Jump to content

Play the season without fans at the stadium


doc4aday

Recommended Posts





  • Replies 443
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Just let people make their own choice imo. If they think they’ll be at risk from going then don’t go. If not, have fun. Just encourage people to practice social distancing and good hygiene the best they can at the stadium and when they order tickets 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/23/2020 at 6:20 PM, Eagle Eye 7 said:

It’s not a matter of opening it’s a matter of how we open. I have had times I have had to go into dangerous situations because I had no other choice . What I did have was the sense to be educated about how I went in. Same hear . I don’t understand why people feel criminalized by wearing a face mask. I’m in the middle of contact training class thru John Hopkins so I maybe understand things a little better than others but this I can tell you, if everyone wore a face mask ( correctly) we would almost completely eliminate it. 

I disagree and so do a lot of medical professionals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say that at this moment, I am going to assume everyone or close to it has been exposed to COVID. It is just so many carriers out there who are asymptomatic. I floated to a step-down COVID unit, and I will say of the 90 percent of those folks who were either COVID positive or pending were discharged because they were asymptomatic or ended up not being COVID Positive. Most were verified COVID positive now. Currently, in my hospital, which is the biggest in the Milwaukee Metro area, the feel is the MDs are now hyper-vigilant in COVID testing, and I agree. Heck, last week, I had a patient clearly septic, but they forego this to prioritize COVID testing. Of course, they weren't but were indeed septic. I guess now my position would be, if you are experiencing the multiple symptoms, definitely get to the hospital. I know diarrhea is a consistent symptom, but heck that can be a stomach bug. Yet, we have people with diarrhea who come to the ED, go to a COVID unit for a day just to wait until the results are finished, only to find out they are negative, and the diarrhea is all good now. It is all very confusing for your frontline staff. Still, I advocate, even if you are doing you, to try to be as safe as possible.

DAG OUT. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A doctor here or there might dissent, but theirs very much is in fact the dissenting opinion against a lot of research and evidence. 

Quote

micro-droplets fell out of the air within 1.5 meters of the person who was wearing a mask, versus 5 meters for those not wearing masks.

 

Quote

Given all of the laboratory and epidemiological evidence, the low cost of wearing masks – which can be made at home with no tools – and the potential to slow COVID-19 transmission with widescale use, policymakers should ensure that everyone wears a mask in public.

 

https://theconversation.com/masks-help-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-the-science-is-simple-and-im-one-of-100-experts-urging-governors-to-require-public-mask-wearing-138507

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, McLoofus said:

A doctor here or there might dissent, but theirs very much is in fact the dissenting opinion against a lot of research and evidence. 

 

 

https://theconversation.com/masks-help-stop-the-spread-of-coronavirus-the-science-is-simple-and-im-one-of-100-experts-urging-governors-to-require-public-mask-wearing-138507

So no need to wear a mask in public if you practice self distancing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, oracle79 said:

Yeah, but did they study anyone other than Lou Holtz and Sylvester the cat?

Funny, but 100,000 people haven't died because they literally hocked loogies on each other. 

There's a lot more gross stuff coming out of our faces when we just talk or breathe than we realize. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

Funny, but 100,000 people haven't died because they literally hocked loogies on each other. 

There's a lot more gross stuff coming out of our faces when we just talk or breathe than we realize. 

Now we can sure agree on that. Just read some posts.😀

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Requiring mask wearing in public is a bad move.  Legislating  morality usually doesn’t work and creates more problems.  Just explain your stance and let the people decide what is best.  Is this mask wearing only during the outbreaks or is it going to be the *new normal*?  If you like this type of control, you like big government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not offering an opinion either way on masks but heard something on the news tonight about the varying opinions of so much related to this virus. It sounds like there is not scientific consensus on any one opinion. It seems even the smartest out there simply don’t know for sure. I have whiplash trying to understand the directive of the day. so I have decided to use my own common sense and personal responsibility and hopefully I will make good choices.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/28/2020 at 9:29 PM, Proud Tiger said:

Quoting from the article:

"The World Health Organization is recommending healthy people, including those who don't exhibit COVID-19 symptoms, only wear masks when taking care of someone infected with the contagion, a sharp contrast from the advice given by American public health officials who recommend everyone wear a mask in public.

"If you do not have any repository symptoms such as fever, cough or runny nose, you do not need to wear a mask," Dr. April Baller, a public health specialist for the WHO, says in a video on the world health body's website posted in March. "Masks should only be used by health care workers, caretakers or by people who are sick with symptoms of fever and cough."

The bottom line is, nobody knows how to approach this coronavirus situation. We don't even know if the efforts we have undertaken so far have made one iota of difference. The previous post, by @BJCrawford is the only course of action that makes any sense at all. The government needs to get out of this, apparently their experts don't know any more about it than I do and my best source of information is Dr. Wilt's Microbiology class at AU, several decades ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, I_M4_AU said:

Requiring mask wearing in public is a bad move.  Legislating  morality usually doesn’t work and creates more problems.  Just explain your stance and let the people decide what is best.  Is this mask wearing only during the outbreaks or is it going to be the *new normal*?  If you like this type of control, you like big government.

Image may contain: meme and text

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Proud Tiger said:

And from May 21, the New England Journal of Med....by all means, let's all wear talismans.  Play the games.

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, japantiger said:

And from May 21, the New England Journal of Med....by all means, let's all wear talismans.  Play the games.

We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.

It is also clear that masks serve symbolic roles. Masks are not only tools, they are also talismans that may help increase health care workers’ perceived sense of safety, well-being, and trust in their hospitals.

We’ve created a new reason for #Karen.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So today I purchased my season tickets and season parking pass for the 2020 season.  I did it with the understanding that if there was no season or it was cut short I would be refunded.  I did this for two reasons:  #1  I would not lose my seats for 2021.  #2  If it is deemed safe I will go.  I will not go if the medical professionals say it is too risky.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The answer has been revealed to us in the last 24 hours.  We need to hold all games during riots.  Apparently the evil coronavirus can't be transmitted by large, packed  crowds burning buildings and stealing TV's and liquor.  

And just like that, Pandemic over...Play the games

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2020 at 9:47 AM, japantiger said:

The answer has been revealed to us in the last 24 hours.  We need to hold all games during riots.  Apparently the evil Wuhan flu can't be transmitted by large, packed  crowds burning buildings and stealing TV's and liquor.  

And just like that, Pandemic over...Play the games

Sadly, the coronavirus doesn't seem to bother 15 to 45 year olds and those are the ones doing the rioting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, McLoofus said:

Somebody left the back door open.

I hate when that happens

 

Screenshot_20200531-153801~2.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...