFL OC was supposed to be) to Scott Loeffler as our OC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tigger85 0 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 I remembered why I don't want Ted Roof when Fl State recievers are wide open with many blown coverages! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTim 3,457 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Most ridiculous thread I have read here in a while. THAT includes some pretty stupid threads... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
InfernoOrangeSS 321 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Most ridiculous thread I have read here in a while. THAT includes some pretty stupid threads... I agree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jojo1515 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Forced 1 punt all night. About as pathetic as a defense can possibly play. Not only no to Roof but heeeeeeeelllllllllll nooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarEagle1983 2,185 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 After what has happened tonight can we now just kill this thread just like Winston killed GT's defense all night? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dual-Threat Rigby 8,819 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 seriously why hasn't this thread been deleted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caleb1633 1,418 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Most ridiculous thread I have read here in a while. THAT includes some pretty stupid threads... I agree. The aliens thought they had found intelligent life in the universe. That was until they went to an Auburn football forum during a coaching search. Since then they've passed us by and continue their quest to find intelligent life. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest jojo1515 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Most ridiculous thread I have read here in a while. THAT includes some pretty stupid threads... I agree. The aliens thought they had found intelligent life in the universe. That was until they went to an Auburn football forum during a coaching search. Since then they've passed us by and continue their quest to find intelligent life. Good I hear they bring probes :/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
quietfan 233 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Regardless of CTR's abilities/talents, I think hiring him would be a terrible PR and morale step. I'm afraid the media, fans, and most importantly recruits, would see it as a step backward, a loss/failure in the DC search after pursuing Muschamp, and a stumble in the program momentum that CGM is trying to build. JMHO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
au75 75 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 BUMP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cooltigger21 0 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 I think last night Roof demonstrated that he can put a good defense on the field but not one that is good enough to stand up to the best offenses and best teams. BVG I think has demonstrated that as well. You can put up good numbers against weak competition which he has done throughout most of his career. Granted Chizik did meddle in his defense to a degree but that wasn't the sole reason for his troubles at AU. Not everybody can coach defense well enough to stand up to the talent that you face week in and week out in the SEC. That's not to say that someone outside the SEC can't come in and do it but you have to be careful of stats from someone that coaches 9 weeks out of 12 against less than stellar offensive talent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mikey 16,777 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Gus and Roof were co-coordinators at AU. The answer to the OP lies in how the two worked together. Myself, I think we can do better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoetTiger 1,901 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Watching his defense get railed against crab legs and crew....should end any convo of him being even a dark horse candidate. Yeah, because its absolutely a total picture to judge a performance based on ONE game.. Maybe not a total picture but it is very telling. He should be way down the list based on this performance alone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tigerchris 243 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Sorry, but IMO Roof would be a lateral hire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarTiger 3,928 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Watching his defense get railed against crab legs and crew....should end any convo of him being even a dark horse candidate. Yeah, because its absolutely a total picture to judge a performance based on ONE game.. Maybe not a total picture but it is very telling. Not really He should be way down the list based on this performance alone Yeah, because every defense holds the only undefeated team in the country to 3 fg's in the second half. Why would any team want that? That's definitely enough to push him way down the list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PoetTiger 1,901 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 There were two touchdowns the guy was wide open with a defender trailing by at least 5 yards - I mean it happened twice in the same game. Not like they had to fight for the ball I mean they were wide open. Did not look they were well prepared or made any in game adjustments at all...one or two stops and GaTech wins this game... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randman5000 4,235 Posted December 7, 2014 Share Posted December 7, 2014 Can we shut this thread down. Kind of Rediculous Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.