Jump to content

Jarquez Hunter


Tigger1985

Recommended Posts

14 hours ago, AUpreacherman22 said:

🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

This is not what I was expecting from a thread titled “Jarquez Hunter”.   I was expecting preseason all-SEC, or he’s loving the new offense, he’s got high hopes for the upcoming season……

But not this!😥🤦‍♂️

Praying for everyone involved.   There are no winners in this scenario.   

Anytime I see a title with just a player's name, I'm not expecting good things, unfortunately.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites





6 minutes ago, Son of A Tiger said:

I hope this isn't credible. If intended to be what is the source?

It's not. At all. Pure garbage ...well, the CHF stuff and the non-consensual videoing 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Tigerpro2a said:

The level of terrible reporting in this world never ceases to amaze....

 

image.thumb.png.25ac081ec11c30801f6ba6a063a86193.png

Call out the source. They deserve to be ridiculed by Auburn Twitter until they realize the trash human being they are

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KansasTiger said:

They deserve to be ridiculed by Auburn Twitter until they realize the trash human being they are

That's a little harsh.  You have to understand tabloid reporting. 

 

Reporter to random team member:  Does CHF attend film study sessions?

Random team member to reporter:  Of course, he and/or the position coaches.

 

There you go.  Verified and factual reporting.  Coach attends film sessions.

 

 

  • Haha 1
  • Dislike 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, KansasTiger said:

Call out the source. They deserve to be ridiculed by Auburn Twitter until they realize the trash human being they are

Unfortunately human trash is incapable of self awareness or maybe it is better stated that they have no issue with being morally reprehensible so therefore no reason to change. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, icanthearyou said:

That's a little harsh.  You have to understand tabloid reporting. 

 

Reporter to random team member:  Does CHF attend film study sessions?

Random team member to reporter:  Of course, he and/or the position coaches.

 

There you go.  Verified and factual reporting.  Coach attends film sessions.

 

 

I dont think it's harsh at all. I understand how it works, and I understand that it's spreading to main stream news not just tabloids. It's lazy, irresponsible, often intentional and therefore immoral, and contributes to the worsening of society (the general practice, not this specific event). So I think I may not have been harsh enough.

  • Like 4
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, aujohnson said:

Unfortunately human trash is incapable of self awareness or maybe it is better stated that they have no issue with being morally reprehensible so therefore no reason to change. 

They are morally reprehensible about subject matter that is morally reprehensible!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, KansasTiger said:

I dont think it's harsh at all. I understand how it works, and I understand that it's spreading to main stream news not just tabloids. It's lazy, irresponsible, often intentional and therefore immoral, and contributes to the worsening of society (the general practice, not this specific event). So I think I may not have been harsh enough.

Apology for the frivolity.   Carry on with the outrage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, icanthearyou said:

Apology for the frivolity.   Carry on with the outrage.

Thats OK. I forgive your naivety. You'll learn someday.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, icanthearyou said:

What am I suppose to be learning?

Apparently, that misleading and flat out lying to the public by 'news reporters' is immoral.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, KansasTiger said:

Apparently, that misleading and flat out lying to the public by 'news reporters' is immoral.

Oh, you thought I was being serious.  I don't allow that sort of nonsense to affect me. 

I don't blame the messenger.  I blame myself when I believe obvious BS.

Lying has become a huge business.  It's up to us to recognize it.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, icanthearyou said:

Oh, you thought I was being serious.  I don't allow that sort of nonsense to affect me. 

I don't blame the messenger.  I blame myself when I believe obvious BS.

Lying has become a huge business.  It's up to us to recognize it.

I bet youre a hoot in the political forum...jees.

It's ok to blame the messenger when they change the message. I'll just leave it at that. I dont want to derail the thread anymore by going into this too deep.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KansasTiger said:

I bet youre a hoot in the political forum...jees.

It's ok to blame the messenger when they change the message. I'll just leave it at that. I dont want to derail the thread anymore by going into this too deep.

I apologize.  I meant nothing personal towards you.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Tigerpro2a said:

The level of terrible reporting in this world never ceases to amaze....

 

image.thumb.png.25ac081ec11c30801f6ba6a063a86193.png

What website is this from. I assume this is some onion style site 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You think that’s bad reporting!

 

  • Haha 1
  • Angry 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, toddc said:

You think that’s bad reporting!

 

Wtf

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, icanthearyou said:

Who is this source?

 

3 hours ago, KansasTiger said:

Call out the source. They deserve to be ridiculed by Auburn Twitter until they realize the trash human being they are

Sorry guys I been away all morning. I was just perusing through some Googles searches and reading different reports. I just happen to see the Hugh Freeze line in the description.  When I just went back to find the page....I happened to check their "fact checking policy" LMAO. 

https://oxgaps.org/jarquez-hunter/

image.thumb.png.e00c332fe549e85da803c75cdbe2f2db.png

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tigerpro2a said:

 

Sorry guys I been away all morning. I was just perusing through some Googles searches and reading different reports. I just happen to see the Hugh Freeze line in the description.  When I just went back to find the page....I happened to check their "fact checking policy" LMAO. 

https://oxgaps.org/jarquez-hunter/

image.thumb.png.e00c332fe549e85da803c75cdbe2f2db.png

According to the article the u iversity also suspended Hugh Freeze. It's like they had bad AI write this article. This can't possibly be a real person.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Tigerpro2a said:

 

Sorry guys I been away all morning. I was just perusing through some Googles searches and reading different reports. I just happen to see the Hugh Freeze line in the description.  When I just went back to find the page....I happened to check their "fact checking policy" LMAO. 

https://oxgaps.org/jarquez-hunter/

image.thumb.png.e00c332fe549e85da803c75cdbe2f2db.png

Well I left this comment and it's 'awaiting moderation'. What do you wanna bet they don't let it through:

This is one of the worst written articles I have ever read. I saw you have a fact checking policy and that you don’t publish non verified info. Can you please link where Hugh Freeze has been mentioned being in these videos? Can you link where anyone has reported Hugh Freeze has been suspended? This is trash tabloid crap. You should be ashamed to call yourself a self glorified live journal blogger, much less any type of journalist or reporter.

  • Like 1
  • Love 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, KansasTiger said:

According to the article the u iversity also suspended Hugh Freeze. It's like they had bad AI write this article. This can't possibly be a real person.

I know nothing of this website....but if a person literally did write this they need to go back to their regular 9 to 5er of sign spinning or whatever other low skill job they had.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/19/2023 at 9:15 AM, W.E.D said:

IDK about kids these days, I'm not old but Zoomers are a bit different than my elder Millennial friends, but I just can't see the logic of the twitter account being the girl in the video.  Getting bent over a bed w/ a player behind you and filmed from behind or having a threesome where you've got a hand on your head blowing a guy while his buddy films/hits it from behind.....those just aren't videos I can see 99% of woman wanting publicly on the internet.  It does nothing for her.

I buy more into the twitter account being some jilted ex who somehow got these videos and wanted to embarrass the players/girl.  That makes more sense to me.  Now it just comes to how these videos were obtained by the twitter account.  Getting hacked is the best scenario.  Worst case is the group text is true & all parties weren't aware of it.  Worst worst case is the woman didn't know she was being filmed, but some ppl have claimed full length videos show she knew.

Feel like the twitter account 100% posted revenge porn and broke numerous laws.  They said as much in the tweets.  Pretty stupid by them.  Unfortunately it might not vindicate the players.

I think the best case outcome would be players broke no laws, but probably violated some Auburn/AD Code of Conducts and will get suspended for 3 games.  And honestly Hugh needs to set some standards.  College kids are gonna have sex, but stop being morons and filming it and showing it to other people.  That should be pretty clear.

This!

This is a multi pronged issue that some have so far refused to treat seriously and grasp the severity of. Even if they are proven to not be guilty of any criminal activity like revenge porn, that still doesn't clear them of potential Auburn Code of Student Conduct violations. If it comes out that the players knew they were being filmed and consented to it, they could still very well miss a couple of games for violating university policies.

Auburn is in a no-win situation PR wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...